OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether excursions of blood pressure from the optimal mean arterial pressure during and after cardiac surgery are associated with postoperative delirium identified using a structured examination. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. SETTING: University hospital. PARTICIPANTS: The study included 110 patients undergoing cardiac surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were monitored using ultrasound-tagged near-infrared spectroscopy to assess optimal mean arterial pressure by cerebral blood flow autoregulation monitoring during cardiopulmonary bypass and the first 3 hours in the intensive care unit. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The patients were tested preoperatively and on postoperative days 1 to 3 with the Confusion Assessment Method or Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit, the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98, and the Mini Mental State Examination. Summative presence of delirium on postoperative days 1 through 3, as defined by the consensus panel following Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV-TR criteria, was the primary outcome. Delirium occurred in 47 (42.7%) patients. There were no differences in blood pressure excursions above and below optimal mean arterial pressure between patients with and without summative presence of delirium. Secondary analysis showed blood pressure excursions above the optimal mean arterial pressure to be higher in patients with delirium (mean±SD, 33.2±26.51 mmHgxh v 23.4±16.13 mmHgxh; p = 0.031) and positively correlated with the Delirium Rating Scale score on postoperative day 2 (r = 0.27, p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: Summative presence of delirium was not associated with perioperative blood pressure excursions; but on secondary exploratory analysis, excursions above the optimal mean arterial pressure were associated with the incidence and severity of delirium on postoperative day 2.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether excursions of blood pressure from the optimal mean arterial pressure during and after cardiac surgery are associated with postoperative delirium identified using a structured examination. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. SETTING: University hospital. PARTICIPANTS: The study included 110 patients undergoing cardiac surgery. INTERVENTIONS:Patients were monitored using ultrasound-tagged near-infrared spectroscopy to assess optimal mean arterial pressure by cerebral blood flow autoregulation monitoring during cardiopulmonary bypass and the first 3 hours in the intensive care unit. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The patients were tested preoperatively and on postoperative days 1 to 3 with the Confusion Assessment Method or Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit, the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98, and the Mini Mental State Examination. Summative presence of delirium on postoperative days 1 through 3, as defined by the consensus panel following Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV-TR criteria, was the primary outcome. Delirium occurred in 47 (42.7%) patients. There were no differences in blood pressure excursions above and below optimal mean arterial pressure between patients with and without summative presence of delirium. Secondary analysis showed blood pressure excursions above the optimal mean arterial pressure to be higher in patients with delirium (mean±SD, 33.2±26.51 mmHgxh v 23.4±16.13 mmHgxh; p = 0.031) and positively correlated with the Delirium Rating Scale score on postoperative day 2 (r = 0.27, p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: Summative presence of delirium was not associated with perioperative blood pressure excursions; but on secondary exploratory analysis, excursions above the optimal mean arterial pressure were associated with the incidence and severity of delirium on postoperative day 2.
Authors: Walther N K A van Mook; Roger J M W Rennenberg; Geert Willem Schurink; Robert Jan van Oostenbrugge; Werner H Mess; Paul A M Hofman; Peter W de Leeuw Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Elizabeth L Whitlock; Brian A Torres; Nan Lin; Daniel L Helsten; Molly R Nadelson; George A Mashour; Michael S Avidan Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 5.108
Authors: David J Meagher; Maeve Leonard; Sinead Donnelly; Marion Conroy; Dimitrios Adamis; Paula T Trzepacz Journal: J Psychosom Res Date: 2011-07-02 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Masahiro Ono; Kenneth Brady; R Blaine Easley; Charles Brown; Michael Kraut; Rebecca F Gottesman; Charles W Hogue Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2013-09-26 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Daijiro Hori; Masahiro Ono; Thomas E Rappold; John V Conte; Ashish S Shah; Duke E Cameron; Hideo Adachi; Allen D Everett; Charles W Hogue Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2015-06-16 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: E Wesley Ely; Ayumi Shintani; Brenda Truman; Theodore Speroff; Sharon M Gordon; Frank E Harrell; Sharon K Inouye; Gordon R Bernard; Robert S Dittus Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-04-14 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Maeve M Leonard; Meera Agar; Juliet A Spiller; Brid Davis; Mas M Mohamad; David J Meagher; Peter G Lawlor Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2014-05-28 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Jason B O'Neal; Frederic T Billings; Xulei Liu; Matthew S Shotwell; Yafen Liang; Ashish S Shah; Jesse M Ehrenfeld; Jonathan P Wanderer; Andrew D Shaw Journal: Can J Anaesth Date: 2017-07-17 Impact factor: 5.063
Authors: Miles Berger; Niccolò Terrando; S Kendall Smith; Jeffrey N Browndyke; Mark F Newman; Joseph P Mathew Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Carrie M Goodson; Kathryn Rosenblatt; Lucia Rivera-Lara; Paul Nyquist; Charles W Hogue Journal: J Intensive Care Med Date: 2016-10-25 Impact factor: 3.510
Authors: Dean Montgomery; Charles Brown; Charles W Hogue; Ken Brady; Mitsunori Nakano; Yohei Nomura; Andre Antunes; Paul S Addison Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2019-12-27 Impact factor: 5.108
Authors: Mitsunori Nakano; Yohei Nomura; Glenn Whitman; Marc Sussman; Stefano Schena; Ahmet Kilic; Chun W Choi; Kei Akiyoshi; Karin J Neufeld; Jennifer Lawton; Elizabeth Colantuoni; Atsushi Yamaguchi; Matthew Wen; Peter Smielewski; Ken Brady; Brian Bush; Charles W Hogue; Charles H Brown Journal: Br J Anaesth Date: 2021-03-23 Impact factor: 9.166
Authors: Martin H Bernardi; Martin Wahrmann; Martin Dworschak; Clemens Kietaibl; Robin Ristl; Maximilian Edlinger-Stanger; Andrea Lassnigg; Michael J Hiesmayr; Ulrike Weber Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 1.817
Authors: Dean Montgomery; Charles Brown; Charles W Hogue; Ken Brady; Mitsunori Nakano; Yohei Nomura; Andre Antunes; Paul S Addison Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2020-11 Impact factor: 6.627