Literature DB >> 27321317

Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) used in recent Phase 3 trials for Type 2 Diabetes: A review of concepts assessed by these PROs and factors to consider when choosing a PRO for future trials.

Matthew Reaney1, Celeste A Elash2, Leighann Litcher-Kelly3.   

Abstract

AIMS: Many treatment options are available for people with Type 2 Diabetes (T2D). While the goal of treatment is to reach target HbA1c levels, the psychological experience may be more tangible and meaningful for the patient. Together with biomarkers, Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) data provide a holistic understanding of the clinical and psychosocial impact of T2D and its treatment.
METHODS: A literature review was conducted in multiple databases to identify PRO endpoints used in Phase 3 trials of newer classes of drugs for the treatment of T2D.
RESULTS: This review identified five PRO concepts which were evaluated as endpoints in Phase 3 trials of GLP-1 receptor agonists, novel insulins, SGLT-2 inhibitors, and DPP-4 inhibitors; symptoms, health-related quality of life, psychological well-being, satisfaction with treatment/health and impact of weight. Twenty PRO questionnaires were used to measure these concepts/endpoints directly from patients. The relevance of, and scientific basis for, these concepts as endpoints are discussed, the similarities and differences between questionnaires targeting the same concepts/endpoints are explored, and the sensitivity of the questionnaires to the experimental intervention is summarized. In addition, factors that should be considered when choosing PROs for future T2D trials are discussed.
CONCLUSIONS: The information gained from PROs in clinical trial research is important in defining treatment benefit within the context of the trial, and the potential benefit (i.e. better adherence) in clinical practice. However, variable results have been observed in recent trials and careful and systematic consideration should be given to PRO selection for future studies of T2D.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Literature review; Patient-Reported Outcomes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27321317     DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2016.04.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract        ISSN: 0168-8227            Impact factor:   5.602


  14 in total

Review 1.  The Digital Outcome Measure.

Authors:  Adam B Cohen; Simon C Mathews
Journal:  Digit Biomark       Date:  2018-09-21

2.  Alignment between outcomes and minimal clinically important differences in the Dutch type 2 diabetes mellitus guideline and healthcare professionals' preferences.

Authors:  Marloes Dankers; Marjorie H J M G Nelissen-Vrancken; Bertien H Hart; Anke C Lambooij; Liset van Dijk; Aukje K Mantel-Teeuwisse
Journal:  Pharmacol Res Perspect       Date:  2021-05

3.  Improved treatment satisfaction and medication adherence after readjusting oral medication regimens with the cooperation of health insurance pharmacy in type 2 diabetic patients in Japan.

Authors:  Naoko Ogawa; Mitsuyoshi Takahara; Toshihiko Shiraiwa; Mayumi Yamamoto; Kaoru Yamamoto; Masayuki Doi; Yoko Yoshida; Setsuko Gotou
Journal:  J Pharm Health Care Sci       Date:  2017-12-06

4.  Does Time-in-Range Matter? Perspectives From People With Diabetes on the Success of Current Therapies and the Drivers of Improved Outcomes.

Authors:  Ava S Runge; Lynn Kennedy; Adam S Brown; Abigail E Dove; Brian J Levine; Sophie P Koontz; Varun S Iyengar; Sarah A Odeh; Kelly L Close; Irl B Hirsch; Richard Wood
Journal:  Clin Diabetes       Date:  2018-04

5.  Health-related quality of life in people with type 2 diabetes participating in the LEADER trial.

Authors:  Michael A Nauck; John B Buse; Johannes F E Mann; Stuart Pocock; Heidrun Bosch-Traberg; Helle Frimer-Larsen; Qing Ye; Alastair Gray
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 6.577

6.  Evaluating the User Performance and Experience with a Re-Engineered 4 mm × 32G Pen Needle: A Randomized Trial with Similar Length/Gauge Needles.

Authors:  Shahista Whooley; Toby Briskin; Michael A Gibney; Lydia R Blank; Julie Berube; Brian K Pflug
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 2.945

7.  Improved treatment satisfaction in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with once-weekly semaglutide in the SUSTAIN trials.

Authors:  Johan Jendle; Andreas L Birkenfeld; William H Polonsky; Robert Silver; Kari Uusinarkaus; Thomas Hansen; Jonas Håkan-Bloch; Sayeh Tadayon; Melanie J Davies
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 6.577

Review 8.  SCORE-IT (Selecting Core Outcomes for Randomised Effectiveness trials In Type 2 diabetes): a systematic review of registered trials.

Authors:  Nicola L Harman; Rebecca James; John Wilding; Paula R Williamson
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Psychometric evaluation of the Diabetes Injection Device Experience Questionnaire (DID-EQ) and Diabetes Injection Device Preference Questionnaire (DID-PQ).

Authors:  Louis S Matza; Katie D Stewart; Rosirene Paczkowski; Karin S Coyne; Brooke Currie; Kristina S Boye
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2018-09-19

10.  Selecting Core Outcomes for Randomised Effectiveness trials In Type 2 Diabetes (SCORE-IT): study protocol for the development of a core outcome set.

Authors:  Nicola L Harman; John Wilding; Dave Curry; James Harris; Jennifer Logue; R John Pemberton; Leigh Perreault; Gareth Thompson; Sean Tunis; Paula R Williamson
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.