| Literature DB >> 27321273 |
Chunfeng Wu1,2, Zihao Deng1, Zhao Long1, Yi Cai1, Zhongfu Ying1, Hanqi Yin1, Meijin Yuan1, Rollie J Clem3, Kai Yang1, Yi Pang1.
Abstract
As baculoviruses usually have a narrow insecticidal spectrum, knowing the mechanisms by which they control the host-range is prerequisite for improvement of their applications as pesticides. In this study, from supernatant of culture cells transfected with DNAs of an Autographa californica multiple nucleopolyhedrovirus (AcMNPV) mutant lacking the antiapoptotic gene p35 (vAc(∆P35)) and a cosmid representing a fragment of Spodoptera exigua nucleopolyhedrovirus (SeMNPV), a viral strain was plaque-purified and named vAcRev. vAcRev had a broader host range than either vAc(∆P35) or SeMNPV parental virus, being able to infect not only the permissive hosts of its parental viruses but also a nonpermissive host (Spodoptera litura). Genome sequencing indicated that vAcRev comprises a mixture of two viruses with different circular dsDNA genomes. One virus contains a genome similar to vAc(∆P35), while in the other viral genome, a 24.4 kbp-fragment containing 10 essential genesis replaced with a 4 kbp-fragment containing three SeMNPV genes including a truncated Se-iap3 gene. RNA interference and ectopic expression assays found that Se-iap3 is responsible for the host range expansion of vAcRev, suggesting that Se-iap3 inhibits the progression of apoptosis initiated by viral infection and promotes viral propagation in hosts both permissive and non-permissive for AcMNPV and SeMNPV.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27321273 PMCID: PMC4913269 DOI: 10.1038/srep28072
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(A) Sf9 cells were cotransfected with vAc∆P35 and the SeMNPV cosmid library (a). Most transfected cells underwent apoptosis while PIBs were produced in a few cells (arrowhead). Transfection of Sf9 cells with vAc∆P35 (b) resulted in cell apoptosis, while no cytopathic effects were observed in the SeMNPV cosmid library-transfected cells (c). Pictures were taken at 5 d p.t. (B) Sf9, Se301, and SpLi-221 cells were inoculated with the supernatants from the cotransfected cells. (C) Three types morphology of plaques in SpLi-221 cells (see text for description). (D) vAc∆P35- or vAcRev-infected Sf9, Se301, SpLi-221, and Hi5 cells at 72 h p.i.
Figure 2Viral replication kinetics.
Cells were infected with the indicated viruses at an MOI of 5 TCID50/cell, and the infectious BVs were titered using the corresponding cells. (A) vAcRev, vAcWT and vAc∆P35 in Hi5 cells. (B) vAcRev and vAcWT in Sf9 cells. (C) vAcRev and SeMNPV in Se301 cells. (D) vAcRev and SpltNPV in SpLi-221 cells. Each datum point was determined from the average of three independent infections and error bars represent the standard errors.
Dose-mortality response of insect larvae infected with different viruses.
| Host and viruses | Conc.set | LD50 | 95% fiducial limits | Slope |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Lower–upper) | ||||
| vAcRev | 1 | 82a | (64.4–104.4) | 1.2263 |
| AcMNPV | 1 | 111.1ab | (87.1–141.5) | 1.2037 |
| vAc∆P35 | 1 | 141.1b | (109.0–182.7) | 1.1267 |
| vAcRev | 2 | 5183.8c | (4003.4–6712.4) | 1.1328 |
| AcMNPV | 2 | 4219.4c | (3528.1 | 1.9109 |
| vAc∆P35 | 2 | 6214.2c | (4576.8 | 0.9082 |
| SeMNPV | 3 | 166.0d | (134.4–205.2) | 1.4350 |
| vAcRev | 4 | 3.026e | (2.262–4.047) | 0.9705 |
| vAc∆P35 | 5 | – | – | – |
| SpltNPV | 6 | 0.011f | (0.008–0.017) | 0.8731 |
(o)Orally inoculated; (i)intrahemocoelically inoculated.
1Concentration sets were selected as: set 1: 9 × 106, 3 × 106, 9 × 105, 3 × 105, and 9 × 104 PIBs/ml; set 2: 9 × 107, 3 × 107, 9 × 106, 3 × 106, and 9 × 105 PIBs/ml; set 3: 3 × 106, 9 × 105, 3 × 105, 9 × 104,and 3 × 104 PIBs/ml; set 4: 5 × 104, 1 × 104, 5 × 103, 1 × 103, and 5 × 102 TCID50/ml; set 5: 5 × 106, 5 × 105, 5 × 104, 5 × 103 and 5 × 102 TCID50/ml; set 6: 1 × 104, 1 × 103, 1 × 102, 1 × 101 and 1 × 100 TCID50/ml.
2&3For orally infected larvae, LD50 = PIBs/larvae; for intrahemocoelically-infected larvae, LD50 = TCID50/larvae. The mean values and standard deviation of three independent experiments are shown. All data were analyzed by t-test using independent samples. A P-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. The same letters (a~f) behind LD50 indicate that the LD50 values are not significantly different.
Figure 3Restriction enzyme analysis of vAcRev genomic DNA.
(A) Extracted DNA of vAcRev and vAc∆P35 were digested with HindIII, BamHI or NcoI, and the digested fragments were separated on 0.7% agarose gel. EcoT14I-digested λDNA was used as molecular size standards. (B) vAcRev genomic DNA was digested with Bsu36I and was analyzed by using pulsed field gel electrophoresis. λDNA was used as a marker.
Figure 4(A) Organization of the vAcRev-1 genome. The circular genome is showed in a linear format. The positions of the 131 ORFs identified are indicated by arrows that also represent the direction of transcription. Open arrows indicate that the ORF has 100% amino acid identity to its homologue in AcMNPV. Grey arrows represent that there are deletions, insertions or substitutions compared with its AcMNPV homologue. Dots above the ORFs represent nucleotide substitutions occurred in this regions. ↓ and ↑ represent deletions or insertions, respectively. Highly variable regions are boxed by border lines and the comparisons with the corresponding regions of vAc∆P35 and AcMNPV are illustrated in B~D. Gene organization in the lef2-pk-1 (B), Ac43-68 (C), and 94 K-hr5 (D) region of vAcRev and the corresponding regions of vAc∆P35 and AcMNPV.
Figure 5Effect of vAcRev-iap3 dsRNA on vAcRev-infected SpLi-221 cells.
(A) SpLi-221 cells were transfected with 2 μg dsRNA corresponding to vAcRev-iap3, SeOrf111 or gfp. At 24 h p.t., the transfected-cells were infected with vAcRev and then observed at 48 h p.i. (B) Cell viability of the treated cells at 48 h p.i. The mean values and standard deviation of three independent experiments are shown. All data were analyzed by t-test using independent samples. A P-value of less than 0.01 was considered very significant. *P ≤ 0.01. (C) Levels of mRNA and protein of vAcRev-iap3 were determined at 48 h p.i. by RT-PCR (a) or immunoblotting (b), respectively. Transcript levels were also determined for Se111 (c).
Figure 6vAcRev-iap3 gene expression analysis in vAcRev-infected cells.
(A) RT-PCR analysis of the temporal transcripts of vAcRev-iap3. Total RNAs were prepared from vAcRev-infected Hi5, Sf9, Se301 and SpLi-221 cells and were subjected to RT-PCR analysis using primers that amplify vAcRev-iap3, and gp64, vp39, host actin gene was amplified as a control. (B) Time course of vAcRev-IAP3 expression during vAcRev infection. 50 μg of total protein from vAcRev-infected cells at the indicated time points were separated on 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gel, and then analyzed by western blotting with mouse vAcRev-IAP3 or actin monoclonal antibody, visualized by goat anti-mouse IgG antibody conjugated with horseradish peroxidase and ECL. Time points p.i. hours are indicated above the lanes.
Figure 7Replication of constructed viruses carrying SeIAP3, Se111, or both genes.
(A) Schematic diagram of the constructed viruses. (B) Light micrographs of insect cells infected with indicated viruses at 72 h p.i.