Literature DB >> 27321045

The spatiotemporal hemodynamic response function for depth-dependent functional imaging of human cortex.

Alexander M Puckett1, Kevin M Aquino2, P A Robinson3, Michael Breakspear4, Mark M Schira5.   

Abstract

The gray matter of human cortex is characterized by depth-dependent differences in neuronal activity and connections (Shipp, 2007) as well as in the associated vasculature (Duvernoy et al., 1981). The resolution limit of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) measurements is now below a millimeter, promising the non-invasive measurement of these properties in awake and behaving humans (Muckli et al., 2015; Olman et al., 2012; Ress et al., 2007). To advance this endeavor, we present a detailed spatiotemporal hemodynamic response function (HRF) reconstructed through the use of high-resolution, submillimeter fMRI. We decomposed the HRF into directions tangential and perpendicular to the cortical surface and found that key spatial properties of the HRF change significantly with depth from the cortical surface. Notably, we found that the spatial spread of the HRF increases linearly from 4.8mm at the gray/white matter boundary to 6.6mm near the cortical surface. Using a hemodynamic model, we posit that this effect can be explained by the depth profile of the cortical vasculature, and as such, must be taken into account to properly estimate the underlying neuronal responses at different cortical depths.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hemodynamic response; High-resolution; Human; Layers; Visual cortex; fMRI

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27321045     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.06.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  9 in total

Review 1.  Analysis strategies for high-resolution UHF-fMRI data.

Authors:  Jonathan R Polimeni; Ville Renvall; Natalia Zaretskaya; Bruce Fischl
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-04-29       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 2.  Statistical power or more precise insights into neuro-temporal dynamics? Assessing the benefits of rapid temporal sampling in fMRI.

Authors:  Logan T Dowdle; Geoffrey Ghose; Clark C C Chen; Kamil Ugurbil; Essa Yacoub; Luca Vizioli
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2021-09-04       Impact factor: 11.685

3.  Simulating laminar neuroimaging data for a visual delayed match-to-sample task.

Authors:  Paul T Corbitt; Antonio Ulloa; Barry Horwitz
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 4.  New acquisition techniques and their prospects for the achievable resolution of fMRI.

Authors:  Saskia Bollmann; Markus Barth
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 11.685

Review 5.  How to Perform and Interpret Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies in Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders.

Authors:  In-Seon Lee; Hubert Preissl; Paul Enck
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2017-04-30       Impact factor: 4.924

6.  An in-vivo study of BOLD laminar responses as a function of echo time and static magnetic field strength.

Authors:  Irati Markuerkiaga; José P Marques; Lauren J Bains; David G Norris
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Cardiac cycle-induced EPI time series fluctuations in the brain: Their temporal shifts, inflow effects and T2 fluctuations.

Authors:  Olivia Viessmann; Harald E Möller; Peter Jezzard
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Linear systems analysis for laminar fMRI: Evaluating BOLD amplitude scaling for luminance contrast manipulations.

Authors:  Jelle A van Dijk; Alessio Fracasso; Natalia Petridou; Serge O Dumoulin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Validating Linear Systems Analysis for Laminar fMRI: Temporal Additivity for Stimulus Duration Manipulations.

Authors:  Jelle A van Dijk; Alessio Fracasso; Natalia Petridou; Serge O Dumoulin
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 3.020

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.