Literature DB >> 27320611

Osteoinduction of Calcium Phosphate Ceramics in Four Kinds of Animals for 1 Year: Dog, Rabbit, Rat, and Mouse.

L Cheng1, T Wang1, J Zhu1, P Cai2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Bone grafts are in great demand. Synthetic materials have been extensively studied as substitutes for autografts. Calcium phosphate ceramics are promising synthetic bone replacement materials. Because they share chemical similarities with human bone mineral, they show excellent biocompatibility and osteoinductivity.
OBJECTIVE: Calcium phosphate ceramics have been used to fill bone defects in preclinical study in a variety of animals. This study aimed to investigate the osteogenesis ability of calcium phosphate ceramics in 4 kinds of animals.
METHODS: Φ3 × 5 mm hydroxyapatite/β-tricalcium phosphate (HA/β-TCP) cylinders were implanted into the dorsal muscle of rats and mice, whereas Φ5 × 10 mm cylinders were implanted into the dorsal muscle of dogs and rabbits. One year after implantation, the ceramics were harvested to perform hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining and Masson-trichrome staining. The new bone tissues were observed and the area percentage of new bone was compared in the 4 kinds of animals.
RESULTS: A large number of new bone and bone marrow tissues were observed in dogs, rabbits, and mice, but not in rats; and the area percentage of new bone in mice was significantly higher than that in dogs and rabbits (P < .05). Calcium phosphate ceramics have good biocompability and biological safety, and the degree of ease of osteogenesis was as follows: mouse > dog > rabbit > rat.
CONCLUSION: To achieve better effects for bone transplantation, mouse should be chosen as the preferred experimental model based on these advantages: economic, convenience, and osteogenesis ability.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27320611     DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.09.065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplant Proc        ISSN: 0041-1345            Impact factor:   1.066


  5 in total

Review 1.  Biological properties of calcium phosphate biomaterials for bone repair: a review.

Authors:  Jingyi Lu; Huijun Yu; Chuanzhong Chen
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 4.036

2.  Bone Regeneration of Critical-Size Calvarial Defects in Rats Using Highly Pressed Nano-Apatite/Collagen Composites.

Authors:  Wataru Hatakeyama; Masayuki Taira; Tomofumi Sawada; Miki Hoshi; Yuki Hachinohe; Hirotaka Sato; Kyoko Takafuji; Hidemichi Kihara; Shinji Takemoto; Hisatomo Kondo
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-08       Impact factor: 3.748

Review 3.  The Components of Bone and What They Can Teach Us about Regeneration.

Authors:  Bach Quang Le; Victor Nurcombe; Simon McKenzie Cool; Clemens A van Blitterswijk; Jan de Boer; Vanessa Lydia Simone LaPointe
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 4.  Design Strategies and Biomimetic Approaches for Calcium Phosphate Scaffolds in Bone Tissue Regeneration.

Authors:  Federico Pupilli; Andrea Ruffini; Massimiliano Dapporto; Marta Tavoni; Anna Tampieri; Simone Sprio
Journal:  Biomimetics (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-13

5.  Heterotopic bone formation in the musculus latissimus dorsi of sheep using β-tricalcium phosphate scaffolds: evaluation of different seeding techniques.

Authors:  Simon Spalthoff; Rüdiger Zimmerer; Jan Dittmann; Horst Kokemüller; Marco Tiede; Laura Flohr; Philippe Korn; Nils-Claudius Gellrich; Philipp Jehn
Journal:  Regen Biomater       Date:  2017-11-27
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.