W-T Chen1, J-L Liang1, M-H Chen1, C-C Liao1, T-L Huang1, T-Y Chen1, L L-C Tsang1, H-Y Ou1, H-W Hsu1, M Z Lazo1, C-L Chen2, Y-F Cheng3. 1. Liver Transplantation Program, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. 2. Liver Transplantation Program, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. 3. Liver Transplantation Program, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. Electronic address: cheng.yufan@msa.hinet.net.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Vascular anatomy is essential in pretransplantation survey. The purpose of this study is to investigate the feasibility and diagnostic performance of inflow sensitive inversion recovery (IFIR) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) to evaluate the recipient's hepatic vasculature before liver transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-one pre-liver transplantation patients underwent both IFIR and conventional contrast-enhanced MRA using a 1.5T MR scanner from December 2012 to December 2014. The contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) between liver parenchyma and hepatic vasculature were calculated. The image sets of IFIR and contrast-enhanced MRA were assessed for subjective image quality and depiction of hepatic vasculature on vessel-to-vessel basis by two independent radiologists. RESULTS: The quantitative results of CNR for hepatic arteries on IFIR were significantly lower than contrast-enhanced MRA, whereas CNR for portal veins and inferior vena cava on IFIR were significantly higher than contrast-enhanced MRA. For subjective assessment of image quality, the overall agreement of scores of IFIR and contrast-enhanced MRA was substantial (kappa values ranged from 0.650 to 0.767). There was no significant difference in the image quality for portal veins between IFIR and contrast-enhanced MRA. The quality scores of IFIR were significantly lower than contrast-enhanced MRA for hepatic arteries. For inferior vena cava evaluation, the scores of IFIR were significantly higher than contrast-enhanced MRA. CONCLUSION: IFIR MRA is a reproducible and noninvasive tool to assess the hepatic vasculature that can provide adequate to good image quality. In pre-liver transplantation patients, IFIR MRA becomes even more useful if contrast medium is a contraindication due to impaired renal and liver functions.
OBJECTIVE: Vascular anatomy is essential in pretransplantation survey. The purpose of this study is to investigate the feasibility and diagnostic performance of inflow sensitive inversion recovery (IFIR) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) to evaluate the recipient's hepatic vasculature before liver transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-one pre-liver transplantation patients underwent both IFIR and conventional contrast-enhanced MRA using a 1.5T MR scanner from December 2012 to December 2014. The contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) between liver parenchyma and hepatic vasculature were calculated. The image sets of IFIR and contrast-enhanced MRA were assessed for subjective image quality and depiction of hepatic vasculature on vessel-to-vessel basis by two independent radiologists. RESULTS: The quantitative results of CNR for hepatic arteries on IFIR were significantly lower than contrast-enhanced MRA, whereas CNR for portal veins and inferior vena cava on IFIR were significantly higher than contrast-enhanced MRA. For subjective assessment of image quality, the overall agreement of scores of IFIR and contrast-enhanced MRA was substantial (kappa values ranged from 0.650 to 0.767). There was no significant difference in the image quality for portal veins between IFIR and contrast-enhanced MRA. The quality scores of IFIR were significantly lower than contrast-enhanced MRA for hepatic arteries. For inferior vena cava evaluation, the scores of IFIR were significantly higher than contrast-enhanced MRA. CONCLUSION: IFIR MRA is a reproducible and noninvasive tool to assess the hepatic vasculature that can provide adequate to good image quality. In pre-liver transplantation patients, IFIR MRA becomes even more useful if contrast medium is a contraindication due to impaired renal and liver functions.
Authors: Roberto Simonini; Pietro Andrea Bonaffini; Marco Porta; Cesare Maino; Francesco Saverio Carbone; Ludovico Dulcetta; Paolo Brambilla; Paolo Marra; Sandro Sironi Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2022-03-28