Norman Jones1,2, Ben Campion1,2, Mary Keeling3, Neil Greenberg1,2. 1. a Academic Department of Military Mental Health , and. 2. b Academic Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Weston Education Centre , London , UK , and. 3. c Center for Innovation and Research on Veterans and Military Families (CIR), School of Social Work, University of Southern California , Los Angeles , CA , USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Military research suggests a significant association between leadership, cohesion, mental health stigmatisation and perceived barriers to care (stigma/BTC). AIM: Most studies are cross sectional, therefore longitudinal data were used to examine the association of leadership and cohesion with stigma/BTC. METHOD: Military personnel provided measures of leadership, cohesion, stigma/BTC, mental health awareness and willingness to discuss mental health following deployment (n = 2510) and 4-6 months later (n = 1636). RESULTS: At follow-up, baseline leadership and cohesion were significantly associated with stigma/BTC; baseline cohesion alone was significantly associated with awareness of and willingness to discuss mental health at follow-up. Over time, changes in perceived leadership and cohesion were significantly associated with corresponding changes in stigma/BTC levels. Stigma/BTC content was similar in both surveys; fear of being viewed as weak and being treated differently by leaders was most frequently endorsed while thinking less of a help-seeking team member and unawareness of potential help sources were least common. CONCLUSION: Effective leadership and cohesion building may help to reduce stigma/BTC in military personnel. Mental health awareness and promoting the discussion of mental health matters may represent core elements of supportive leader behaviour. Perceptions of weakness and fears of being treated differently represent a focus for stigma/BTC reduction.
BACKGROUND: Military research suggests a significant association between leadership, cohesion, mental health stigmatisation and perceived barriers to care (stigma/BTC). AIM: Most studies are cross sectional, therefore longitudinal data were used to examine the association of leadership and cohesion with stigma/BTC. METHOD: Military personnel provided measures of leadership, cohesion, stigma/BTC, mental health awareness and willingness to discuss mental health following deployment (n = 2510) and 4-6 months later (n = 1636). RESULTS: At follow-up, baseline leadership and cohesion were significantly associated with stigma/BTC; baseline cohesion alone was significantly associated with awareness of and willingness to discuss mental health at follow-up. Over time, changes in perceived leadership and cohesion were significantly associated with corresponding changes in stigma/BTC levels. Stigma/BTC content was similar in both surveys; fear of being viewed as weak and being treated differently by leaders was most frequently endorsed while thinking less of a help-seeking team member and unawareness of potential help sources were least common. CONCLUSION: Effective leadership and cohesion building may help to reduce stigma/BTC in military personnel. Mental health awareness and promoting the discussion of mental health matters may represent core elements of supportive leader behaviour. Perceptions of weakness and fears of being treated differently represent a focus for stigma/BTC reduction.
Entities:
Keywords:
Mental Health; barriers to care; cohesion; leadership; military; stigmatisation
Authors: Katherine Petrie; Aimée Gayed; Bridget T Bryan; Mark Deady; Ira Madan; Anita Savic; Zoe Wooldridge; Isabelle Counson; Rafael A Calvo; Nicholas Glozier; Samuel B Harvey Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-05-23 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jo-Anne Puddephatt; Daniel Leightley; Laura Palmer; Norman Jones; Toktam Mahmoodi; Colin Drummond; Roberto J Rona; Nicola T Fear; Matt Field; Laura Goodwin Journal: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Date: 2019-05-24 Impact factor: 4.773