Literature DB >> 27319366

Sunshine Act: shedding light on inaccurate disclosures at a gynecologic annual meeting.

Jennifer C Thompson1, Katherine A Volpe1, Lindsay K Bridgewater1, Fares Qeadan2, Gena C Dunivan1, Yuko M Komesu1, Sara B Cichowski1, Peter C Jeppson1, Rebecca G Rogers3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Physicians and hospital systems often have relationships with biomedical manufacturers to develop new ideas, products, and further education. Because this relationship can influence medical research and practice, reporting disclosures are necessary to reveal any potential bias and inform consumers. The Sunshine Act was created to develop a new reporting system of these financial relationships called the Open Payments database. Currently all disclosures submitted with research to scientific meetings are at the discretion of the physician. We hypothesized that financial relationships between authors and the medical industry are underreported.
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to describe concordance between physicians' financial disclosures listed in the abstract book from the 41st annual scientific meeting of the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons to physician payments reported to the Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services Open Payments database for the same year. STUDY
DESIGN: Authors and scientific committee members responsible for the content of the 41st annual scientific meeting of the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons were identified from the published abstract book; each abstract listed disclosures for each author. Abstract disclosures were compared with the transactions recorded on the Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services Open Payments database for concordance. Two authors reviewed each nondisclosed Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services listing to determine the relatedness between the company listed on the Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services and abstract content.
RESULTS: Abstracts and disclosures of 335 physicians meeting inclusion criteria were reviewed. A total of 209 of 335 physicians (62%) had transactions reported in the Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services, which totaled $1.99 million. Twenty-four of 335 physicians (7%) listed companies with their abstracts; 5 of those 24 physicians were concordant with the Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services. The total amount of all nondisclosed transactions was $1.3 million. Transactions reported in the Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services associated with a single physician ranged from $11.72 to $405,903.36. Of the 209 physicians with Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services transactions that were not disclosed, the majority (68%) had at least 1 company listed in the Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services that was determined after review to be related to the subject of their abstract.
CONCLUSION: Voluntary disclosure of financial relationships was poor, and the majority of unlisted disclosures in the abstract book were companies related to the scientific content of the abstract. Better transparency is needed by physicians responsible for the content presented at gynecological scientific meetings.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Open Payments database; Sunshine Act; financial disclosures

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27319366      PMCID: PMC5207790          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.06.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  17 in total

1.  Of principles and pens: attitudes and practices of medicine housestaff toward pharmaceutical industry promotions.

Authors:  M A Steinman; M G Shlipak; S J McPhee
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 2.  Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Justin E Bekelman; Yan Li; Cary P Gross
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003 Jan 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Attitudes of medical school faculty toward gifts from the pharmaceutical industry.

Authors:  J W Banks; A G Mainous
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

5.  Accuracy of conflict-of-interest disclosures reported by physicians.

Authors:  Kanu Okike; Mininder S Kocher; Erin X Wei; Charles T Mehlman; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Physicians' behavior and their interactions with drug companies. A controlled study of physicians who requested additions to a hospital drug formulary.

Authors:  M M Chren; C S Landefeld
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-03-02       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Author Self-disclosure Compared with Pharmaceutical Company Reporting of Physician Payments.

Authors:  Hani A Alhamoud; Ramzi Dudum; Heather A Young; Brian G Choi
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  Source of funding and outcome of clinical trials.

Authors:  R A Davidson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1986 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Family physicians and generic drugs: a study of recognition, information sources, prescribing attitudes, and practices.

Authors:  A D Bower; G L Burkett
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 0.493

10.  A comparison of physicians' and patients' attitudes toward pharmaceutical industry gifts.

Authors:  R V Gibbons; F J Landry; D L Blouch; D L Jones; F K Williams; C R Lucey; K Kroenke
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  8 in total

1.  Assessment of Conflicts of Interest in Robotic Surgical Studies: Validating Author's Declarations With the Open Payments Database.

Authors:  Sunil V Patel; David Yu; Basheer Elsolh; Ben M Goldacre; Garrett M Nash
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  The Impact of Financial Conflict of Interest on Surgical Research: An Observational Study of Published Manuscripts.

Authors:  Deepa V Cherla; Cristina P Viso; Oscar A Olavarria; Karla Bernardi; Julie L Holihan; Krislynn M Mueck; Juan Flores-Gonzalez; Mike K Liang; Sasha D Adams
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  The Invisible Hand of Industry.

Authors:  X Mona Guo; Emma L Barber
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 1.966

4.  The Sun Is Still Shining: Nature of Industry Payments to Transplant Surgeons From 2014 to 2019.

Authors:  Conner V Lombardi; Jacob J Lang; Deklin Clayton; Puneet Sindhwani; Michael Rees; Obi Ekwenna
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2022-04-21

5.  Ten Years of Sports Health: Authorship Characteristics and Levels of Evidence.

Authors:  Ryan P Judy; Spencer Talentino; Asheesh Bedi; Bryson P Lesniak
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 3.843

6.  Accuracy of Disclosed Financial Relationships between Radiologists and Industry at the 2018 RSNA Annual Meeting.

Authors:  Ethan J Speir; Nancy K Hills; R Peter Lokken
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 29.146

7.  Payments by US pharmaceutical and medical device manufacturers to US medical journal editors: retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Jessica J Liu; Chaim M Bell; John J Matelski; Allan S Detsky; Peter Cram
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2017-10-26

8.  Drivers of the opioid crisis: An appraisal of financial conflicts of interest in clinical practice guideline panels at the peak of opioid prescribing.

Authors:  Sheryl Spithoff; Pamela Leece; Frank Sullivan; Nav Persaud; Peter Belesiotis; Liane Steiner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.