Maria Victorina López Varela1, Maria Montes de Oca2, Alejandra Rey3, Alejandro Casas4, Roberto Stirbulov5, Valentina Di Boscio6. 1. Faculty of Medicine, University of the Republic, Hospital Maciel, Montevideo, Uruguay. victorina.lopezvarela@gmail.com. 2. Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Caracas, Central University of Venezuela, Caracas, Venezuela. 3. Faculty of Medicine, University of the Republic, Montevideo, Uruguay. 4. Colombian Foundation of Pulmonology, Bogotá, Colombia. 5. Faculty of Medical Science of Santa Casa de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil. 6. Medical Affairs, AstraZeneca Latin America, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Opportunistic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) case finding approaches for high-risk individuals with or without symptoms is a feasible option for disease identification. PUMA is an opportunistic case finding study conducted in primary care setting of Argentina, Colombia, Venezuela and Uruguay. The objectives were to measure COPD prevalence in an at-risk population visiting primary care for any reason, to assess the yield of this opportunistic approach and the accuracy of a score developed to detect COPD. METHODS: Subjects attending routine primary care visits, ≥40 years of age, current or former smokers or exposed to biomass smoke, completed a questionnaire and performed spirometry. COPD was defined as post-bronchodilator (post-BD) forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1 )/forced vital capacity (FVC) < 0.70 and the lower limit of normal of FEV1 /FVC. RESULTS: A total of 1743 subjects completed the interview; 1540 performed acceptable spirometry. COPD prevalence was 20.1% (n = 309; ranging from 11.0% in Venezuela to 29.6% in Argentina) when defined using post-BD FEV1 /FVC < 0.70, and 14.7% (n = 226; ranging from 8.3% in Venezuela to 21.8% in Colombia) using the lower limit of normal. Logistic regression analysis for both definitions showed that the risk of COPD was significantly higher for persons >50 years, heavy smokers (>30 pack-years), with dyspnoea, and having prior spirometry. A simple score and a weighted score constructed using the following predictive factors: gender, age, pack-years smoking, dyspnoea, sputum, cough and spirometry, had a mean accuracy for detecting COPD (post-BD FEV1 /FVC < 0.70) of 76% and 79% for the simple and weighted scores, respectively. CONCLUSION: This simple seven-item score is an accurate screening tool to select subjects for spirometry in primary care.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Opportunistic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) case finding approaches for high-risk individuals with or without symptoms is a feasible option for disease identification. PUMA is an opportunistic case finding study conducted in primary care setting of Argentina, Colombia, Venezuela and Uruguay. The objectives were to measure COPD prevalence in an at-risk population visiting primary care for any reason, to assess the yield of this opportunistic approach and the accuracy of a score developed to detect COPD. METHODS: Subjects attending routine primary care visits, ≥40 years of age, current or former smokers or exposed to biomass smoke, completed a questionnaire and performed spirometry. COPD was defined as post-bronchodilator (post-BD) forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1 )/forced vital capacity (FVC) < 0.70 and the lower limit of normal of FEV1 /FVC. RESULTS: A total of 1743 subjects completed the interview; 1540 performed acceptable spirometry. COPD prevalence was 20.1% (n = 309; ranging from 11.0% in Venezuela to 29.6% in Argentina) when defined using post-BD FEV1 /FVC < 0.70, and 14.7% (n = 226; ranging from 8.3% in Venezuela to 21.8% in Colombia) using the lower limit of normal. Logistic regression analysis for both definitions showed that the risk of COPD was significantly higher for persons >50 years, heavy smokers (>30 pack-years), with dyspnoea, and having prior spirometry. A simple score and a weighted score constructed using the following predictive factors: gender, age, pack-years smoking, dyspnoea, sputum, cough and spirometry, had a mean accuracy for detecting COPD (post-BD FEV1 /FVC < 0.70) of 76% and 79% for the simple and weighted scores, respectively. CONCLUSION: This simple seven-item score is an accurate screening tool to select subjects for spirometry in primary care.
Authors: Juan J Olortegui-Rodriguez; David R Soriano-Moreno; Alejandro Benites-Bullón; Pilar P Pelayo-Luis; Jorge Huaringa-Marcelo Journal: BMC Pulm Med Date: 2022-07-16 Impact factor: 3.320
Authors: Lee Gazourian; William B Thedinger; Shawn M Regis; Elizabeth J Pagura; Lori Lyn Price; Melissa Gawlik; Cristina F Stefanescu; Carla Lamb; Kimberly M Rieger-Christ; Harpreet Singh; Marcel Casasola; Alexander R Walker; Arashdeep Rupal; Avignat S Patel; Carolyn E Come; Ava M Sanayei; William P Long; Giulia S Rizzo; Andrea B McKee; George R Washko; Raul San Jose Estepar; Christoph Wald; Brady J McKee; Carey C Thomson; Timothy N Liesching Journal: Respir Med Date: 2020-11-20 Impact factor: 3.415
Authors: Maria Montes de Oca; Carlos Aguirre; Maria Victorina Lopez Varela; Maria E Laucho-Contreras; Alejandro Casas; Filip Surmont Journal: Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Date: 2016-12-07
Authors: Esther Román-Conejos; Antonio Palazón-Bru; David Manuel Folgado-de la Rosa; Manuel Sánchez-Molla; María Mercedes Rizo-Baeza; Vicente Francisco Gil-Guillén; Ernesto Cortés-Castell Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-09-06 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Maria Victorina Lopez Varela; Maria Montes de Oca; Fernando C Wehrmeister; Cecilia Rodriguez; Larissa Ramirez; Ana Menezes Journal: Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Date: 2019-08-26
Authors: Laura Naranjo; Carlos A Torres-Duque; Daniel Colodenco; Gustavo Lopardo; Pablo Rodriguez; Aldo Agra de Albuquerque-Neto; Rafael J Hernandez-Zenteno; Luis Septien; Reynaldo Chandler; Eduardo Ortega-Barria; Patricia Juliao; Adriana Guzman-Holst Journal: Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Date: 2020-08-06