Susan Andersen1, Morten Hulvej Rod2, Annette Kjær Ersbøll3, Christiane Stock4, Christoffer Johansen5, Teresa Holmberg6, Line Zinckernagel7, Liselotte Ingholt8, Betina Bang Sørensen9, Janne Schurmann Tolstrup10. 1. Centre for Intervention Research in Health Promotion and Disease, National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Øster Farimagsgade 5A, DK-1353 Copenhagen, Denmark. Electronic address: sua@niph.dk. 2. Centre for Intervention Research in Health Promotion and Disease, National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Øster Farimagsgade 5A, DK-1353 Copenhagen, Denmark. Electronic address: mhj@niph.dk. 3. Centre for Intervention Research in Health Promotion and Disease, National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Øster Farimagsgade 5A, DK-1353 Copenhagen, Denmark. Electronic address: ake@niph.dk. 4. Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Niels Bohrs Vej 9, DK-6700 Esbjerg, Denmark. Electronic address: cstock@health.sdu.dk. 5. The Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. Electronic address: christof@cancer.dk. 6. Centre for Intervention Research in Health Promotion and Disease, National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Øster Farimagsgade 5A, DK-1353 Copenhagen, Denmark. Electronic address: tho@niph.dk. 7. Centre for Intervention Research in Health Promotion and Disease, National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Øster Farimagsgade 5A, DK-1353 Copenhagen, Denmark. Electronic address: lizi@niph.dk. 8. Centre for Intervention Research in Health Promotion and Disease, National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Øster Farimagsgade 5A, DK-1353 Copenhagen, Denmark. Electronic address: liin@niph.dk. 9. Centre for Intervention Research in Health Promotion and Disease, National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Øster Farimagsgade 5A, DK-1353 Copenhagen, Denmark. Electronic address: bbso@niph.dk. 10. Centre for Intervention Research in Health Promotion and Disease, National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Øster Farimagsgade 5A, DK-1353 Copenhagen, Denmark. Electronic address: jst@niph.dk.
Abstract
RATIONALE: School dropout and health risk behavior such as cigarette smoking represent major problems among students attending upper secondary vocational education. Modifications to the social environment may promote educational attainment as well as health and wellbeing of young people. However, there is a need for more evidence-based intervention programs. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of an intervention targeting the socio-environmental setting at vocational schools on student wellbeing and smoking. METHODS: We conducted a non-randomized controlled trial of 5794 students (mean age 21 years; 81% male) in 10 (four intervention and six comparison) large vocational schools in Denmark. The intervention involved changes in everyday school practices focusing on four themes: (i) introduction activities, (ii) daily class meetings, (iii) scheduled breaks and (iv) pleasant non-smoking environment. Outcomes were student wellbeing (four subscales: school connectedness, student support, teacher relatedness, positive valuing of the profession) and daily smoking measured at 10-week follow-up. RESULTS: We found statistically significant between-group difference in school connectedness, but not in student support, teacher relatedness and valuing the profession. The intervention had no effect on daily smoking. However, we found a statistically significant interaction between baseline smoking status and condition. This interaction suggested that baseline occasional smokers in the intervention group had significantly reduced odds ratio (OR) of becoming a daily smoker compared to baseline occasional smokers in the control group (8% versus 16%; OR = 0.44). CONCLUSION: The positive effects on school connectedness and in preventing occasional smokers becoming daily smokers indicate that it is possible to tackle school-related wellbeing and smoking in a high risk population through settings-based interventions.
RCT Entities:
RATIONALE: School dropout and health risk behavior such as cigarette smoking represent major problems among students attending upper secondary vocational education. Modifications to the social environment may promote educational attainment as well as health and wellbeing of young people. However, there is a need for more evidence-based intervention programs. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of an intervention targeting the socio-environmental setting at vocational schools on student wellbeing and smoking. METHODS: We conducted a non-randomized controlled trial of 5794 students (mean age 21 years; 81% male) in 10 (four intervention and six comparison) large vocational schools in Denmark. The intervention involved changes in everyday school practices focusing on four themes: (i) introduction activities, (ii) daily class meetings, (iii) scheduled breaks and (iv) pleasant non-smoking environment. Outcomes were student wellbeing (four subscales: school connectedness, student support, teacher relatedness, positive valuing of the profession) and daily smoking measured at 10-week follow-up. RESULTS: We found statistically significant between-group difference in school connectedness, but not in student support, teacher relatedness and valuing the profession. The intervention had no effect on daily smoking. However, we found a statistically significant interaction between baseline smoking status and condition. This interaction suggested that baseline occasional smokers in the intervention group had significantly reduced odds ratio (OR) of becoming a daily smoker compared to baseline occasional smokers in the control group (8% versus 16%; OR = 0.44). CONCLUSION: The positive effects on school connectedness and in preventing occasional smokers becoming daily smokers indicate that it is possible to tackle school-related wellbeing and smoking in a high risk population through settings-based interventions.
Authors: Michael Schreuders; Loekie Klompmaker; Bas van den Putte; Anton E Kunst Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-06-13 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Anneke Vang Hjort; Mirte A G Kuipers; Maria Stage; Charlotta Pisinger; Charlotte Demant Klinker Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-09-30 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Nanna W Stjernqvist; Marianne Sabinsky; Antony Morgan; Ellen Trolle; Camilla Thyregod; Helle T Maindal; Ane H Bonde; Inge Tetens Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2018-09-26 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Suzanne J van den Toren; Amy van Grieken; Marlou L A de Kroon; Wico C Mulder; Yvonne T M Vanneste; Hein Raat Journal: BMC Psychol Date: 2020-08-28
Authors: Charlotte Demant Klinker; Anna Aaby; Lene Winther Ringgaard; Anneke Vang Hjort; Melanie Hawkins; Helle Terkildsen Maindal Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-01-20 Impact factor: 3.390