Literature DB >> 2731838

Kinematics of the ankle/foot complex--Part 2: Pronation and supination.

A Lundberg1, O K Svensson, C Bylund, I Goldie, G Selvik.   

Abstract

The influence of pronation and supination of the foot on the joints of the ankle/foot complex was analyzed three dimensionally by roetgen stereophotogrammetry in eight healthy volunteers. Radiopaque markers were introduced into the tibia, talus, calcaneus, navicular, medial cuneiform, and first metatarsal bones. The subjects stood on a platform that was tilted in 10 degree-steps from 20 degrees of pronation to 20 degrees of supination. Pairs of x-ray exposure were made in each position. Calculation of resulting joint deviations from the neutral position showed that the largest amounts of motion occurred in the talonavicular joint followed by the talocalcaneal joint, in the latter case mainly in supination. The joints proximal and distal to the medial cunriform also participated substantially in the total motion registered. The tibia showed an average of 0.2 degrees of external rotation for each degree of supination of the foot.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2731838     DOI: 10.1177/107110078900900508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle        ISSN: 0198-0211


  13 in total

1.  Subject-specific models of the hindfoot reveal a relationship between morphology and passive mechanical properties.

Authors:  Carl W Imhauser; Sorin Siegler; Jayaram K Udupa; Jason R Toy
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 2.  Biomechanical analysis of the effect of orthotic shoe inserts: a review of the literature.

Authors:  M Razeghi; M E Batt
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Impact of various foot arches on dynamic balance and speed performance in collegiate short distance runners: A cross-sectional comparative study.

Authors:  Selvaraj Sudhakar; S Veena Kirthika; K Padmanabhan; G Mohan Kumar; C V Senthil Nathan; R Gopika; Asir John Samuel
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-02-02

4.  Changes in multi-segment foot biomechanics with a heat-mouldable semi-custom foot orthotic device.

Authors:  Reed Ferber; Brittany Benson
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 2.303

5.  A novel method for measuring in-shoe navicular drop during gait.

Authors:  Simon L Kappel; Michael S Rathleff; Dan Hermann; Ole Simonsen; Henrik Karstoft; Peter Ahrendt
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  The first tarsometatarsal joint and its association with hallux valgus.

Authors:  L W Mason; H Tanaka
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 5.853

7.  Lessons from dynamic cadaver and invasive bone pin studies: do we know how the foot really moves during gait?

Authors:  Christopher J Nester
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 2.303

8.  Effect of medial arch-heel support in inserts on reducing ankle eversion: a biomechanics study.

Authors:  Daniel Tp Fong; Mak-Ham Lam; Miko Lm Lao; Chad Wn Chan; Patrick Sh Yung; Kwai-Yau Fung; Pauline Py Lui; Kai-Ming Chan
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  The Relationship Between Foot and Pelvic Alignment While Standing.

Authors:  Sam Khamis; Gali Dar; Chava Peretz; Ziva Yizhar
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 2.193

10.  Reliability and concurrent validity of a novel method allowing for in-shoe measurement of navicular drop.

Authors:  Birgitte H Christensen; Kathrine S Andersen; Kristina S Pedersen; Britt S Bengtsen; Ole Simonsen; Simon L Kappel; Michael S Rathleff
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 2.303

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.