Literature DB >> 27318302

Long-Range Temporal Correlations in the amplitude of alpha oscillations predict and reflect strength of intracortical facilitation: Combined TMS and EEG study.

Tommaso Fedele1, Evgeny Blagovechtchenski2, Maria Nazarova3, Zafer Iscan4, Victoria Moiseeva4, Vadim V Nikulin5.   

Abstract

While variability of the motor responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is widely acknowledged, little is known about its central origin. One plausible explanation for such variability may relate to different neuronal states defining the reactivity of the cortex to TMS. In this study intrinsic spatio-temporal neuronal dynamics were estimated with Long-Range Temporal Correlations (LRTC) in order to predict the inter-individual differences in the strength of intra-cortical facilitation (ICF) and short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) produced by paired-pulse TMS (ppTMS) of the left primary motor cortex. LRTC in the alpha frequency range were assessed from multichannel electroencephalography (EEG) obtained at rest before and after the application of and single-pulse TMS (spTMS) and ppTMS protocols. For the EEG session, preceding TMS application, we showed a positive correlation across subjects between the strength of ICF and LRTC in the fronto-central and parietal areas. This in turn attests to the existence of subject-specific neuronal phenotypes defining the reactivity of the brain to ppTMS. In addition, we also showed that ICF was associated with the changes in neuronal dynamics in the EEG session after the application of the stimulation. This result provides a complementary evidence for the recent findings demonstrating that the cortical stimulation with sparse non-regular stimuli might have considerable long-lasting effects on the cortical activity.
Copyright © 2016 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG; TMS; motor cortex; neuronal dynamics; neuronal oscillations; variability

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27318302     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.06.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  8 in total

1.  Long-range temporal correlations in the brain distinguish conscious wakefulness from induced unconsciousness.

Authors:  Thomas Thiery; Tarek Lajnef; Etienne Combrisson; Arthur Dehgan; Pierre Rainville; George A Mashour; Stefanie Blain-Moraes; Karim Jerbi
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Pre-stimulus Alpha Oscillations and Inter-subject Variability of Motor Evoked Potentials in Single- and Paired-Pulse TMS Paradigms.

Authors:  Zafer Iscan; Maria Nazarova; Tommaso Fedele; Evgeny Blagovechtchenski; Vadim V Nikulin
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Characterizing the Cortical Oscillatory Response to TMS Pulse.

Authors:  Maria Concetta Pellicciari; Domenica Veniero; Carlo Miniussi
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 5.505

Review 4.  Concrete vs. Abstract Semantics: From Mental Representations to Functional Brain Mapping.

Authors:  Nadezhda Mkrtychian; Evgeny Blagovechtchenski; Diana Kurmakaeva; Daria Gnedykh; Svetlana Kostromina; Yury Shtyrov
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Patient, interrupted: MEG oscillation dynamics reveal temporal dysconnectivity in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Golnoush Alamian; Annalisa Pascarella; Tarek Lajnef; Laura Knight; James Walters; Krish D Singh; Karim Jerbi
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 4.881

6.  Fast acquisition of resting motor threshold with a stimulus-response curve - Possibility or hazard for transcranial magnetic stimulation applications?

Authors:  Elisa Kallioniemi; Friedemann Awiszus; Minna Pitkänen; Petro Julkunen
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol Pract       Date:  2021-12-17

7.  Neural Mechanisms of Cognitive Dissonance (Revised): An EEG Study.

Authors:  Marco Colosio; Anna Shestakova; Vadim V Nikulin; Evgeny Blagovechtchenski; Vasily Klucharev
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  In Standing, Corticospinal Excitability Is Proportional to COP Velocity Whereas M1 Excitability Is Participant-Specific.

Authors:  Tulika Nandi; Claudine J C Lamoth; Helco G van Keeken; Lisanne B M Bakker; Iris Kok; George J Salem; Beth E Fisher; Tibor Hortobágyi
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 3.169

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.