Literature DB >> 27317489

Soil drying procedure affects the DNA quantification of Lactarius vinosus but does not change the fungal community composition.

Carles Castaño1,2, Javier Parladé3, Joan Pera3, Juan Martínez de Aragón4, Josu G Alday5, José Antonio Bonet5,4.   

Abstract

Drying soil samples before DNA extraction is commonly used for specific fungal DNA quantification and metabarcoding studies, but the impact of different drying procedures on both the specific fungal DNA quantity and the fungal community composition has not been analyzed. We tested three different drying procedures (freeze-drying, oven-drying, and room temperature) on 12 different soil samples to determine (a) the soil mycelium biomass of the ectomycorrhizal species Lactarius vinosus using qPCR with a specifically designed TaqMan® probe and (b) the fungal community composition and diversity using the PacBio® RS II sequencing platform. Mycelium biomass of L. vinosus was significantly greater in the freeze-dried soil samples than in samples dried at oven and room temperature. However, drying procedures had no effect on fungal community composition or on fungal diversity. In addition, there were no significant differences in the proportions of fungi according to their functional roles (moulds vs. mycorrhizal species) in response to drying procedures. Only six out of 1139 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) had increased their relative proportions after soil drying at room temperature, with five of these OTUs classified as mould or yeast species. However, the magnitude of these changes was small, with an overall increase in relative abundance of these OTUs of approximately 2 %. These results suggest that DNA degradation may occur especially after drying soil samples at room temperature, but affecting equally nearly all fungi and therefore causing no significant differences in diversity and community composition. Despite the minimal effects caused by the drying procedures at the fungal community composition, freeze-drying resulted in higher concentrations of L. vinosus DNA and prevented potential colonization from opportunistic species.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drying treatment; Ectomycorrhizal biomass; Fungal community; Lactarius; Metabarcoding; qPCR

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27317489     DOI: 10.1007/s00572-016-0714-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mycorrhiza        ISSN: 0940-6360            Impact factor:   3.387


  28 in total

1.  Similar taxonomic richness but different communities of ectomycorrhizas in native forests and non-native plantation forests.

Authors:  Richard O'Hanlon; Thomas J Harrington
Journal:  Mycorrhiza       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 3.387

2.  UNITE: a database providing web-based methods for the molecular identification of ectomycorrhizal fungi.

Authors:  Urmas Kõljalg; Karl-Henrik Larsson; Kessy Abarenkov; R Henrik Nilsson; Ian J Alexander; Ursula Eberhardt; Susanne Erland; Klaus Høiland; Rasmus Kjøller; Ellen Larsson; Taina Pennanen; Robin Sen; Andy F S Taylor; Leho Tedersoo; Trude Vrålstad; Björn M Ursing
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 10.151

3.  Persistence of DNA of Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici in soil as measured by a DNA-based assay.

Authors:  Stephen Neate; Suha Jabaji-Hare; Kathy Ophel-Keller
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2004-02-01       Impact factor: 4.194

4.  Relocation, high-latitude warming and host genetic identity shape the foliar fungal microbiome of poplars.

Authors:  Miklós Bálint; László Bartha; Robert B O'Hara; Matthew S Olson; Jürgen Otte; Markus Pfenninger; Amanda L Robertson; Peter Tiffin; Imke Schmitt
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 6.185

5.  Thermal degradation of DNA.

Authors:  Moshe Karni; Dolev Zidon; Pazit Polak; Zeev Zalevsky; Orit Shefi
Journal:  DNA Cell Biol       Date:  2013-04-27       Impact factor: 3.311

6.  Tuber aestivum Vittad. mycelium quantified: advantages and limitations of a qPCR approach.

Authors:  Milan Gryndler; Jana Trilčová; Hana Hršelová; Eva Streiblová; Hana Gryndlerová; Jan Jansa
Journal:  Mycorrhiza       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 3.387

7.  Tracking mycorrhizas and extraradical mycelium of the edible fungus Lactarius deliciosus under field competition with Rhizopogon spp.

Authors:  Sara Hortal; Joan Pera; Javier Parladé
Journal:  Mycorrhiza       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 3.387

8.  The advantages of SMRT sequencing.

Authors:  Richard J Roberts; Mauricio O Carneiro; Michael C Schatz
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  A unique signal distorts the perception of species richness and composition in high-throughput sequencing surveys of microbial communities: a case study of fungi in indoor dust.

Authors:  Rachel I Adams; Anthony S Amend; John W Taylor; Thomas D Bruns
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 4.552

10.  Evaluation of the ISO standard 11063 DNA extraction procedure for assessing soil microbial abundance and community structure.

Authors:  Pierre Plassart; Sébastien Terrat; Bruce Thomson; Robert Griffiths; Samuel Dequiedt; Mélanie Lelievre; Tiffanie Regnier; Virginie Nowak; Mark Bailey; Philippe Lemanceau; Antonio Bispo; Abad Chabbi; Pierre-Alain Maron; Christophe Mougel; Lionel Ranjard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Mushroom Emergence Detected by Combining Spore Trapping with Molecular Techniques.

Authors:  Carles Castaño; Jonàs Oliva; Juan Martínez de Aragón; Josu G Alday; Javier Parladé; Joan Pera; José Antonio Bonet
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  The community composition variation of Russulaceae associated with the Quercus mongolica forest during the growing season at Wudalianchi City, China.

Authors:  Pengjie Xing; Yang Xu; Tingting Gao; Guanlin Li; Jijiang Zhou; Mengle Xie; Ruiqing Ji
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 2.984

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.