| Literature DB >> 27317315 |
Hongbo Yang1, Xufei Huang2, Qianqian Cai2, Chen Wang2, Xinxin Cao2, Daobin Zhou2, Jian Li3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: POEMS syndrome is a rare paraneoplastic syndrome due to an underlying plasma cell neoplasm. Hypogonadism is the most common endocrine abnormality in POEMS syndrome. There is no data about improvement of hypogonadism and sexual dysfunction after appropriate treatment of POEMS syndrome so far. In this single-center prospective study, the efficacy of low-dose lenalidomide and dexamethasone combination therapy in the improvement of sexual and gonadal function in POEMS syndrome was evaluated.Entities:
Keywords: Hypogonadism; Lenalidomide; POEMS syndrome; Sexual function
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27317315 PMCID: PMC4912786 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-016-0461-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Orphanet J Rare Dis ISSN: 1750-1172 Impact factor: 4.123
Fig. 1Mean FSFI distribution by domain before and after 12-month combination therapy. FSFI: Female Sexual Function Index. * p < 0.05
Changes in FSFI scores and laboratory parameters after 12-month combination therapy in Female patients
| Baseline ( | End of study ( | 95 % confidence interval of the diff ( |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | ||||
| FSFI Domains Desire | 5.6 ± 0.9 | 5.5 ± 1.0 | −0.9 | 0.6 | 0.468 |
| Arousal | 2.6 ± 1.9 | 4.6 ± 1.8 | 0.6 | 4.0 | 0.002* |
| Lubrication | 2.3 ± 1.9 | 3.3 ± 2.0 | −0.8 | 3.3 | 0.084 |
| Orgasm | 2.3 ± 1.9 | 3.5 ± 2.1 | −0.6 | 3.4 | 0.050* |
| Satisfaction | 2.4 ± 1.2 | 3.2 ± 2.0 | −0.6 | 2.1 | 0.112 |
| Pain | 2.0 ± 1.6 | 3.8 ± 2.4 | −0.7 | 4.8 | 0.046* |
| Total FSFI score | 17.1 ± 7.2 | 23.7 ± 7.2 | 1.5 | 13.6 | 0.003* |
| FSH (IU/L) | 12.38 ± 13.47 | 33.20 ± 28.75 | 4.45 | 61.95 | 0.067 |
| LH (IU/L) | 8.05 ± 9.09 | 17.26 ± 18.81 | −1.55 | 36.07 | 0.017* |
| E2 (pg/mL) | 81.92 ± 62.62 | 59.50 ± 92.79 | −93.99 | 113.69 | 0.771 |
| VEGF (pg/mL) | 6190.5 ± 3979.3 | 1468.2 ± 1495.4 | 908.7 | 8871.7 | 0.004* |
SD standard deviation
Severity of erectile dysfunction at baseline and at the end of study
| Baseline ( | End of study ( | |
|---|---|---|
| Severity of ED (EFD score),n% | ||
| Severe (<11) | 18(66.7) | 10(40.0) |
| Moderate (11 ~ 16) | 5(18.5) | 5(20.0) |
| Mild to moderate (17 ~ 21) | 1(3.7) | 1(4.0) |
| Mild (22 ~ 25) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) |
| Normal (>25) | 3(11.1) | 9(36.0) |
Fig. 2Mean IIEF distribution by domain before and after 12-month combination therapy * p < 0.05
Changes in IIEF scores and laboratory parameters after 12-month combination therapy in male patients
| Baseline ( | End of study ( | 95 % confidence interval of the diff ( |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | ||||
| IIEF Domains | |||||
| Erectile Function | 3.6 ± 5.4 | 7.3 ± 8.9 | −3.3 | 10.6 | 0.012* |
| Orgasmic Function | 2.2 ± 2.5 | 3.0 ± 3.2 | −1.7 | 3.4 | 0.106 |
| Sexual Desire | 2.6 ± 1.4 | 3.8 ± 2.6 | −1.1 | 3.6 | 0.012* |
| Intercourse Satisfaction | 0.9 ± 2.8 | 2.2 ± 3.6 | −0.4 | 3.9 | 0.022* |
| Overall Satisfaction | 3.6 ± 2.1 | 4.2 ± 2.6 | −2.1 | 3.4 | 0.228 |
| Total IIEF Score | 12.9 ± 13.0 | 20.5 ± 18.4 | −6.1 | 21.4 | 0.009* |
| FSH (IU/L) | 10.77 ± 12.51 | 19.32 ± 12.50 | 6.82 | 31.82 | 0.411 |
| LH (IU/L) | 8.32 ± 5.07 | 10.15 ± 9.45 | 0.70 | 19.60 | <0.001* |
| Total T (nmol/L) | 5.38 ± 3.23 | 11.30 ± 5.67 | −1.54 | 2.78 | <0.001* |
| VEGF (pg/mL) | 5965.0 ± 2860.3 | 1355.6 ± 1563.4 | 1422.4 | 7862.0 | <0.001* |