Literature DB >> 27317225

Evaluation for suspected acute appendicitis in the emergency department setting: a comparison of outcomes among three imaging pathways.

Andrew B Rosenkrantz1, Anthony Labib2, Luke A Ginocchio3, James S Babb4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare outcomes of imaging pathways in suspected acute appendicitis.
METHODS: Computerized tomography (CT) alone, ultrasound alone, and ultrasound followed by CT were compared in 570 emergency department (ED) patients with suspected acute appendicitis.
RESULTS: After initial ultrasound, 9.3% of men and 41.0% of women underwent CT. Body mass index (BMI) (P≤.036): 25.3±5.7kg/m(2) (CT), 19.1±3.3kg/m(2) (ultrasound), and 22.4±3.2kg/m(2) (ultrasound then CT). Age (P<.001): 35.9±14.5 years (CT), 12.8±6.2y (ultrasound), and 21.2±9.0 years (ultrasound then CT). ED length-of-stay: 7.0±2.8h (CT), 5.9±2.8h (ultrasound), and 8.4±3.5h (ultrasound then CT). Admission, same-day discharge, appendectomy, pathology positive for appendicitis or complicated appendicitis, 30-day repeat ED visit/hospitalization: no difference between pathways (P=.062-1.00).
CONCLUSION: Ultrasound, selected in patients with lowest age/BMI, had shortest length-of-stay but otherwise similar outcomes.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute appendicitis; CT; Emergency radiology; Outcomes; Ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27317225     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2016.02.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Imaging        ISSN: 0899-7071            Impact factor:   1.605


  1 in total

1.  Evaluating the risk of appendiceal perforation when using ultrasound as the initial diagnostic imaging modality in children with suspected appendicitis.

Authors:  Stephen Alerhand; James Meltzer; Ee Tein Tay
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2017-01-29
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.