Literature DB >> 2731722

Remarks on ascertainment.

W J Ewens1, N C Shute.   

Abstract

Genetic Analysis Workshop data come from various sources, with possibly different ascertainment procedures in each. It is plausible that classical ascertainment models do not accurately describe the ascertainment process in each data source. For this reason, we review the biases which can arise from an incorrect specification on the ascertainment process and discuss their relevance for the GAW5 data analysis.

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  1989        PMID： 2731722     DOI： 10.1002/gepi.1370060117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Epidemiol        ISSN： 0741-0395            Impact factor:   2.135


  2 in total

1.  Familial recurrence risk with varying amount of family history.

Authors:  Daniel J Schaid; Shannon K McDonnell; Stephen N Thibodeau
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.135

2.  Risks of Lynch syndrome cancers for MSH6 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Laura Baglietto; Noralane M Lindor; James G Dowty; Darren M White; Anja Wagner; Encarna B Gomez Garcia; Annette H J T Vriends; Nicola R Cartwright; Rebecca A Barnetson; Susan M Farrington; Albert Tenesa; Heather Hampel; Daniel Buchanan; Sven Arnold; Joanne Young; Michael D Walsh; Jeremy Jass; Finlay Macrae; Yoland Antill; Ingrid M Winship; Graham G Giles; Jack Goldblatt; Susan Parry; Graeme Suthers; Barbara Leggett; Malinda Butz; Melyssa Aronson; Jenny N Poynter; John A Baron; Loic Le Marchand; Robert Haile; Steve Gallinger; John L Hopper; John Potter; Albert de la Chapelle; Hans F Vasen; Malcolm G Dunlop; Stephen N Thibodeau; Mark A Jenkins
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 13.506
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.