Literature DB >> 27317102

Urological reconstruction after pelvic oncological surgery: A single institution experience.

Yu Guang Tan1, Grace Tan2, David Tan3, Claramae S Chia2, Dun Yong Ang2, Melissa C C Teo2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In locally advanced pelvic malignancies, there is often involvement of urological organs, necessitating resection and reconstruction, which can be associated with significant complications.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 20 patients undergoing urological reconstructions during pelvic oncological surgeries from January 2004 to December 2013. All patients had imaging-proven involvement of at least one urological organ preoperatively. Primary outcome was urological complication rate. Secondary outcomes were nonurological complication, recurrence rate, and overall survival.
RESULTS: Median age of presentation was 51 years. Six and 14 patients underwent resections for primary and secondary tumors, respectively. Colorectal tumors were the most common, followed by gynecological cancers. The ureter was the most common urological organ involved, followed by the bladder, prostate, and seminal vesicles. Reconstructive procedures included ileal and sigmoid conduits, ureteroneocystostomies, Boari flap, transureteroureterostomies (TUUs) and direct ureteroureterostomies. Six patients developed major urological complications, requiring endoscopic and surgical reinterventions. The follow-up time was 34 months. Thirteen patients developed recurrence, associated with higher tumor grade and lymphovascular invasion, and occurred at a median time of 10 months. These patients had an overall survival of 20 months, compared to 45 months in patients without recurrence.
CONCLUSION: Careful patient selection in pelvic oncological surgeries can significantly prolong survival. Recurrent tumors and greater intraoperative blood loss are associated with higher urological complications. A limited pelvic exenteration and lower radiation doses can reduce complication rates. If higher doses are necessary, conformal techniques and hyperfractionated radiotherapy should be explored. Urological reconstruction should be individualized, according to the extensiveness of urological involvement and exposure of radiation.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Taiwan.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27317102     DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2016.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian J Surg        ISSN: 1015-9584            Impact factor:   2.767


  2 in total

1.  The outcomes of isolated ureteral resection and reconstruction in non-urologic cancer patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery (CRC) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC).

Authors:  Şevket Barış Morkavuk; Murat Güner; Mesut Tez; Ali Ekrem Ünal
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 2.754

2.  A systematic approach for successful repair of radiated and non-radiated ureteral injuries.

Authors:  Matthew D Grimes; Morgan E Schubbe; Bradley A Erickson
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2022-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.