Literature DB >> 2731702

CT demonstration of the appendix in asymptomatic adults.

J C Scatarige1, D J DiSantis, H A Allen, M Miller.   

Abstract

We prospectively examined 103 consecutive adults (67 women, 36 men; mean age: 58.7 years) referred for abdominal and pelvic computed tomography (CT) in whom there was no history of right lower quadrant symptoms or appendectomy. Contiguous 5-mm CT images through the pericecal region were obtained in each subject, once routine scanning was completed. Three radiologists reviewed all CT images and reached a consensus on appendiceal visualization and the quantity of intraperitoneal fat. Statistical methods were applied to the collected data to seek significant associations between a visualized appendix and the following factors: patient age, sex, intraperitoneal fat grade, and the presence of oral contrast in the cecal lumen. The appendix was definitely visualized in only 45 of the 103 patients (43.7%). Analysis of variance revealed no statistically significant correlation between a CT-demonstrated appendix and the four variables examined. The clinical implications of these findings are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2731702     DOI: 10.1007/bf01889214

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2356


  14 in total

Review 1.  Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of the acute abdomen.

Authors:  M I Shaff; R W Tarr; C L Partain; A E James
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 2.741

2.  Frequency of visualization of the normal appendix with the barium enema examination.

Authors:  R P Sakover; R L Del Fava
Journal:  Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med       Date:  1974-06

3.  CT appearance of appendicitis and its local complications.

Authors:  M E Gale; S Birnbaum; S G Gerzof; G Sloan; W C Johnson; A H Robbins
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1985 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.826

4.  Periappendiceal inflammatory masses: CT-directed management and clinical outcome in 70 patients.

Authors:  R B Jeffrey; M P Federle; C S Tolentino
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Computed tomography and appendiceal abscess: special applicability in the elderly.

Authors:  B Jones; E K Fishman; S S Siegelman
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 1.826

6.  Role of computed tomography in diagnosis of appendiceal disorders.

Authors:  B Fish; J J Smulewicz; L Barek
Journal:  N Y State J Med       Date:  1981-05

7.  Acute appendicitis: US evaluation using graded compression.

Authors:  J B Puylaert
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  CT in the management of periappendiceal abscess.

Authors:  J A Barakos; R B Jeffrey; M P Federle; V W Wing; F C Laing; D R Hightower
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Computed tomography in complicated acute appendicitis.

Authors:  M A Feldberg; M J Hendriks; P F van Waes
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1985

10.  The value of the barium enema in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  A E Rajagopalan; J H Mason; M Kennedy; J Pawlikowski
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1977-04
View more
  3 in total

1.  Multidetector-row CT of the appendix in healthy adults.

Authors:  Pamela T Johnson; John Eng; Carolyn J Moore; Karen M Horton; Elliot K Fishman
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2006-07-04

2.  CT appearance of the normal appendix in adults.

Authors:  Stefania Tamburrini; Arturo Brunetti; Michèle Brown; Claude B Sirlin; Giovanna Casola
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-05-24       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  The normal appendix on CT: does size matter?

Authors:  Inneke Willekens; Els Peeters; Michel De Maeseneer; Johan de Mey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.