R Burgos-Pol1, J M Martínez-Sesmero2, J M Ventura-Cerdá3, I Elías4, M T Caloto5, M Á Casado4. 1. Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research Iberia (PORIB), Madrid, España. Electronic address: rburgos@porib.com. 2. Servicio de Farmacia, Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo, Toledo, España. 3. Servicio de Farmacia, Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset, Valencia, España. 4. Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research Iberia (PORIB), Madrid, España. 5. Celgene, S.L, Madrid, España.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: While the introduction of biologics has improved the quality of life of patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, it may have increased the economic burden of these diseases. OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review of studies on the costs associated with managing and treating psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis in 5 European countries: Germany, Spain, France, Italy, and the United Kingdom. METHODS: We undertook a systematic review of the literature (up to May 2015) using the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. The methodological quality of the studies identified was evaluated using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards checklist. We considered both direct costs (medical and nonmedical) and indirect costs, adjusted for country-specific inflation and converted to international dollars using purchasing power parity exchange rates for 2015 ($US PPP). RESULTS: The search retrieved 775 studies; 68.3% analyzed psoriasis and 31.7% analyzed psoriatic arthritis. The total annual cost per patient ranged from US $2,077 to US $13,132 PPP for psoriasis and from US $10,924 to US $17,050 PPP for psoriatic arthritis. Direct costs were the largest component of total expenditure in both diseases. The severity of these diseases was associated with higher costs. The introduction of biologics led to a 3-fold to 5-fold increase in direct costs, and consequently to an increase in total costs. CONCLUSIONS: We have analyzed the economic burden of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis and shown that costs increase with the treatment and management of more severe disease and the use of biologics.
INTRODUCTION: While the introduction of biologics has improved the quality of life of patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, it may have increased the economic burden of these diseases. OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review of studies on the costs associated with managing and treating psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis in 5 European countries: Germany, Spain, France, Italy, and the United Kingdom. METHODS: We undertook a systematic review of the literature (up to May 2015) using the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. The methodological quality of the studies identified was evaluated using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards checklist. We considered both direct costs (medical and nonmedical) and indirect costs, adjusted for country-specific inflation and converted to international dollars using purchasing power parity exchange rates for 2015 ($US PPP). RESULTS: The search retrieved 775 studies; 68.3% analyzed psoriasis and 31.7% analyzed psoriatic arthritis. The total annual cost per patient ranged from US $2,077 to US $13,132 PPP for psoriasis and from US $10,924 to US $17,050 PPP for psoriatic arthritis. Direct costs were the largest component of total expenditure in both diseases. The severity of these diseases was associated with higher costs. The introduction of biologics led to a 3-fold to 5-fold increase in direct costs, and consequently to an increase in total costs. CONCLUSIONS: We have analyzed the economic burden of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis and shown that costs increase with the treatment and management of more severe disease and the use of biologics.
Authors: Jacob P Thyssen; Andreas W Brenneche; Maria E Madsen; Mikkel H Pedersen; Dennis J Trangbaek; Christian Vestergaard Journal: Acta Derm Venereol Date: 2021-09-03 Impact factor: 3.875
Authors: Néboa Zozaya; Lucía Martínez-Galdeano; Bleric Alcalá; Jose Carlos Armario-Hita; Concepción Carmona; Jose Manuel Carrascosa; Pedro Herranz; María Jesús Lamas; Marta Trapero-Bertran; Álvaro Hidalgo-Vega Journal: BioDrugs Date: 2018-06 Impact factor: 5.807
Authors: Antonio Romero Pérez; Rubén Queiro; Daniel Seoane-Mato; Eduard Graell; Eugenio Chamizo; Lara Chaves Chaparro; Sara Rojas Herrera; Jordi Pons Dolset; Miguel A Polo Ostáriz; Susana Ruiz-Alejos Garrido; Cristina Macía-Villa; Ana Cruz-Valenciano; María L González Gómez; Carlos Sánchez-Piedra; Federico Díaz-González; Sagrario Bustabad-Reyes Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-06-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Giorgio L Colombo; Sergio Di Matteo; Chiara Martinotti; Steffen M Jugl; Praveen Gunda; Mariantonietta Naclerio; Giacomo M Bruno Journal: Clinicoecon Outcomes Res Date: 2018-08-30
Authors: L Degli Esposti; V Perrone; D Sangiorgi; D Alessandrini; S Buda; F Cantini; E Mazzini; C Toma; F De Solda Journal: Patient Prefer Adherence Date: 2019-01-22 Impact factor: 2.711
Authors: Nilcéia Lopes; Leticia L S Dias; Luna Azulay-Abulafia; Luiza K M Oyafuso; Maria Victoria Suarez; Lincoln Fabricio; Clarice Marie Kobata; Tania Cestari; Bernardo Gontijo; Cid Y Sabbag; João R Antonio; Ricardo Romiti; Patricia C Pertel Journal: Adv Ther Date: 2019-08-20 Impact factor: 3.845