Lorraine Krebs1, Sandy Amorin2, Pauline Brice2, Sophie Guillerm1, Jean Menard1, Christophe Hennequin1, Laurent Quéro3. 1. Radiation Oncology Department, Saint Louis Hospital, 1, Avenue Claude Vellefaux, 75010, Paris, France. 2. Hematooncology Department, Saint Louis Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France. 3. Radiation Oncology Department, Saint Louis Hospital, 1, Avenue Claude Vellefaux, 75010, Paris, France. laurent.quero@sls.aphp.fr.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Doses and volumes of radiation therapy (RT) for early stages of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) have been reduced over the last 30 years. Combined modality therapy (CMT) is currently the standard treatment for most patients with early-stage HL. The aim of this study was to analyze the site of relapse after RT according to the extent of radiation fields. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1987 and 2011, 427 patients were treated at our institution with RT ± chemotherapy for stage-I/II HL. Among these, 65 patients who experienced a relapse were retrospectively analyzed. Most patients had nodular sclerosis histology (86 %) and stage-II disease (75.9 %). Bulky disease was present in 21 % and 56 % of patients belonged to the unfavorable risk group according to European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)/The Lymphoma Study Association (LYSA) definitions. CMT was delivered to 91 % of patients. All patients received RT with doses ranging from 20 to 45 Gy (mean = 34 ± 5.3 Gy). The involved-field RT technique was used in 59 % of patients. RESULTS: The mean time between diagnosis and relapse was 4.2 years (range 0.3-24.5). Out-of-field relapses were suffered by 53 % of patients. Relapses occurred more frequently at out-of-field sites in patients with a favorable disease status, whereas in-field relapses were associated with bulky mediastinal disease. Relapses occurred later for favorable compared with the unfavorable risk group (3.5 vs. 2.9 years, p = 0.5). From multivariate analyses, neither RT dose nor RT field size were predictive for an in-field relapse (p = 0.25 and p = 0.8, respectively), only bulky disease was predictive (p = 0.018). CONCLUSION: In patients with bulky disease, RT dose and RT field size were not predictive for an in-field relapse. In this subgroup of patients, chemotherapy should be intensified. We confirmed the bad prognosis of early relapses.
PURPOSE: Doses and volumes of radiation therapy (RT) for early stages of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) have been reduced over the last 30 years. Combined modality therapy (CMT) is currently the standard treatment for most patients with early-stage HL. The aim of this study was to analyze the site of relapse after RT according to the extent of radiation fields. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1987 and 2011, 427 patients were treated at our institution with RT ± chemotherapy for stage-I/II HL. Among these, 65 patients who experienced a relapse were retrospectively analyzed. Most patients had nodular sclerosis histology (86 %) and stage-II disease (75.9 %). Bulky disease was present in 21 % and 56 % of patients belonged to the unfavorable risk group according to European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)/The Lymphoma Study Association (LYSA) definitions. CMT was delivered to 91 % of patients. All patients received RT with doses ranging from 20 to 45 Gy (mean = 34 ± 5.3 Gy). The involved-field RT technique was used in 59 % of patients. RESULTS: The mean time between diagnosis and relapse was 4.2 years (range 0.3-24.5). Out-of-field relapses were suffered by 53 % of patients. Relapses occurred more frequently at out-of-field sites in patients with a favorable disease status, whereas in-field relapses were associated with bulky mediastinal disease. Relapses occurred later for favorable compared with the unfavorable risk group (3.5 vs. 2.9 years, p = 0.5). From multivariate analyses, neither RT dose nor RT field size were predictive for an in-field relapse (p = 0.25 and p = 0.8, respectively), only bulky disease was predictive (p = 0.018). CONCLUSION: In patients with bulky disease, RT dose and RT field size were not predictive for an in-field relapse. In this subgroup of patients, chemotherapy should be intensified. We confirmed the bad prognosis of early relapses.
Authors: Evert M Noordijk; Patrice Carde; Noëlle Dupouy; Anton Hagenbeek; Augustinus D G Krol; Johanna C Kluin-Nelemans; Umberto Tirelli; Mathieu Monconduit; José Thomas; Houchingue Eghbali; Berthe M P Aleman; Jacques Bosq; Marjeta Vovk; Tom A M Verschueren; Anne-Marie Pény; Théodore Girinsky; John M M Raemaekers; Michel Henry-Amar Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-06-05 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jan Kriz; Gabriele Reinartz; Markus Dietlein; Carsten Kobe; Georg Kuhnert; Heinz Haverkamp; Uwe Haverkamp; Rita Engenhart-Cabillic; Klaus Herfarth; Peter Lukas; Heinz Schmidberger; Susanne Staar; Kira Hegerfeld; Christian Baues; Andreas Engert; Hans Theodor Eich Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2015-05-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: John M M Raemaekers; Marc P E André; Massimo Federico; Theodore Girinsky; Reman Oumedaly; Ercole Brusamolino; Pauline Brice; Christophe Fermé; Richard van der Maazen; Manuel Gotti; Reda Bouabdallah; Catherine J Sebban; Yolande Lievens; Allessandro Re; Aspasia Stamatoullas; Frank Morschhauser; Pieternella J Lugtenburg; Elisabetta Abruzzese; Pierre Olivier; Rene-Olivier Casasnovas; Gustaaf van Imhoff; Tiana Raveloarivahy; Monica Bellei; Thierry van der Borght; Stephane Bardet; Annibale Versari; Martin Hutchings; Michel Meignan; Catherine Fortpied Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-03-17 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: S Sasse; B Klimm; H Görgen; M Fuchs; A Heyden-Honerkamp; A Lohri; O Koch; M Wilhelm; G Trenn; J Finke; R P Müller; V Diehl; H T Eich; P Borchmann; A Engert Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2012-07-05 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Hans Theodor Eich; Volker Diehl; Helen Görgen; Thomas Pabst; Jana Markova; Jürgen Debus; Anthony Ho; Bernd Dörken; Andreas Rank; Anca-Ligia Grosu; Thomas Wiegel; Johann Hinrich Karstens; Richard Greil; Normann Willich; Heinz Schmidberger; Hartmut Döhner; Peter Borchmann; Hans-Konrad Müller-Hermelink; Rolf-Peter Müller; Andreas Engert Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-08-16 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Andreas Engert; Petra Schiller; Andreas Josting; Richard Herrmann; Peter Koch; Markus Sieber; Friederike Boissevain; Maike De Wit; Jorg Mezger; Eckhart Duhmke; Normann Willich; Rolf-Peter Muller; Bernhard F Schmidt; Helmut Renner; Hans Konrad Muller-Hermelink; Beate Pfistner; Jurgen Wolf; Dirk Hasenclever; Markus Loffler; Volker Diehl Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-08-11 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Belinda A Campbell; Nick Voss; Tom Pickles; James Morris; Randy D Gascoyne; Kerry J Savage; Joseph M Connors Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-10-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: C Baues; R Semrau; U S Gaipl; P J Bröckelmann; J Rosenbrock; A Engert; S Marnitz Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2016-10-04 Impact factor: 3.621