| Literature DB >> 27316346 |
Timothy S Naimi1,2, Timothy Stockwell3, Jinhui Zhao3, Ziming Xuan2, Frida Dangardt4, Rich Saitz3, Wenbin Liang5, Tanya Chikritzhs5.
Abstract
Selection biases may lead to systematic overestimate of protective effects from 'moderate' alcohol consumption. Overall, most sources of selection bias favor low-volume drinkers in relation to non-drinkers. Studies that attempt to address these types of bias generally find attenuated or non-significant relationships between low-volume alcohol consumption and cardiovascular disease, which is the major source of possible protective effects on mortality from low-volume consumption. Furthermore, observed mortality effects among established low-volume consumers are of limited relevance to health-related decisions about whether to initiate consumption or to continue drinking purposefully into old age. Short of randomized trials with mortality end-points, there are a number of approaches that can minimize selection bias involving low-volume alcohol consumption.Entities:
Keywords: Alcohol; bias; epidemiology; moderate drinking; mortality; selection bias
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27316346 DOI: 10.1111/add.13451
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Addiction ISSN: 0965-2140 Impact factor: 6.526