Yunis Mayasi1, Johanna Helenius1, Richard P Goddeau1, Majaz Moonis1, Nils Henninger2. 1. Department of Neurology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts. 2. Department of Neurology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts; Department of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts. Electronic address: nils.henninger@umassmed.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Delayed thrombolysis adversely impacts functional outcome after stroke. Therefore, great efforts are undertaken to reduce delay in patient presentation and initiate treatment as quickly as possible. However, little is known regarding the impact of time to presentation (TTP) on outcome in patients who are ineligible for acute stroke therapy. Thus, we sought to determine whether the TTP is associated with the 90-day outcome irrespective of eligibility for acute recanalization therapy. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 258 consecutive acute ischemic stroke patients evaluated between January 2013 and February 2014. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine whether a greater TTP is independently associated with a poor 90-day outcome defined as a modified Rankin scale (mRS) score of 3-6. RESULTS: In the unadjusted analyses, the TTP was inversely correlated with transfer from an acute facility (r = -.126, P = .043), cardioembolic stroke etiology (r = -.146, P = .019), and acute recanalization therapy (r = .-412, P < .001). Conversely, a longer TTP was correlated with a worse 90-day mRS score (r = .127, P = .045). After adjustment, the TTP (P = .019), age (P < .001), female sex (P = .001), National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (P < .001), preadmission mRS score (P = .001), atrial fibrillation (P < .001), and infarct volume (P < .001) were independently associated with a poor 90-day outcome. Importantly, a longer TTP (odds ratio 1.016, 95% confidence interval 1.001-1.032, P = .036) remained independently associated with the 90-day outcome when we restricted the analyses to patients ineligible for acute intravenous and endovascular recanalization therapies. CONCLUSIONS: Each hour delay in the TTP decreased chances for good outcome by approximately 2% independent of patient eligibility for acute recanalization therapies.
BACKGROUND: Delayed thrombolysis adversely impacts functional outcome after stroke. Therefore, great efforts are undertaken to reduce delay in patient presentation and initiate treatment as quickly as possible. However, little is known regarding the impact of time to presentation (TTP) on outcome in patients who are ineligible for acute stroke therapy. Thus, we sought to determine whether the TTP is associated with the 90-day outcome irrespective of eligibility for acute recanalization therapy. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 258 consecutive acute ischemic strokepatients evaluated between January 2013 and February 2014. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine whether a greater TTP is independently associated with a poor 90-day outcome defined as a modified Rankin scale (mRS) score of 3-6. RESULTS: In the unadjusted analyses, the TTP was inversely correlated with transfer from an acute facility (r = -.126, P = .043), cardioembolic stroke etiology (r = -.146, P = .019), and acute recanalization therapy (r = .-412, P < .001). Conversely, a longer TTP was correlated with a worse 90-day mRS score (r = .127, P = .045). After adjustment, the TTP (P = .019), age (P < .001), female sex (P = .001), National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (P < .001), preadmission mRS score (P = .001), atrial fibrillation (P < .001), and infarct volume (P < .001) were independently associated with a poor 90-day outcome. Importantly, a longer TTP (odds ratio 1.016, 95% confidence interval 1.001-1.032, P = .036) remained independently associated with the 90-day outcome when we restricted the analyses to patients ineligible for acute intravenous and endovascular recanalization therapies. CONCLUSIONS: Each hour delay in the TTP decreased chances for good outcome by approximately 2% independent of patient eligibility for acute recanalization therapies.
Authors: J R Marler; B C Tilley; M Lu; T G Brott; P C Lyden; J C Grotta; J P Broderick; S R Levine; M P Frankel; S H Horowitz; E C Haley; C A Lewandowski; T P Kwiatkowski Journal: Neurology Date: 2000-12-12 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Jeffrey L Saver; Mayank Goyal; Alain Bonafe; Hans-Christoph Diener; Elad I Levy; Vitor M Pereira; Gregory W Albers; Christophe Cognard; David J Cohen; Werner Hacke; Olav Jansen; Tudor G Jovin; Heinrich P Mattle; Raul G Nogueira; Adnan H Siddiqui; Dileep R Yavagal; Blaise W Baxter; Thomas G Devlin; Demetrius K Lopes; Vivek K Reddy; Richard du Mesnil de Rochemont; Oliver C Singer; Reza Jahan Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-04-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Amrou Sarraj; Sarah Medrek; Karen Albright; Sheryl Martin-Schild; Wafi Bibars; Farhaan Vahidy; James C Grotta; Sean I Savitz Journal: Int J Stroke Date: 2013-03-22 Impact factor: 5.266
Authors: Seo Hyun Kim; Ji-Yong Lee; Do Han Kim; Jee Hyun Ham; Young Ki Song; Eun Ju Lim; Chan Ik Park; Sei-Jin Chang; Sung-Soo Lee Journal: Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2013-07-30 Impact factor: 2.762