Literature DB >> 27315664

Course of Quality of Life After Radiation Therapy for Painful Bone Metastases: A Detailed Analysis From the Dutch Bone Metastasis Study.

Paulien G Westhoff1, Mathilde G E Verdam2, Frans J Oort3, Jan J Jobsen4, Marco van Vulpen5, Jan Willem H Leer6, Corrie A M Marijnen7, Alexander de Graeff8, Yvette M van der Linden7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To study the course of quality of life (QoL) after radiation therapy for painful bone metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Dutch Bone Metastasis Study randomized 1157 patients with painful bone metastases between a single fraction of 8 Gy and 6 fractions of 4 Gy between 1996 and 1998. The study showed a comparable pain response of 74%. Patients filled out weekly questionnaires for 13 weeks, then monthly for 2 years. In these analyses, physical, psychosocial, and functional QoL domain scores and a score of general health were studied. Mixed modeling was used to model the course of QoL and to study the influence of several characteristics.
RESULTS: In general, QoL stabilized after 1 month. Psychosocial QoL improved after treatment. The level of QoL remained stable, steeply deteriorating at the end of life. For most QoL domains, a high pain score and intake of opioids were associated with worse QoL, with small effect sizes (-0.11 to -0.27). A poor performance score was associated with worse functional QoL, with a medium effect size (0.41). There is no difference in QoL between patients receiving a single fraction of 8 Gy and 6 fractions of 4 Gy, except for a temporary worsening of physical QoL after 6 fractions.
CONCLUSION: Although radiation therapy for painful bone metastases leads to a meaningful pain response, most domains of QoL do not improve after treatment. Only psychosocial QoL improves slightly after treatment. The level of QoL is related to the actual survival, with a rather stable course of QoL for most of the remaining survival time and afterward a sharp decrease, starting only a few weeks before the end of life. Six fractions of 4 Gy lead to a temporary worse physical QoL compared with a single fraction of 8 Gy.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27315664     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.03.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  10 in total

1.  Does dissemination of guidelines alone increase the use of palliative single-fraction radiotherapy? Initial report of a longitudinal change management campaign at a provincial cancer program.

Authors:  J O Kim; N Hanumanthappa; Y T Chung; J Beck; R Koul; B Bashir; A Cooke; A Dubey; J Butler; M Nashed; W Hunter; A Ong
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 2.  Metastatic Osseous Pain Control: Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Josephine Kang; Silvia C Formenti
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 1.513

3.  Reducing pain in children with cancer: Methodology for the development of a clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  Erik A H Loeffen; Leontien C M Kremer; Marianne D van de Wetering; Renée L Mulder; Anna Font-Gonzalez; Lee L Dupuis; Fiona Campbell; Wim J E Tissing
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 3.838

4.  Evaluation of Quality of Life Outcomes Following Palliative Treatment of Bone Metastases with Magnetic Resonance-guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound: An International Multicentre Study.

Authors:  D Harding; S L Giles; M R D Brown; G R Ter Haar; M van den Bosch; L W Bartels; Y-S Kim; M Deppe; N M deSouza
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 4.126

5.  Combining radiotherapy and focused ultrasound for pain palliation of cancer induced bone pain; a stage I/IIa study according to the IDEAL framework.

Authors:  Marcia M T J Bartels; Inez M Verpalen; Cyril J Ferrer; Derk J Slotman; Erik C J Phernambucq; Joost J C Verhoeff; Wietse S C Eppinga; Manon N G J A Braat; Rolf D van den Hoed; Miranda van 't Veer-Ten Kate; Erwin de Boer; Harry R Naber; Ingrid M Nijholt; Lambertus W Bartels; Clemens Bos; Chrit T W Moonen; Martijn F Boomsma; Helena M Verkooijen
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-01-15

6.  Quality-of-life and toxicity in cancer patients treated with multiple courses of radiation therapy.

Authors:  Maiwand Ahmadsei; Sebastian M Christ; Annina Seiler; Eugenia Vlaskou Badra; Jonas Willmann; Caroline Hertler; Matthias Guckenberger
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-03-15

7.  Quality of life improvement in patients with bone metastases undergoing palliative radiotherapy.

Authors:  Verónica Cañón; Alfonso Gómez-Iturriaga; Francisco Casquero; Dirk Rades; Arturo Navarro; Olga Del Hoyo; Virginia Morillo; Patricia Willisch; José Luis López-Guerra; Ana Illescas-Vacas; Raquel Ciervide; Lorea Martinez-Indart; Jon Cacicedo
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2022-07-29

8.  Analysis of curative effect of I125 implantation combined with radiofrequency ablation in treating bone metastases.

Authors:  Qizhou Zhang; Kunyao Zhang; Bing Xie; Yimin Ren; Guoliang Li; Liping Zhang; Aijing Wang; Yang Li
Journal:  J Bone Oncol       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 4.072

9.  Evaluation of effectiveness of palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Joanne M van der Velden; Yvette M van der Linden; Anne L Versteeg; Jorrit-Jan Verlaan; A Sophie Gerlich; Bart J Pielkenrood; Nicolien Kasperts; Helena M Verkooijen
Journal:  J Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-11-10

10.  Efficacy and safety of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound for the treatment of painful bone metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joe D Baal; William C Chen; Ulysis Baal; Sagar Wagle; Jed H Baal; Thomas M Link; Matthew D Bucknor
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.199

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.