PURPOSE: In the Noise Outcomes in Servicemembers Epidemiology Study, Veterans recently separated from the military undergo comprehensive assessments to initiate long-term monitoring of their auditory function. We developed the Tinnitus Screener, a four-item algorithmic instrument that determines whether tinnitus is present and, if so, whether it is constant or intermittent, or whether only temporary tinnitus has been experienced. Predictive validity data are presented for the first 100 Noise Outcomes in Servicemembers Epidemiology Study participants. METHOD: The Tinnitus Screener was administered to participants by telephone. In lieu of a gold standard for determining tinnitus presence, the predictive validity of the tinnitus category assigned to participants on the basis of the Screener results was assessed when the participants attended audiologic testing. RESULTS: Of the 100 participants, 67 screened positive for intermittent or constant tinnitus. Three were categorized as "temporary" tinnitus only, and 30 were categorized as "no tinnitus." Tinnitus categorization was predictively valid with 96 of the 100 participants. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide preliminary evidence that the Screener may be suitable for quickly determining essential parameters of reported tinnitus. We have since revised the instrument to differentiate acute from chronic tinnitus and to identify occasional tinnitus. We are also obtaining measures that will enable assessment of its test-retest reliability.
PURPOSE: In the Noise Outcomes in Servicemembers Epidemiology Study, Veterans recently separated from the military undergo comprehensive assessments to initiate long-term monitoring of their auditory function. We developed the Tinnitus Screener, a four-item algorithmic instrument that determines whether tinnitus is present and, if so, whether it is constant or intermittent, or whether only temporary tinnitus has been experienced. Predictive validity data are presented for the first 100 Noise Outcomes in Servicemembers Epidemiology Study participants. METHOD: The Tinnitus Screener was administered to participants by telephone. In lieu of a gold standard for determining tinnitus presence, the predictive validity of the tinnitus category assigned to participants on the basis of the Screener results was assessed when the participants attended audiologic testing. RESULTS: Of the 100 participants, 67 screened positive for intermittent or constant tinnitus. Three were categorized as "temporary" tinnitus only, and 30 were categorized as "no tinnitus." Tinnitus categorization was predictively valid with 96 of the 100 participants. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide preliminary evidence that the Screener may be suitable for quickly determining essential parameters of reported tinnitus. We have since revised the instrument to differentiate acute from chronic tinnitus and to identify occasional tinnitus. We are also obtaining measures that will enable assessment of its test-retest reliability.
Authors: Angela C Garinis; Gayla L Poling; Ronald C Rubenstein; Dawn Konrad-Martin; Timothy E Hullar; David M Baguley; Holly L Burrows; Jennifer A Chisholm; Amy Custer; Laura Dreisbach Hawe; Lisa L Hunter; Theodore K Marras; Candice E Ortiz; Lucretia Petersen; Peter S Steyger; Kevin Winthrop; Erika M Zettner; Khaya Clark; Michelle Hungerford; Jay J Vachhani; Carmen C Brewer Journal: Am J Audiol Date: 2021-09-22 Impact factor: 1.636
Authors: Cynthia C Morton; Mary L Marazita; Beate Peter; Mabel L Rice; Shelly Jo Kraft; Julie Barkmeier-Kraemer; Carey Balaban; Michael Phillips; Jennifer Schoden; Deborah Maiese; Tabitha Hendershot; Carol M Hamilton Journal: Ann Hum Genet Date: 2021-09-28 Impact factor: 2.180