Literature DB >> 27314321

A New One-Pot Synthesis of Quinoline-2-carboxylates under Heterogeneous Conditions.

Serena Gabrielli1, Alessandra Giardinieri2, Susanna Sampaolesi3, Roberto Ballini4, Alessandro Palmieri5.   

Abstract

Quinoline-2-carboxylates are an important subclass of n class="Chemical">quinoline derivatives largely present in a variety of biologically active molecules, as well as useful ligands in metal-catalyzed reactions. Herein, we present a new one-pot protocol for synthesizing this class of derivatives starting from β-nitroacrylates and 2-aminobenzaldehydes. In order to optimize the protocol, we investigated several reaction conditions, obtaining the best results using the 2-tert-Butylimino-2-diethylamino-1,3-dimethylperhydro-1,3,2-diazaphosphorine (BEMP) as solid base, in acetonitrile. Finally, we demonstrated the generality of our approach over several substrates which led to synthesize a plethora of functionalized quinolines-2-carboxylate derivatives in good overall yields.

Entities:  

Keywords:  heterocycles; one-pot processes; quinolines; solid supported reagents; β-nitroacrylates

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27314321      PMCID: PMC6273069          DOI: 10.3390/molecules21060776

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Molecules        ISSN: 1420-3049            Impact factor:   4.411


1. Introduction

Quinoline constitutes one of the most important n class="Chemical">nitrogen-containing heterocyclic compounds possessing several biological activities such as anti-bacterial, anti-fungal, anti-malarial, anti-convulsant, anti-inflammatory, anthelmintic, cardiotonic and analgesic [1]. In addition, the quinolinic nucleus is largely occurring in natural compounds and deeply investigated as building blocks for synthesizing highly functionalized materials [2,3]. In particular, quinoline-2-carboxylates play a predominant role as precursor of biologically active molecules [4,5,6,7,8] and as useful ligands in metal-catalyzed reactions [9,10]. Due to their importance, over the years, a variety of synthetic methodologies have been reported in the literature, which can be classified (Scheme 1) in: (i) oxidative processes, starting from the corresponding 2-methyl or 2-carbonyl quinolines [11,12]; (ii) hydrolytic reactions of cyano precursors [13]; (iii) metal-catalyzed cyclization, starting from N-aryl glycine derivatives or iminoethyl glyoxylates [14,15]; (iv) one-pot reduction-cyclization processes of 2-acylnitroarenes with α-oxoesters [16]; (v) carboxylation reactions of 2-chloro quinoline derivatives [17]; and (vi) the historical Doebner-Von Miller protocol [18].
Scheme 1

Main synthetic approaches for synthesizing quinoline-2-carboxylate derivatives.

Nevertheless, several of the reported procedures present some limitations such as restricted applicability (only few examples were reported) [11,12,13,18], low overall yields [16] and harsh reaction conditions [17]. Hence, new simple and general protocols for synthesizing these derivatives would surely be welcome. In this context, following our studies on the chemistry of β-nitroacrylates as valuable precursors of heterocycle systems [19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27], we propose their application as strategic starting materials, in combination with n class="Chemical">2-aminobenzaldheydes, for synthesizing quinoline-2-carboxylates. The idea was to develop a new one-pot process involving four different reactions: (i) an aza-Michael addition between the 2-aminobenzaldheydes 1 and β-nitroacrylates 2; followed by (ii) an intramolecular Henry reaction to give the benzopiperidines 3; (iii) elimination of water; and (iv) nitrous acid elimination to provide the aromatization of the piperidine core, and thus the formation of title targets 4 (Scheme 2).
Scheme 2

Synthetic approach for synthesizing quinoline-2-carboxylate derivatives 4.

2. Results and Discussion

In order to study the reaction, we first synthesized the starting materials (Scheme 3). 2-Aminobenzaldheydes were prepared from the corresponding n class="Chemical">alcohols or nitro precursors [28,29], while β-nitroacrylates were synthesized by the Henry reaction-elimination process, starting from nitroalkanes and alkyl glyoxalates [30,31].
Scheme 3

Synthesis of starting materials 1 and 2.

Once the starting materials were prepared, we switched our attention to optimize the process. Thus, first we studied the “aza-Michael-Henry domino process” between n class="Chemical">2-aminobenzaldheyde 1a and ethyl-3-nitropent-2-enoate 2a (Table 1). Based on our previous experiences, we started testing the reaction under promoter-free and solvent-free conditions and, after a series of trials, the best result was obtained using a slight excess of 2a (1.1 equivalent) at 70 °C (3aa, 66%, entry 7, the presence of solvents or bases makes the reaction unproductive entry 9–12).
Table 1

Optimization studies concerning the “aza-Michael-Henry domino process”.

Entry1a (mmol)2a (mmol)SolventTemp. (°C)Time (h)Yield (%) 1
Entry 111-r.t.24Traces
Entry 211-502444
Entry 311-602451
Entry 411-701861
Entry 511-801852
Entry 61.11-701859
Entry 711.1-701866
Entry 811.2-701864
Entry 911.1MeCN701811
Entry 1011.1EtOAc70189
Entry 1111.1-701821 2
Entry 1211.1-70188 3

1 Yield of pure isolated product; 2 The reaction was performed in the presence of 1 eq. of TMG; 3 The reaction was performed in the presence of 1 eq. of Et3N.

Successively, we studied the conversion of 3aa into 4aa (Table 2) and, after deep screening in terms of bases, solvents and temperature, we found the best yield of 4aa (86%, entry 8) at 50 °C, in n class="Chemical">acetonitrile using 1.25 equivalents of BEMP on polymer [32].
Table 2

Optimization studies concerning aromatization step.

EntryBase (eq.)SolventTemp. (°C)Time (h)Yield (%) 1
Entry 1TMG (1)MeCN502447
Entry 2DBU (1)MeCN502436
Entry 3Amberlyst A21 (1)MeCN5024Traces
Entry 4TBD on polymer (1)MeCN502462
Entry 5Carbonate on polymer (1)MeCN502457
Entry 6BEMP on polymer (1)MeCN502479
Entry 7BEMP on polymer (0.8)MeCN502467
Entry 8BEMP on polymer (1.25)MeCN502486
Entry 9BEMP on polymer (1.5)MeCN502482
Entry 10BEMP on polymer (1.25)MeCN402469
Entry 11BEMP on polymer (1.25)MeCN602485
Entry 12BEMP on polymer (1.25)EtOAc502471
Entry 13BEMP on polymer (1.25)2-MeTHF502447
Entry 14BEMP on polymer (1.25)Toluene50 2439

1 Yield of pure isolated product.

At that point, in order to achieve a one-pot process, we combined the two steps obtaining the quinoline 4aa in 58% of overall yield (Scheme 4).
Scheme 4

One-pot process.

Finally, with the aim to demonstrate the generality of our method, we tested our reaction conditions on a wide range of 2-aminobenzaldheydes 1 and β-n class="Chemical">nitroacrylates 2. In all cases, the products were obtained in moderate to good overall yields (37%–64%), even in the presence of a variety of functionalities (Scheme 5).
Scheme 5

One-pot reaction products.

3. Conclusions

In conclusion, we developed a new general and valuable one-pot procedure for synthesizing an important class of quinolines such as n class="Chemical">quinoline-2-carboxylates. In our approach, it was possible to prepare title compounds in good overall yields, introducing different substituent in 3-position as well as in the benzene ring. Furthermore, the mildness of our reaction conditions allowed preserving several functionalities such as ester, cyano, chlorine, fluorine and carboncarbon double bond. In addition, the use of supported BEMP enabled us to minimize the use of materials, avoiding any complex aqueous work-up, with evident advantages from a sustainable point of view. Finally, we still demonstrated the usefulness of β-nitroacrylates as a valuable precursor of heterocyclic systems.

4. Experimental Section

4.1. General Section

1H-NMR were recorded at 400 MHz on a VarianMercury Plus 400. n class="Chemical">13C-NMR were recorded at 100 MHz. IR spectra were recorded with a PerkineElmer Paragon 500 FT-IR. Mass spectra were performed on a GC/MS system by means of the EI technique (70 eV). Microanalyses were performed with a CHNS-O analyzer Model EA 1108 from Fisons Instruments.

4.2. Chemistry Section

General Procedure for the Preparation of Compounds 4 A mixture of 2-aminobenzaldheydes 1 (1 mmol) and β-n class="Chemical">nitroacrylates 2 (1.1 mmol) was stirred, under solvent-free conditions, at 70 °C for 18 h. Then, after that the temperature was diminished at 50 °C, acetonitrile (10 mL) and PS-BEMP (1.25 mmol, 0.570 mg) were added, and the resulting solution was stirred at 50 °C for further 24 h. Finally, the resin was filtered off washing with fresh EtOAc (10 mL) and the crude products 4, obtained after removal of the solvent at reduced pressure, were purified by flash chromatography column (hexane–ethyl acetate 9:1). Compound 4aa. Pale yellow oil. IR (cm−1, neat): 1063, 1160, 1458, 1619, 1727, 2959. n class="Chemical">1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 1.34 (t, 3H, J = 7.7 Hz), 1.46 (t, 3H, J = 7.3 Hz), 3.01 (q, 2H, J = 7.7 Hz), 4.53 (q, 2H, J = 7.3 Hz), 7.53–7.60 (m, 1H), 7.65–7.72 (m, 1H), 7.78 (d, 1H, J = 8.1 Hz), 8.04 (s, 1H), 8.16 (d, 1H, J = 8.5 Hz). 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ: 14.5, 15.4, 25.9, 62.2, 127.2, 128.2, 129.1, 129.5, 130.0, 135.6, 136.4, 146.0, 150.7, 167.1. GC-MS (70 eV): m/z: 229 ([M+], 29), 200 (83), 182 (14), 157 (39), 156 (99), 155 (63), 154 (100), 128 (34). Anal. Calcd. for C14H15NO2 (229.28): C, 73.34; H, 6.59; N, 6.11. Found: C, 73.39; H, 6.62; N, 6.08. Compound 4ab. Pale yellow oil. IR (cm−1, neat): 1073, 1171, 1459, 1610, 1728, 2952. n class="Chemical">1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 0.9 (t, 3H, J = 7.3 Hz), 1.34–1.41 (m, 4H), 1.47 (t, 3H, J = 7.3 Hz), 1.65–1.74 (m, 2H), 2.96–2.99 (m, 2H), 4.53 (q, 2H, J = Hz 7.3), 7.55–7.60 (m, 1H), 7.67–7.72 (m, 1H), 7.79 (d, 1H, J = 8.1 Hz), 8.04 (s, 1H), 8.175 (d, 1H J = 8.5 Hz). 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ: 14.1, 14.4, 22.6, 30.1, 31.8, 32.7, 62.1, 127.1, 128.1, 129.0, 129.4, 130, 134.3, 137.1, 146.0, 151.0, 167.1. GC-MS (70 eV): m/z: 271 ([M+], 25), 245 (68), 228 (72), 224 (44), 199 (14), 198 (96), 196 (26), 182 (35), 168 (38), 166 (29), 156 (22), 155 (20), 154 (100), 143 (72), 142 (43), 141 (15), 140 (19), 132 (14), 115 (38). Anal. Calcd. for C17H21NO2 (271.36): C, 75.25; H, 7.80; N, 5.16. Found: C, 75.29; H, 7.77; N, 5.13. Compound 4ac. Pale yellow oil. IR (cm−1, neat): 1069, 1167, 1455, 1615, 1722, 2955. n class="Chemical">1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 0.84–0.92 (m, 3H), 1.23–1.44 (m, 6H), 1.59–1.73 (m, 4H), 1.74–1.86 (m, 2H), 1.89–2.11 (m, 4H), 2.88–2.94 (m, 2H), 5.51–5.58 (m, 1H), 7.53–7.58 (m, 1H), 7.71–7.75 (m, 1H), 7.77 (d, 1H, J = 8.1 Hz), 8.02 (s, 1H), 8.17 (d, 1H, J = 8.5 Hz). 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ: 14.3, 22.8, 24.1, 29.5, 31.4, 31.9, 32.8, 32.9, 79.4, 127.2, 128.1, 128.9, 129.6, 129.8, 133.7, 137.2, 145.8, 151.5, 167.2. GC-MS (70 eV): m/z: 325 ([M+], 4), 257(14), 256 (73), 238 (14), 213 (18), 212 (100), 200 (20), 182 (17), 168 (19), 157 (16), 155 (26), 143 (55), 142 (61), 115(20). Anal. Calcd. for C21H27NO2 (325.45): C, 77.50; H, 8.36; N, 4.30. Found: C, 77.55; H, 8.39; N, 4.27. Compound 4ad. Pale yellow oil. IR (cm−1, neat): 1074, 1179, 1436, 1615, 1730, 2949. n class="Chemical">1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 1.46 (t, 3H, J = 7.3 Hz), 1.70–1.76 (m, 4H), 2.31–2.39 (m, 2H), 2.91–3.02 (m, 2H), 3.65 (s, 3H), 4.50 (q, 2H, J = 7.3 Hz), 7.57 (t, 1H, J = 7.3 Hz), 7.68 (t, 1H, J = 7.3 Hz), 7.77 (d, 1H, J = 8.1 Hz), 8.02 (s, 1H), 8.15 (d, 1H, J = 8.5 Hz). 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ: 14.5, 24.9, 30.8, 32.6, 34.0, 51.8, 62.3, 127.2, 128.3, 129.0, 129.7, 130.0, 133.8, 137.4, 146.0, 150.5, 167.0, 174.1. GC-MS (70 eV): m/z: 315([M+], 30), 286 (68), 284 (29), 270 (18), 242 (28), 236 (21), 228 (81), 182 (61), 180 (29), 170 (14), 168 (42), 167 (44), 156 (14), 155(22), 154 (100), 143 (52), 142 (22), 127 (14), 115 (27). Anal. Calcd. for C18H21NO4 (315.37): C, 68.55; H, 6.71; N, 4.44. Found: C, 68.59; H, 6.68; N, 4.47. Compound 4ae. Pale yellow oil. IR (cm−1, neat): 1027, 1236, 1456, 1659, 1716, 2245, 2933. n class="Chemical">1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 1.47 (t, 3H, J = 7.3 Hz), 1.71–1.93 (m, 4H), 2.40 (t, 2H, J = 6.8 Hz), 3.03 (t, 2H, J = 7.7 Hz), 4.53 (q, 2H, J = 7.3 Hz), 7.59 (t, 1H, J = 6.8 Hz), 7.71 (t, 1H, J = 7.3 Hz), 7.79 (d, 1H, J = 8.12 Hz), 8.04 (s, 1H), 8.17 (d, 1H J = 8.1 Hz). 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ: 14.5, 17.3, 25.4, 30.4, 32.1, 62.4, 119.7, 127.2, 128.5, 129.0, 129.9, 130.0, 133.3, 137.5, 146.2, 150.0, 166.9. GC-MS (70 eV): m/z: 282 ([M+], 9), 253 (29), 228 (34), 209 (38), 209 (38), 182 (19), 170 (23), 168 (48), 154 (73), 143 (100), 142 (18), 140 (18), 115 (33), 91 (15). Anal. Calcd. for C17H18N2O2 (282.34): C, 72.32; H, 6.43; N, 9.92. Found: C, 72.36; H, 6.47; N, 9.89. Compound 4af. Pale yellow oil. IR (cm−1, neat): 1072, 1162, 1460, 1617, 1720, 2958. n class="Chemical">1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 0.89–1.03 (m, 6H), 1.46 (d, 3H, J = 6.4 Hz), 1.66–1.79 (m, 3H), 1.80–1.93 (m, 1H), 2.93 (dt, 2H, J = 7.7, 2.1 Hz), 5.19–5.31 (m, 1H), 7.58 (t, 1H, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.71 (t, 1H, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.79 (d, 1H, J = 8.1 Hz), 8.05 (s, 1H), 8.24 (d, 1H, J = 8.1 Hz). 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ: 10.2, 14.3, 19.8, 24.8, 29.1, 35.0, 74.8, 127.5, 128.2, 129.0, 129.8, 130.3, 133.6, 137.8, 146.0, 151.6, 167.1. GC-MS (70 eV): m/z: 271 ([M+], 8), 215(20), 214 (100), 200 (20), 198 (17), 182 (14), 170 (59), 168 (63), 154 (28), 143 (93), 143 (24), 115 (21), 41 (18), 29(19). Anal. Calcd. for C17H21NO2 (271.36): C, 75.25; H, 7.80; N, 5.16. Found: C, 75.21; H, 7.77; N, 5.19. Compound 4ba. Pale yellow oil. IR (cm−1, neat): 1070, 1177, 1479, 1616, 1723, 2975. n class="Chemical">1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 1.31 (t, 3H, J = 7.3 Hz), 1.45 (t, 3H, J = 7.3 Hz), 2.99 (q, 2H, J = 7.3 Hz), 4.51 (q, 2H, J = 7.3 Hz), 7.57–7.63 (m, 1H), 7.73-7.76 (m, 1H), 7.93 (s, 1H), 8.08 (d, 1H, J = 9.0 Hz). 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ: 14.5, 15.2, 25.9, 62.4, 125.9, 129.7, 130.6, 131.6, 134.0, 135.5, 136.7, 144.3, 150.9, 166.8. GC-MS (70 eV): m/z: 263 ([M+], 26), 236 (25), 234 (71), 218 (15), 216 (16), 192 (30), 191 (54), 190 (100), 189 (59), 188 (57), 163 (19), 154 (52), 153 (14), 128 (14), 126 (18). Anal. Calcd. for C14H14ClNO2 (263.72): C, 63.76; H, 5.35; N, 5.31. Found: C, 63.80; H, 5.38; N, 5.27. Compound 4bg. Pale yellow oil. IR (cm−1, neat): 1072, 1173, 1481, 1615, 1721, 2978. n class="Chemical">1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 1.46 (t, 3H, J = 7.3 Hz), 2.64 (s, 3H), 4.52 (q, 2H, J = 7.3 Hz), 7.60 (dd, 1H, J = 9.4, 2.6 Hz), 7.20 (d, 1H, J = 2.6 Hz), 7.91 (s, 1H), 8.09 (d, 1H, J = 8.6 Hz). 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ: 14.5, 20.0, 62.3, 125.6, 129.6, 130.6, 131.3, 131.7, 134.2, 137.1, 144.4, 150.4, 166.6. GC-MS (70 eV): m/z: 249 ([M+], 9), 220 (18), 179 (31), 178 (15), 177 (100), 176 (18), 175 (18), 141 (24), 140 (40). Anal. Calcd. for C13H12ClNO2 (249.69): C, 62.53; H, 4.84; N, 5.61. Found: C, 62.50; H, 4.81; N, 5.58. Compound 4ca. Pale brown oil. IR (cm−1, neat): 1057, 1126, 1435, 1633, 1730, 2977. n class="Chemical">1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 1.36 (t, 3H, J = 7.3 Hz), 1.47 (t, 3H, J = 7.3 Hz), 3.04 (q, 2H, J = 7.3 Hz), 4.54 (q, 2H, J = 7.3 Hz), 7.74 (d, 1H, J = 8.9 Hz), 7.92 (d, 1H, J = 8.9 Hz), 8.11 (s, 1H), 8.49 (s, 1H). 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100MHz) δ: 14.4, 15.0, 25.8, 29.8, 32.9, 62.3, 121.3, 123.6, 123.7, 126.7, 127.8, 127.9, 128.0, 128.1, 128.4, 130.4, 131.0, 131.7, 136.0, 137.7, 144.9, 152.3, 166.6. GC-MS (70 eV): m/z: 297 ([M+], 21), 268 (82), 225 (36), 224 (100), 223 (66), 222 (96), 197 (21), 196 (14), 154 (31). Anal. Calcd. for C15H14F3NO2 (297.28): C, 60.61; H, 4.75; N, 4.71. Found: C, 60.57; H, 4.78; N, 4.68. Compound 4dh. Yellow oil. IR (cm−1, neat): 1052, 1119, 1431, 1606, 1638, 1728, 2971. n class="Chemical">1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 1.46 (t, 3H, J = 7.3 Hz), 2.40–2.48 (m, 2H), 2.53 (s, 3H), 3.05-3.11 (m, 2H), 4.52 (q, 2H, J = 7.3 Hz), 4.97–5.07 (m, 2H), 5.80–5.93 (m, 1H), 7.50–7.55 (m, 2H), 7.94 (s, 1H), 8.09 (d, 1H, J = 9.4 Hz). 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ: 14.5, 22.0, 32.4, 35.3, 62.3, 115.9, 126.0, 129.1, 129.5, 132.2, 133.7, 137.2, 137.6, 138.6, 144.5, 149.2, 166.9. GC-MS (70 eV): m/z: 264 (7), 235 (14), 197 (37), 193 (100), 191 (50), 177 (11), 142 (11), 30 (10). Anal. Calcd. for C17H19NO2 (269.34): C, 75.81; H, 7.11; N, 5.20. Found: C, 75.77; H, 7.08; N, 5.22. Compound 4di. Yellow oil. IR (cm−1, neat): 697, 825, 1076, 1170, 1286, 1455, 1492, 1626, 1724, 2967. n class="Chemical">1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ: 1.25 (t, 3H, J = 7.3 Hz), 2.53 (s, 3H), 2.96 (t, 2H, J = 7.3 Hz), 5.51 (s, 2H), 7.31–7.42 (m, 3H), 7.48–7.56 (m, 4H), 7.94 (s, 1H), 8.07 (d, 1H, J = 8.5 Hz). 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ: 15.4, 22.0, 25.9, 67.8, 126.0, 128.6, 128.8, 128.9, 129.3, 129.6, 132.1, 135.8, 135.9, 136.0, 138.5, 144.5, 149.2, 166.9. GC-MS (70 eV): m/z: 210 (24), 196 (18), 168 (100), 167 (75), 165 (31), 152 (19), 141 (18), 114 (14), 90 (73), 65 (28). Anal. Calcd. for C20H19NO2 (305.38): C, 78.66; H, 6.27; N, 4.59. Found: C, 78.69; H, 6.24; N, 4.62.
  13 in total

1.  Catalytic dehydrative allylation of alcohols.

Authors:  Hajime Saburi; Shinji Tanaka; Masato Kitamura
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2005-03-04       Impact factor: 15.336

2.  Conformationally constrained farnesoid X receptor (FXR) agonists: heteroaryl replacements of the naphthalene.

Authors:  Jonathan Y Bass; Justin A Caravella; Lihong Chen; Katrina L Creech; David N Deaton; Kevin P Madauss; Harry B Marr; Robert B McFadyen; Aaron B Miller; Wendy Y Mills; Frank Navas; Derek J Parks; Terrence L Smalley; Paul K Spearing; Dan Todd; Shawn P Williams; G Bruce Wisely
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Synthesis, anti-tuberculosis activity, and 3D-QSAR study of 4-(adamantan-1-yl)-2-substituted quinolines.

Authors:  Amit Nayyar; Vikramdeep Monga; Alpeshkumar Malde; Evans Coutinho; Rahul Jain
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  3-Thio-1,2,4-triazoles, novel somatostatin sst2/sst5 agonists.

Authors:  Marie-Odile Contour-Galcéra; Alban Sidhu; Pascale Plas; Pierre Roubert
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2005-08-01       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Synthesis of novel quinolone and quinoline-2-carboxylic acid (4-morpholin-4-yl-phenyl)amides: a late-stage diversification approach to potent 5HT1B antagonists.

Authors:  Carey L Horchler; John P McCauley; James E Hall; Dean H Snyder; W Craig Moore; Thomas J Hudzik; Marc J Chapdelaine
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2006-10-20       Impact factor: 3.641

6.  Efficient syntheses of the unknown quinolino[2,3-c]cinnolines; synthesis of neocryptolepines.

Authors:  Makhluf J Haddadin; Raghida M Bou Zerdan; Mark J Kurth; James C Fettinger
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 6.005

7.  Design, synthesis and in vitro evaluation on HRPE cells of ascorbic and 6-bromoascorbic acid conjugates with neuroactive molecules.

Authors:  Stefano Manfredini; Silvia Vertuani; Barbara Pavan; Federica Vitali; Martina Scaglianti; Fabrizio Bortolotti; Carla Biondi; Angelo Scatturin; Puttur Prasad; Alessandro Dalpiaz
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 3.641

8.  Iron-catalyzed oxidative tandem reactions with TEMPO oxoammonium salts: synthesis of dihydroquinazolines and quinolines.

Authors:  Renate Rohlmann; Tobias Stopka; Heinrich Richter; Olga García Mancheño
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 4.354

9.  A simple and convenient copper-catalyzed tandem synthesis of quinoline-2-carboxylates at room temperature.

Authors:  He Huang; Hualiang Jiang; Kaixian Chen; Hong Liu
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 4.354

10.  CpRuIIPF6/quinaldic acid-catalyzed chemoselective allyl ether cleavage. A simple and practical method for hydroxyl deprotection.

Authors:  Shinji Tanaka; Hajime Saburi; Yoshitaka Ishibashi; Masato Kitamura
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 6.005

View more
  2 in total

1.  Special Issue "Recent Synthetic Aspects on the Chemistry of Nitro, Nitroso and Amino Compounds".

Authors:  Alessandro Palmieri
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 4.411

2.  Highly Efficient Darzens Reactions Mediated by Phosphazene Bases under Mild Conditions.

Authors:  Carmine Lops; Paolo Pengo; Lucia Pasquato
Journal:  ChemistryOpen       Date:  2022-10       Impact factor: 2.630

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.