Literature DB >> 27314231

Parasite community similarity in Athabasca River trout-perch (Percopsis omiscomaycus) varies with local-scale land use and sediment hydrocarbons, but not distance or linear gradients.

C A Blanar1, M Hewitt2, M McMaster2, J Kirk2, Z Wang3, W Norwood2, D J Marcogliese4.   

Abstract

Parasite communities have been shown to be structured by processes at scales ranging from continental to microhabitat, but few studies have simultaneously considered spatial and environmental variables, measured at different scales, to assess their relative influences on parasite abundance, species richness, and community similarity. Parasite abundance, diversity, and community similarity in Athabasca River trout-perch (Percopsis omiscomaycus) were examined in relation to water quality, substrate profile, metal and organic compound levels in water and sediment, and landscape use patterns at different scales, as well as distance among sites and upstream-downstream position along the river. Although species richness did not differ among sites, there were significant differences in abundance of individual taxa and community structure. We observed a shift from communities dominated by larval trematodes Diplostomum spp. to domination by gill monogeneans Urocleidus baldwini, followed by a reversion further downstream. Variations in the abundance of these taxa and of overall community similarity were strongly correlated with sediment hydrocarbons (alkanes and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)) as well as landscape use within 5 km of study sites. No correlations were noted with any other predictors, indicating that parasite populations and communities in this system were likely primarily influenced by habitat level and landscape-scale filters, rather than larger-scale processes such as distance decay or river continuum effects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Component population; Environmental variables; Fish; Infracommunity; Landscape use; Parasite

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27314231     DOI: 10.1007/s00436-016-5151-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Parasitol Res        ISSN: 0932-0113            Impact factor:   2.289


  28 in total

Review 1.  Interactions between species and the structure of helminth communities.

Authors:  R Poulin
Journal:  Parasitology       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.234

2.  Tar sands need solid science.

Authors:  David Schindler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Host diversity begets parasite diversity: bird final hosts and trematodes in snail intermediate hosts.

Authors:  Ryan F Hechinger; Kevin D Lafferty
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Community structure of Diplostomum spp. (Digenea: Diplostomidae) in eyes of fish: main determinants and potential interspecific interactions.

Authors:  Hubert D Désilets; Sean A Locke; J Daniel McLaughlin; David J Marcogliese
Journal:  Int J Parasitol       Date:  2013-07-28       Impact factor: 3.981

Review 5.  Can parasites really reveal environmental impact?

Authors:  Victor M Vidal-Martínez; Daniel Pech; Bernd Sures; S Thomas Purucker; Robert Poulin
Journal:  Trends Parasitol       Date:  2009-11-26

6.  Natural and anthropogenic factors shape metazoan parasite community structure in mummichog (Fundulus heteroclitus) from two estuaries in New Brunswick, Canada.

Authors:  Christopher A Blanar; David J Marcogliese; Catherine M Couillard
Journal:  Folia Parasitol (Praha)       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.122

7.  Oil sands development contributes polycyclic aromatic compounds to the Athabasca River and its tributaries.

Authors:  Erin N Kelly; Jeffrey W Short; David W Schindler; Peter V Hodson; Mingsheng Ma; Alvin K Kwan; Barbra L Fortin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-12-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Influence of pollution on parasites of aquatic animals.

Authors:  R A Khan; J Thulin
Journal:  Adv Parasitol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.870

9.  Abiotic versus biotic hierarchies in the assembly of parasite populations.

Authors:  T K Anderson; M V K Sukhdeo
Journal:  Parasitology       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 3.234

10.  Impact of municipal effluents and hydrological regime on myxozoan parasite communities of fish.

Authors:  David J Marcogliese; Andrée D Gendron; David K Cone
Journal:  Int J Parasitol       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 3.981

View more
  6 in total

1.  Distribution of parasites of slimy sculpin Cottus cognatus Richardson, 1836 (Scorpaeniformes: Cottidae) in the Athabasca drainage, Alberta, Canada, and their relation to water quality.

Authors:  P E Braicovich; M McMaster; N E Glozier; D J Marcogliese
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 2.289

2.  The effect of water contamination and host-related factors on ectoparasite load in an insectivorous bat.

Authors:  Carmi Korine; Shai Pilosof; Amit Gross; Juan B Morales-Malacara; Boris R Krasnov
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2017-07-22       Impact factor: 2.289

Review 3.  Parasite responses to pollution: what we know and where we go in 'Environmental Parasitology'.

Authors:  Bernd Sures; Milen Nachev; Christian Selbach; David J Marcogliese
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 3.876

4.  Spatial scale and structure of complex life cycle trematode parasite communities in streams.

Authors:  Sally A Zemmer; Jillian T Detwiler; Eric R Sokol; Jeronimo G Da Silva Neto; Jennie Wyderko; Kevin Potts; Zachary J Gajewski; Lea V Sarment; E F Benfield; Lisa K Belden
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  A critical review of the ecological status of lakes and rivers from Canada's oil sands region.

Authors:  Tim J Arciszewski; Roderick R O Hazewinkel; Monique G Dubé
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 3.084

6.  Life-cycle mediated effects of urbanization on parasite communities in the estuarine fish, Fundulus heteroclitus.

Authors:  James M Alfieri; Tavis K Anderson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.