Literature DB >> 27313697

Diffusion weighted imaging for the differential diagnosis of benign vs. malignant ovarian neoplasms.

Xiang-Fu Meng1, Shi-Cai Zhu1, Shao-Juan Sun1, Ji-Cai Guo2, Xue Wang3.   

Abstract

In order to assess the diagnostic accuracy of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) in differentiating between benign and malignant ovarian neoplasms, a systemic meta-analysis was conducted. Relevant studies were retrieved from scientific literature databases, including the PubMed, Wiley, EBSCO, Ovid, Web of Science, Wanfang, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and VIP databases. Following a multi-step screening and study selection process, the relevant data was extracted for use in the present study. Statistical analyses were performed using Meta-disc software version 1.4 and STATA statistical software version 12.0. A total of 285 articles were retrieved from the database searches. Following a careful screening process, 10 case-control studies were selected for the present meta-analysis. The 10 studies investigated the efficacy of DWI in diagnosing ovarian neoplasms, and included a combined total of 1,159 subjects, of which 559 patients had malignant lesions and 600 had benign lesions. The results showed that the pooled sensitivity, pooled specificity, pooled positive likelihood ratio, pooled negative likelihood ratio, pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and area under the curve of the summary receiver operating characteristics curve of DWI for differentiating between benign and malignant ovarian neoplasms were 0.93, 0.89, 7.58, 0.10, 85.33 and 0.95, respectively. A subgroup analysis based on ethnicity revealed no significant difference between Asians and Caucasians. Another subgroup analysis by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) type showed that the DORs for GE Healthcare Life Sciences and Siemens AG machines were 100.76 [95% confidence interval (CI), 65.28-155.53] and 30.85 (95% CI, 10.40-91.53), respectively; this indicates that the diagnostic efficiency of the GE Healthcare Life Sciences MRI is superior compared with the Siemens AG MRI. The DWI demonstrated an excellent diagnostic performance in discriminating between benign and malignant ovarian neoplasms, and predicted the surgical outcome in ovarian neoplasms.

Entities:  

Keywords:  apparent diffusion coefficients; case-control studies; diffusion weighted imaging; gynecological malignancy; magnetic resonance imaging; meta-analysis; ovarian neoplasms

Year:  2016        PMID: 27313697      PMCID: PMC4888089          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2016.4445

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   2.967


  31 in total

1.  Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Julian P T Higgins; Simon G Thompson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Diffusion-weighted imaging for differentiating benign from malignant skull lesions and correlation with cell density.

Authors:  Daniel T Ginat; Rajiv Mangla; Gabrielle Yeaney; Mahlon Johnson; Sven Ekholm
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Validation and calibration of the Actical accelerometer in preschool children.

Authors:  Karin A Pfeiffer; Kerry L McIver; Marsha Dowda; Maria J C A Almeida; Russell R Pate
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.411

4.  Egg consumption is associated with increased risk of ovarian cancer: Evidence from a meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Sai-tian Zeng; Liang Guo; Shi-kai Liu; Dong-hui Wang; Jie Xi; Ping Huang; Dan-tong Liu; Jie-Fan Gao; Jing Feng; Liang Zhang
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 7.324

5.  Intensity-modulated radiotherapy of the prostate: dynamic ADC monitoring by DWI at 3.0 T.

Authors:  Georges Decker; Petra Mürtz; Jürgen Gieseke; Frank Träber; Wolfgang Block; Alois M Sprinkart; Christina Leitzen; Timo Buchstab; Christiana Lütter; Heinrich Schüller; Hans H Schild; Winfried A Willinek
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  Endometrial cancer: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient with tumor grade, depth of myometrial invasion, and presence of lymph node metastases.

Authors:  Gilda Rechichi; Stefania Galimberti; Mauro Signorelli; Cammillo Talei Franzesi; Patrizia Perego; Maria Grazia Valsecchi; Sandro Sironi
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Ovarian cancer development and metastasis.

Authors:  Ernst Lengyel
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 4.307

8.  Diagnosis of peritoneal dissemination: comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT, diffusion-weighted MRI, and contrast-enhanced MDCT.

Authors:  Yoko Satoh; Tomoaki Ichikawa; Utarou Motosugi; Kazufumi Kimura; Hironobu Sou; Katsuhiro Sano; Tsutomu Araki
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) in the oncology patient: value of breathhold DWI compared to unenhanced and gadolinium-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Russell N Low; Jonathan Gurney
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 10.  Liver lesion detection and characterization: role of diffusion-weighted imaging.

Authors:  Nicola Galea; Vito Cantisani; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.813

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance imaging of pediatric adnexal masses and mimics.

Authors:  Christopher Z Lam; Govind B Chavhan
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-08-04

Review 2.  Diagnostic accuracy of DWI in patients with ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xia Yuan; Linghong Guo; Wei Du; Fei Mo; Ming Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 3.  ESGO/ISUOG/IOTA/ESGE Consensus Statement on pre-operative diagnosis of ovarian tumors.

Authors:  Dirk Timmerman; François Planchamp; Tom Bourne; Chiara Landolfo; Andreas du Bois; Luis Chiva; David Cibula; Nicole Concin; Daniela Fischerova; Wouter Froyman; Guillermo Gallardo Madueño; Birthe Lemley; Annika Loft; Liliana Mereu; Philippe Morice; Denis Querleu; Antonia Carla Testa; Ignace Vergote; Vincent Vandecaveye; Giovanni Scambia; Christina Fotopoulou
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 3.437

Review 4.  A multidisciplinary approach remains the best strategy to improve and strengthen the management of ovarian cancer (Review).

Authors:  Luca Falzone; Giuseppa Scandurra; Valentina Lombardo; Giuseppe Gattuso; Alessandro Lavoro; Andrea Benedetto Distefano; Giuseppe Scibilia; Paolo Scollo
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 5.650

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.