| Literature DB >> 27313641 |
Shuting Jiang1, Weihao Chen1, Yimin Zhang1, Yujuan Zhang1, Ailian Chen2, Qiufu Dai1, Shujun Lin1, Hanyu Lin1.
Abstract
Purpose. To investigate whether acupuncture induced the proliferation and differentiation of endogenous neural stem cells (NSCs) in a rat model of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Methods. 104 Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into normal, model, and acupuncture groups. Each group was subdivided into three-day (3 d), seven-day (7 d), and fourteen-day (14 d) groups. The rat TBI model was established using Feeney's freefall epidural impact method. The rats in the acupuncture group were treated at acupoints (Baihui, Shuigou, Fengfu, Yamen, and bilateral Hegu). The normal and model groups did not receive acupuncture. The establishment of the rat TBI model and the therapeutic effect of acupuncture were assessed using neurobehavioral scoring and hematoxylin-eosin staining. The proliferation and differentiation of NSCs in TBI rats were analyzed using immunofluorescence microscopy. Results. The levels of nestin-expressing cells and bromodeoxyuridine/glial fibrillary acidic protein- (BrdU/GFAP-) and BrdU/S100 calcium-binding protein B-positive and BrdU/microtubule-associated protein 2- and BrdU/galactocerebrosidase-positive cells were more significantly increased at various time points in the acupuncture group than in the model group (P < 0.01), except for a decreased level of BrdU/GFAP-positive cells at 7 d and 14 d. Conclusion. Acupuncture induced the proliferation and differentiation of NSCs, thereby promoting neural repair in the TBI rats.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27313641 PMCID: PMC4897673 DOI: 10.1155/2016/2047412
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Comparison of the mNSS scores of different groups of rats with traumatic brain injury ().
| Group | Number of cases | 1 d | 3 d | 7 d | 14 d |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 32 | 1.32 ± 0.47 | 1.33 ± 0.35 | 1.19 ± 0.73 | 1.17 ± 0.76 |
| B | 36 | 8.27 ± 0.37 | 8.57 ± 0.80 | 7.56 ± 0.91 | 3.83 ± 1.30 |
| C | 36 | 8.93 ± 0.72 | 8.02 ± 1.07 | 5.42 ± 0.95 | 3.01 ± 0.54 |
Compared with group A, ∗ indicates P < 0.01 and, compared with group B, ▲ indicates P < 0.01 and △ indicates P > 0.05.
Figure 1HE staining of rat brain tissue after TBI (×200). (a) Normal. (b) Model (3 d). (c) Model (7 d). (d) Model (14 d). (e) Acupuncture (3 d). (f) Acupuncture (7 d). (g) Acupuncture (14 d).
Numbers of nestin-positive cells in the brain tissue on the injured side in different groups of rats ().
| Group | Number of cases | 3 d | 7 d | 14 d |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 9 | 8.00 ± 4.09 | 7.88 ± 3.54 | 7.11 ± 3.44 |
| B | 9 | 53.77 ± 7.12 | 43.00 ± 7.68 | 23.33 ± 4.50 |
| C | 9 | 74.11 ± 10.54 | 63.66 ± 11.83 | 41.00 ± 6.12 |
Compared with group A, ∗ indicates P < 0.01 and, compared with group B, ▲ indicates P < 0.01.
Figure 2Nestin immunofluorescence staining of cells in rat brain tissue after traumatic brain injury (×200). (a) Normal. (b) Model (3 d). (c) Model (7 d). (d) Model (14 d). (e) Acupuncture (3 d). (f) Acupuncture (7 d). (g) Acupuncture (14 d).
Numbers of BrdU/GFAP double-positive cells in the brain tissue on the injured side in different groups of rats ().
| Group | Number of cases | 3 d | 7 d | 14 d |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 9 | 5.30 ± 2.12 | 6.03 ± 2.82 | 6.18 ± 2.91 |
| B | 9 | 13.81 ± 4.74 | 15.67 ± 4.93 | 12.73 ± 4.32 |
| C | 9 | 26.77 ± 6.06 | 10.57 ± 2.98 | 7.51 ± 2.06 |
Compared with group A, ∗ indicates P < 0.01 and, compared with group B, ▲ indicates P < 0.01 and △ indicates P < 0.05.
Figure 3BrdU/GFAP double-positive cells in rat brain tissue after traumatic brain injury (×200). (a) Normal. (b) Model (3 d). (c) Model (7 d). (d) Model (14 d). (e) Acupuncture (3 d). (f) Acupuncture (7 d). (g) Acupuncture (14 d).
Numbers of BrdU/S100B double-positive cells in the brain tissue on the injured side in different groups of rats ().
| Group | Number of cases | 3 d | 7 d | 14 d |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 9 | 1.76 ± 0.83 | 1.61 ± 0.53 | 1.73 ± 0.59 |
| B | 9 | 8.37 ± 1.86 | 3.97 ± 1.93 | 2.87 ± 1.07 |
| C | 9 | 17.37 ± 7.39 | 11.5 ± 2.99 | 5.40 ± 1.76 |
Compared with group A, △ indicates P < 0.01 and ∗ indicates P < 0.05 and, compared with group B, ▲ indicates P < 0.01.
Figure 4BrdU/S100B double-positive cells in rat brain tissue after traumatic brain injury (×200). (a) Normal. (b) Model (3 d). (c) Model (7 d). (d) Model (14 d). (e) Acupuncture (3 d). (f) Acupuncture (7 d). (g) Acupuncture (14 d).
Numbers of BrdU/MAP-2 double-positive cells in the brain tissue on the injured side in different groups of rats ().
| Group | Number of cases | 3 d | 7 d | 14 d |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 9 | 4.67 ± 1.27 | 3.54 ± 1.57 | 3.10 ± 1.89 |
| B | 9 | 8.06 ± 1.91 | 10.13 ± 3.88 | 7.63 ± 2.05 |
| C | 9 | 10.20 ± 3.09 | 18.70 ± 5.04 | 16.5 ± 1.78 |
Compared with group A, ∗ indicates P < 0.01 and, compared with group B, ▲ indicates P < 0.01.
Figure 5BrdU/MAP-2 double-positive cells in rat brain tissue after traumatic brain injury (×200). (a) Normal. (b) Model (3 d). (c) Model (7 d). (d) Model (14 d). (e) Acupuncture (3 d). (f) Acupuncture (7 d). (g) Acupuncture (14 d).
Numbers of BrdU/Galc double-positive cells in the brain tissue on the injured side in different groups of rats ().
| Group | Number of cases | 3 d | 7 d | 14 d |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 9 | 0.63 ± 0.75 | 0.92 ± 0.63 | 0.50 ± 0.74 |
| B | 9 | 1.23 ± 0.97 | 1.90 ± 1.37 | 1.51 ± 0.85 |
| C | 9 | 2.32 ± 1.83 | 3.87 ± 1.66 | 3.16 ± 1.58 |
Compared with group A, ∗ indicates P < 0.01 and, compared with group B, ▲ indicates P < 0.01.
Figure 6BrdU/Galc double-positive cells in rat brain tissue after traumatic brain injury (×200). (a) Normal. (b) Model (3 d). (c) Model (7 d). (d) Model (14 d). (e) Acupuncture (3 d). (f) Acupuncture (7 d). (g) Acupuncture (14 d).