| Literature DB >> 27313538 |
Marian Y Hu1, Katharina Michael2, Cornelia M Kreiss2, Meike Stumpp3, Sam Dupont4, Yung-Che Tseng5, Magnus Lucassen2.
Abstract
CO2-driven seawater acidification has been demonstrated to enhance intestinal bicarbonate secretion rates in teleosts, leading to an increased release of CaCO3 under simulated ocean acidification scenarios. In this study, we investigated if increasing CO2 levels stimulate the intestinal acid-base regulatory machinery of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) and whether temperatures at the upper limit of thermal tolerance stimulate or counteract ion regulatory capacities. Juvenile G. morhua were acclimated for 4 weeks to three CO2 levels (550, 1200, and 2200 μatm) covering present and near-future natural variability, at optimum (10°C) and summer maximum temperature (18°C), respectively. Immunohistochemical analyses revealed the subcellular localization of ion transporters, including Na(+)/K(+)-ATPase (NKA), Na(+)/H(+)-exchanger 3 (NHE3), Na(+)/[Formula: see text] cotransporter (NBC1), pendrin-like Cl(-)/[Formula: see text] exchanger (SLC26a6), V-type H(+)-ATPase subunit a (VHA), and Cl(-) channel 3 (CLC3) in epithelial cells of the anterior intestine. At 10°C, proteins and mRNA were generally up-regulated for most transporters in the intestinal epithelium after acclimation to higher CO2 levels. This supports recent findings demonstrating increased intestinal [Formula: see text] secretion rates in response to CO2 induced seawater acidification. At 18°C, mRNA expression and protein concentrations of most ion transporters remained unchanged or were even decreased, suggesting thermal compensation. This response may be energetically favorable to retain blood [Formula: see text] levels to stabilize pHe, but may negatively affect intestinal salt and water resorption of marine teleosts in future oceans.Entities:
Keywords: bicarbonate level; hypercapnia; pH regulation; teleost; thermal compensation
Year: 2016 PMID: 27313538 PMCID: PMC4889603 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00198
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
Figure 1Localization of acid-base relevant transporters in the anterior intestine of Atlantic cod Transporters including, NBC1 (Na+/ -cotransporter1), NKA (Na+/K+-ATPase), and CLC3 (chloride channel 3) were localized in deep infoldings of basolateral membranes, whereas NHE3 (Na+/H+-exchanger 3), pendrin-like SLC26a6 (Cl−/-exchanger), VHA (V-type H+-ATPase), and CLC (chloride channel 3) were localized in apical membranes of intestine epithelial cells. Scale bar 20 μm. (B) Western blot analyses using homogenates from anterior intestine tissues demonstrate the specificity of each antibody.
Figure 2High magnification image of NKA (green) and VHA (purple) co-localization demonstrating apical localization in the brush border microvilli and sub-apical localization of the VHA. NKA is localized in basolateral and VHA in apical membranes. Note the fluorescence signal in sub-apical vesicles (indicated by arrow heads). Scale bar 20 μm.
Figure 3Determination of maximum NKA (Na. Asterisks indicate differences between temperature treatments (**p < 0.01). Values are given as mean ± SE (n = 6–8).
Figure 4Relative protein concentrations of six different acid-base relevant transporters in homogenates of anterior intestine tissues from cod acclimated to three different seawater pH and two temperature levels for 4 weeks. Protein concentrations were determined via western blot analysis and normalized to ß-actin. Different letters denote significant differences between pH treatments whereas asterisks indicate differences between temperature treatments (**p < 0.01). Correlation analyses and comparisons between linear regressions at the two acclimation temperatures are presented in Table 4. Values are given as mean ± SE (n = 5–6).
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) results of protein and mRNA concentrations of intestinal ion transporters under different .
| NKA | 2, 25 | 1.202 | 0.317 | 18°C | 8.1 vs. 7.6 | 3.770 | 0.003 | |
| T | 1, 25 | 3.248 | 0.084 | 8.1 vs. 7.8 | 2.432 | 0.045 | ||
| 2, 25 | 7.909 | 0.002 | 7.6 vs. 7.8 | 1.506 | 0.145 | |||
| NBC | 2, 29 | 1, 178 | 0.322 | 10°C | 7.6 vs. 8.1 | 3.045 | 0.015 | |
| T | 1, 29 | 23, 16 | <0.001 | 7.6 vs. 7.8 | 2.768 | 0.019 | ||
| 2, 29 | 6, 270 | 0.005 | 7.8 vs. 8.1 | 0.405 | 0.688 | |||
| VHA | 2, 30 | 5, 383 | 0.010 | 10°C | 7.6 vs. 7.8 | 3.260 | 0.008 | |
| T | 1, 30 | 6, 231 | 0.018 | 7.6 vs. 8.1 | 1.758 | 0.170 | ||
| 2, 30 | 4, 215 | 0.024 | 8.1 vs. 7.8 | 1.501 | 0.144 | |||
| 18°C | 8.1 vs. 7.8 | 2.741 | 0.030 | |||||
| 8.1 vs. 7.6 | 2.252 | 0.063 | ||||||
| 7.6 vs. 7.8 | 0.489 | 0.628 | ||||||
| SLC26A6 | 2, 28 | 3, 176 | 0.057 | |||||
| T | 1, 28 | 0.013 | 0.912 | |||||
| 2, 28 | 1, 072 | 0.356 | ||||||
| NHE3 | 2, 28 | 1, 565 | 0.227 | |||||
| T | 1, 28 | 2, 833 | 0.103 | |||||
| 2, 28 | 1, 581 | 0.224 | ||||||
| CLC3 | 2, 28 | 1, 393 | 0.265 | |||||
| T | 1, 28 | 3, 856 | 0.060 | |||||
| 2, 28 | 0.285 | 0.754 | ||||||
| CA2a | 2, 24 | 13.61 | 0.006 | 18°C | 8.1 vs. 7.8 | 9.089 | <0.001 | |
| T | 1, 24 | 9.173 | <0.001 | 8.1 vs. 7.6 | 9.079 | <0.001 | ||
| 2, 24 | 15.26 | <0.001 | 7.6 vs. 7.8 | 0.011 | 1 | |||
| CA2b | 2, 36 | 1.211 | 0.053 | |||||
| T | 1, 36 | 4.019 | 0.310 | |||||
| 2, 36 | 2.798 | 0.074 | ||||||
| CA4b | 2, 32 | 8.367 | 0.361 | |||||
| T | 1, 32 | 0.859 | 0.001 | |||||
| 2, 32 | 0.583 | 0.564 | ||||||
| CA15 | 2, 34 | 35.72 | <0.001 | 10°C | 7.6 vs. 8.1 | 14.66 | <0.001 | |
| T | 1, 34 | 44.53 | <0.001 | 7.6 vs. 7.8 | 14.45 | <0.001 | ||
| 2, 34 | 36.45 | <0.001 | 7.8 vs. 8.1 | 0.202 | 0.989 | |||
| VHAa | 2, 36 | 1.011 | 0.374 | |||||
| T | 1, 36 | 0.159 | 0.693 | |||||
| 2, 36 | 1.520 | 0.232 | ||||||
| ATP1A1 | 2, 31 | 0.939 | 0.402 | 10°C | 7.6 vs. 8.1 | 3.693 | 0.036 | |
| T | 1, 31 | 10.27 | 0.003 | 7.6 vs. 7.8 | 0.497 | 0.934 | ||
| 2, 31 | 3.597 | 0.039 | 7.8 vs. 8.1 | 3.335 | 0.063 | |||
| NHE1a | 2, 37 | 0.734 | 0.487 | |||||
| T | 1, 37 | 3.110 | 0.086 | |||||
| 2, 37 | 0.500 | 0.611 | ||||||
| NHE3 | 2, 35 | 6.267 | 0.005 | 10°C | 7.6 vs. 7.8 | 7.099 | <0.001 | |
| T | 1, 35 | 15.15 | <0.001 | 7.6 vs. 8.1 | 5.792 | <0.001 | ||
| 2, 35 | 8.039 | 0.001 | 8.1 vs. 7.8 | 0.836 | 0.826 | |||
| NBCa | 2, 35 | 7.144 | 0.003 | 10°C | 7.6 vs. 8.1 | 5.466 | 0.001 | |
| T | 1, 35 | 4.030 | 0.052 | 7.6 vs. 7.8 | 4.927 | 0.004 | ||
| 2, 35 | 3.356 | 0.046 | 7.8 vs. 8.1 | 0.745 | 0.859 | |||
| NBCb | 2, 35 | 0.297 | 0.745 | |||||
| T | 1, 35 | 4.980 | 0.032 | |||||
| 2, 35 | 0.832 | 0.444 | ||||||
| 26A3.2 | 2, 28 | 5.317 | 0.011 | 18°C | 7.8 vs. 7.6 | 5.715 | 0.001 | |
| T | 1, 28 | 1.451 | 0.238 | 7.8 vs. 8.1 | 3.325 | 0.065 | ||
| 2, 28 | 5.875 | 0.007 | 8.1 vs. 7.6 | 2.545 | 0.188 | |||
| 26A6a | 2, 31 | 6.029 | 0.006 | 10°C | 7.6 vs. 7.8 | 4.947 | 0.004 | |
| T | 1, 31 | 0.024 | 0.878 | 7.6 vs. 8.1 | 4.582 | 0.008 | ||
| 2, 31 | 3.405 | 0.046 | 8.1 vs. 7.8 | 0.574 | 0.914 | |||
| Rhbg | 2, 30 | 6.417 | 0.005 | 18°C | 7.6 vs. 8.1 | 6.080 | <0.001 | |
| T | 1, 30 | 6.736 | 0.014 | 7.6 vs. 7.8 | 6.277 | <0.001 | ||
| 2, 30 | 6.416 | 0.005 | 7.8 vs. 8.1 | 0.011 | 1 | |||
Indicates significant (p < 0.05) differences.
Regression analyses for the .
| 10°C | Protein = 0.000158*X + 0.3068 | 0.641 | 1, 13 | 23.21 | 0.0003 |
| 18°C | Protein = 0.0003419*X + 1.05 | 0.378 | 1, 14 | 8.50 | 0.0113 |
| 10°C vs. 18°C slope | 1, 27 | 16.95 | 0.0003 | ||
| 10°C | Protein = 0.0004158*X + 0.6838 | 0.2963 | 1, 15 | 6.316 | 0.0239 |
| 18°C | Protein = 0.0001224*X + 0.7476 | 0.0838 | 1, 16 | 1.464 | 0.2439 |
| 10°C vs. 18°C slope | 1, 31 | 7.959 | 0.0083 | ||
| 10°C | Protein = 0.0001245*X + 0.3591 | 0.0525 | 1, 15 | 0.924 | 0.3766 |
| 18°C | Protein = 0.0001222*X + 0.6695 | 0.0581 | 1, 15 | 0.9244 | 0.3516 |
| 10°C vs. 18°Cslope | 1, 30 | 1.748 | 0.1961 | ||
| 10°C vs. 18°C intercept | 1, 31 | 0.0167 | 0.8975 | ||
| 10°C | Protein = 0.0001972*X + 0.5609 | 0.1103 | 1, 16 | 1.983 | 0.1782 |
| 18°C | Protein = 0.0002569*X + 0.8379 | 0.2355 | 1, 16 | 4.928 | 0.0412 |
| 10°C vs. 18°Cslope | 1, 32 | 6.249 | 0.0177 | ||
| 10°C | Protein = 0.0001566*X + 0.6375 | 0.1699 | 1, 15 | 3.07 | 0.1002 |
| 18°C | Protein = 0.0000414*X + 0.376 | 0.0185 | 1, 15 | 0.2831 | 0.6025 |
| 10°C vs. 18°Cslope | 1, 30 | 0.9581 | 0.3355 | ||
| 10°C vs. 18°C intercept | 1, 31 | 2.371 | 0.1337 | ||
| 10°C | Protein = 0.0001129*X + 0.1674 | 0.0442 | 1, 15 | 0.6037 | 0.4180 |
| 18°C | Protein = 0.0002753*X + 0.2697 | 0.1351 | 1, 15 | 2.343 | 0.1467 |
| 10°C vs. 18°Cslope | 1, 30 | 0.5198 | 0.4765 | ||
| 10°C vs. 18°C intercept | 1, 31 | 4.381 | 0.0446 | ||
Indicates significant (p < 0.05) differences.
Figure 5Transcript abundance of 12 acid-base relevant transporters in the anterior intestine of Atlantic cod . Expression levels were normalized to the geometric mean of the housekeeping genes UCE2a and RPL4. Values are given as mean ± SE (n = 5–8).
Figure 6Relative transcript concentrations of 12 acid-base relevant transporters in the anterior intestine of . Expression levels were normalized to the geometric mean of the housekeeping genes UCE2a and RPL4. Different letters denote significant differences between pH treatments whereas asterisks indicate differences between temperature treatments (*p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01). Values are given as mean ± SE (n = 5–6).
Figure 7Correlation plots of mRNA and protein concentrations from intestinal acid-base transporters. Circles represent values from 10°C acclimated animals whereas triangles indicate values of fish acclimated at 18°C. Different colors indicate the different pH treatments. Linear regressions are presented as black (10°C) and gray (18°C) lines including the respective r2 and p-values (See Table 5 for slope and intercept comparison statistics).
Figure 8Intestinal model of acid-base relevant transporters in Atlantic cod . Affected transporters are indicated by a gray background and an arrow indicating up- or down regulation on the mRNA or protein (Prot) level. In animals acclimated to 10°C most transporters revealed an up regulation pattern either on the expression level, protein level or both.
Description of antibodies used for immunohistochemical localization of acid-base transporters in the cod intestine.
| Na+/K+-ATPase | NKA | Green | Raised against the avian α subunit | Chicken | Mouse |
| Na+/ | NBC1 | Red | Designed against peptide sequence EKEPFLGDKSFDK, (COOH terminal region) | Cod | Rabbit |
| Na+/H+-exchanger 3 | NHE3 | Turquois | Designed against synthetic peptide sequence TDTKQMNNDQFPPP, (COOH terminal region) | Tilapia | Rabbit |
| Na+-dependent Cl−/ | SLC26a6 | Yellow | Designed against peptide sequence RLKERSQRMNPSQIC | Zebrafish | Rabbit |
| V-type H+-ATPase | VHA | Purple | Designed against synthetic peptides corresponding to the subunit A region (SYSKYTRALDEFYDK) | Squid | Rabbit |
| Cl− channel 3 | CLC3 | Blue | Designed against synthetic peptides corresponding to residues 592-661 near the COOH terminal region | Rat | Rabbit |
Primers used for qRT-PCR.
| V-Type H+-ATPase a | VHAa | F 5′-GACAAGCACTTCCCAGAGTT-3′ | 134 | |
| R 5′-TCCAGGGTGATCTTATCCGT-3′ | ||||
| V-Type H+-ATPase b | VHAb | F 5′-GCCCTGAACAGAGACATCAA-3′ | 130 | |
| R 5′-GGAGCATCAGCTTGTGTTTG-3′ | ||||
| Na+/K+-ATPase ATP1a1 | ATP1a1 | F 5′-GTCACCATCCTCTGCATTGA-3′ | 132 | |
| R 5′-CCTCTCGTTGACCAGTTTGT-3′ | ||||
| Na+/H+-exchanger 1a | NHE1a | F 5′-CTTCGAGGAGATCCACATCAAC-3′ | 103 | |
| R 5′-CTCGTCAAACAGGTGGTACAG-3′ | ||||
| Na+/H+-exchanger 1b | NHE1b | F 5′-GCGTTCTCTTGATCGTGTTTG-3′ | 137 | |
| R 5′-GGTTCTCACGTGATCGTAGTT-3′ | ||||
| Na+/H+-exchanger 2 | NHE2 | F 5′-CTTTGCCATCTCCTCCATCAT-3′ | 145 | |
| R 5′-GAAGATGAGCGTTTCCGAGAT-3′ | ||||
| Na+/H+-exchanger 3 | NHE3 | F 5′-TGCTGGAGAAGAGCAAGATAAA-3′ | 155 | |
| R 5′-GATGAGCGAGAGATCTGAGTTG-3′ | ||||
| Anion exchanger 1a | AE1a | F 5′-CTTCTTTGCGTTCTGCAAGTC-3′ | 145 | |
| R 5′-CTTGGGTACCATCAACAGGAG-3′ | ||||
| Anion exchanger 1b | AE1b | F 5′-GGTGATGTTGGACTGTAAGGAG-3′ | 128 | |
| R 5′-GGTTGTGGATCAGAGAGTTGAG-3′ | ||||
| Na+/ | NBC1 | F 5′-CATGAAGAAGTTGCCCAGAGA-3′ | 169 | |
| R 5′-TGGGCCAAGGAGAATGAATAG-3′ | ||||
| Na+/ | NBC2 | F 5′-CACATCGACTCCCTGAAGATG-3′ | 157 | |
| R 5′-TTGGGATGAACTTGAGGATGG-3′ | ||||
| SLC26a3.1 | A3.1 | F 5′-GATTCCTTCGCCCATCTTCTT-3′ | 151 | |
| R 5′-CCATTCCATGTCTCCGTTCTT-3′ | ||||
| SLC26a3.2 | A3.2 | F 5′-GGAGGTCAATGACACGTACAA-3′ | 143 | |
| R 5′-CCCTCTTCATCTCACCAACAA-3′ | ||||
| SLC26a5 | A5 | F 5′-GAGATCATCGTGGTCATCGT-3′ | 141 | |
| R 5′-GATTCTGGGAAACAGGTGGA-3′ | ||||
| SLC26a6a | A6a | F 5′-CTACCACAAGGTATGGCCTATG-3′ | 105 | |
| R 5′-GGAGGTCCCAAAGATGAAGTAG-3′ | ||||
| SLC26a6b | A6b | F 5′-CCGTGTAGACATGTGTGTGT-3′ | 126 | |
| R 5′-CTTGGTAGCTGGGTCCTAAAG-3 | ||||
| SLC26a6c | A6c | F 5′-GACCCAGCTGCCAACTTATT-3′ | 131 | |
| R 5′-AGTACACCGTGGAAGAGGAA-3′ | ||||
| Carbonic anhydrase 2a | CA2a | F 5′-ACGGACATTCCTTCCAAGTG-3′ | 103 | |
| R 5′-TGGAAGTGGAACTGCTTGAG-3′ | ||||
| Carbonic anhydrase 2b | CA2b | F 5′-GAACGTTCTCTGAAGCCACTTA-3′ | 124 | |
| R 5′-CGGCAGTCAACGTAGAAGTATT-3′ | ||||
| Carbonic anhydrase 4a | CA4a | F 5′-GCACCAAATAGCAACACCAG-3′ | 147 | |
| R 5′-GTGTTCAAACAGGGTCCAGA-3′ | ||||
| Carbonic anhydrase 4b | CA4b | F 5′-CAGTCGCAGGTGTCATGTAA-3′ | 145 | |
| R 5′-TGTAACGGAACCAGCCTTTC-3′ | ||||
| Carbonic anhydrase 4c | CA4c | F 5′-AGTAGCTTGGACGGTGTTTC-3′ | 140 | |
| R 5′-CCAGTAGACAACTCTGCCATC-3′ | ||||
| Carbonic anhydrase 15a | CA15a | F 5′-GTGAACGTTAAGGCGATCTACA-3′ | 131 | |
| R 5′-TAGTACTTGGTACGGTCCACTC-3′ | ||||
| Carbonic anhydrase 15b | CA15b | F 5′-GCTCCGAACACATGCTGAA-3′ | 120 | |
| R 5′-TGGTCAGGGAACCCATGTA-3′ | ||||
| Ribosomal protein L4 | RPL4 | F 5′-CTCCACCATCAAGATCAACTAC-3′ | 160 | |
| R 5′-CTTCAGGTTCTTCAGAGGATTC-3′ | ||||
| Ubiquitin conjugated enzyme 2a | UCE2a | F 5′-CATATTTGGACCAGAGGGAAC-3′ | 152 | |
| R 5′-CTAAACATATGCTGCCATCGG-3′ | ||||
F, forward primer; R, reverse primer.
Results for the regression analyses and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) between correlations of .
| mRNA vs. protein | |||||
| 10°C | Protein = 0.353*X + 0.0253 | 0.856 | 1, 13 | 77.35 | <0.0001 |
| 18°C | Protein = 0.615*X + 0.0289 | 0.577 | 1, 14 | 19.13 | 0.0006 |
| 10°C vs. 18°C slope | 1, 27 | 2.45 | 0.1295 | ||
| 10°C vs. 18°C intercept | 1, 28 | 19.26 | 0.0002 | ||
| 10°C | Protein = 0.198*X + 0.693 | 0.697 | 1, 15 | 34.50 | <0.0001 |
| 18°C | Protein = 0.120*X + 0.244 | 0.351 | 1, 16 | 8.64 | 0.0096 |
| 10°C vs. 18°C slope | 1, 31 | 1.99 | 0.1684 | ||
| 10°C vs. 18°C intercept | 1, 32 | 53.19 | <0.0001 | ||
| 10°C | Protein = 0.074*X + 0.340 | 0.596 | 1, 14 | 20.63 | 0.0005 |
| 18°C | Protein = 0.165*X + 0.200 | 0.891 | 1, 15 | 122.30 | <0.0001 |
| 10°C vs. 18°Cslope | 1, 29 | 11.58 | 0.002 | ||
| 10°C | Protein = 0.176*X + 0.557 | 0.056 | 1, 16 | 0.94 | 0.3467 |
| 18°C | Protein = 0.151*X + 0.321 | 0.091 | 1, 16 | 1.60 | 0.2248 |
| 10°C vs. 18°Cslope | 1, 32 | 0.03 | 0.911 | ||
| 10°C vs. 18°C intercept | 1, 33 | 4.65 | 0.03846 | ||
| 10°C | Protein = 0.034*X + 0.360 | 0.063 | 1, 15 | 1.01 | 0.3300 |
| 18°C | Protein = 0.301*X + 0.079 | 0.730 | 1, 15 | 40.51 | <0.0001 |
| 10°C vs. 18°Cslope | 1, 30 | 8.98 | 0.0055 | ||
Indicates significant (p < 0.05) differences.