Rafael Ceña-Diez1, Pilar García-Broncano2, Francisco Javier de la Mata3, Rafael Gómez3, M Ángeles Muñoz-Fernández1. 1. Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Majadahonda, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañon, Majadahonda, Spain; Spanish HIV HGM Biobank, Majadahonda, Spain; Networking Research Center on Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine (CIBER-BBN), Majadahonda, Spain. 2. Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Majadahonda, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañon, Majadahonda, Spain; Spanish HIV HGM Biobank, Majadahonda, Spain; Networking Research Center on Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine (CIBER-BBN), Majadahonda, Spain; Laboratory of Viral Infection and Immunity, National Center of Microbiology, Health Institute of Carlos III, Majadahonda, Spain. 3. Networking Research Center on Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine (CIBER-BBN), Majadahonda, Spain; Department of Organic Chemistry and Inorganic Chemistry, University of Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.
Abstract
The development of a safe and effective microbicide to prevent the sexual transmission of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 is urgently needed. Unfortunately, the majority of microbicides, such as poly(L-lysine)-dendrimers, anionic polymers, or antiretrovirals, have proved inactive or even increased the risk of HIV infection in clinical trials, most probably due to the fact that these compounds failed to prevent semen-exposed HIV infection. We showed that G2-S16 dendrimer exerts anti-HIV-1 activity at an early stage of viral replication, blocking the gp120/CD4/CCR5 interaction and providing a barrier to infection for long periods, confirming its multifactorial and nonspecific ability. Previously, we demonstrated that topical administration of G2-S16 prevents HIV transmission in humanized BLT mice without irritation or vaginal lesions. Here, we demonstrated that G2-S16 is active against mock- and semen-exposed HIV-1 and could be a promising microbicide against HIV infection.
The development of a safe and effective microbicide to prevent the sexual transmission of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 is urgently needed. Unfortunately, the majority of microbicides, such as poly(L-lysine)-dendrimers, anionic polymers, or antiretrovirals, have proved inactive or even increased the risk of HIV infection in clinical trials, most probably due to the fact that these compounds failed to prevent semen-exposed HIV infection. We showed that G2-S16 dendrimer exerts anti-HIV-1 activity at an early stage of viral replication, blocking the gp120/CD4/CCR5 interaction and providing a barrier to infection for long periods, confirming its multifactorial and nonspecific ability. Previously, we demonstrated that topical administration of G2-S16 prevents HIV transmission in humanized BLT mice without irritation or vaginal lesions. Here, we demonstrated that G2-S16 is active against mock- and semen-exposed HIV-1 and could be a promising microbicide against HIV infection.
With no effective human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) vaccine available, considerable efforts have been made in the development of novel prevention strategies focused on the use of long-lasting and self-applied microbicides to halt the spread of HIV-1 during sexual intercourse.1 After numerous unsuccessful clinical trials on topical microbicides,2–5 the ineffectiveness of these topical microbicides turned out to be caused by the lack of adherence, by the induction of inflammation, and cytotoxic effect. Zirafi et al6 have shown that semen reduces the sensitivity of HIV to poly(L-lysine) (PLL)-dendrimer SPL7013 having 32 anionic naphthalene sulfonate groups in the periphery (VivaGel®; Starpharma, Melbourne, VIC, Australia)7,8 and to other anionic polymers acting on target HIV, and to the nucleotide or non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors or the integrase inhibitors acting on intracellular targets.2,5,9–14 These dendrimers with highly potent inhibitory effect on HIV in vitro were considered for microbicide development, but failed to prevent HIV transmission in people.6 All dendrimers were 18- to 21-fold less active against semen-treated virus and failed to prevent semen-exposed HIV infection.6 They have also shown that maraviroc, currently under consideration for microbicide development, acts equally against mock- and semen-exposed HIV.6The negative influence of semen on the efficacy of various classes of nanocom-pounds against HIV infection may explain why many microbicides that show high efficacy in vitro failed in clinical trials. We studied whether this effect can be observed in our G2-S16 anionic carbosilane dendrimer, which has been in a preclinical phase as an anti-HIV microbicide.
Materials and methods
Study design
Semen samples derived from more than ten deidentified healthy donors were collected after obtaining written informed consent from them at the Spanish HIV HGU BioBank in Madrid, Spain.15 All ejaculates were allowed to liquefy from 30 minutes to 2 hours, and the semen samples were pooled and stored in 500 µL aliquots at −20°C. Experiments were performed with rapidly defrosted aliquots and the remaining samples were ruled out. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Clinical Research, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Gregorio Marañon. TZM.bl cell line and primary peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were pretreated with serial dilutions of G2-S16 polyanionic carbosilanedendrimer infected with HIV-1 isolates that were treated with buffer or semen. Infection values were evaluated by measuring luciferase in luminescence-based assay 72 hours after infection. All experiments were carried out in triplicate and analyzed statistically.
Reagents
G2-S16 consists of second-generation carbosilaneden-drimer scaffold built from a silicon atom core, which is fully capped on the surface with 16 sulfonate groups. G2-S16 (C112H244N8Na16O48S16Si13, molecular weight: 3717.15 g/mol) was synthesized according to the previously published method (Figure 1).16 Generation is described as the number of repeating layers of silicon atoms forming the dendrimer. G2-S16 dendrimer was dissolved in distilled water and reagents in phosphate-buffered saline to a final concentration of 1 mM. Dilutions in micromolar range were formed in distilled water from the stock.
Figure 1
Structure of polyanionic carbosilane dendrimer G2-S16.
Notes: Representative scheme of the second-generation carbosilane dendrimer G2-S16. Schematic structure of carbosilane dendrimer bearing sulfonate groups at his periphery and synthesized by Michael addition.
Cell culture and virus strains
TZM.bl cell line (NIH AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program) was cultured as described.17 Blood samples were obtained from buffy coats of healthy anonymous donors from the transfusion center of Madrid following national guidelines. PBMC were isolated on a Ficoll–hypaque density gradient (Rafer S.L., Zaragoza, Spain) following the current procedures of Spanish HIV HGM BioBank.15 Prior to treatment with G2-S16, PBMC were stimulated with the mitogen phytohemagglutinin for 48 hours (2 µg/mL; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Viral stocks of CCR5-tropic R5-HIV-1NL(AD8) laboratory strain and transmitter/founder (T/F) (pCH058.c and pTHRO.c) R5-HIV-1 strains were obtained by transient transfection of pNL(AD8), pCH058.c/2960, and pTHRO.c/2626 plasmids, respectively (NIH AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program) in 293T cells (American Type Culture Collection [ATCC], Manassas, VA, USA). Viral stocks were previously clarified by centrifugation to evaluate the viral titer by using HIV-1 p24gag enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit (INNOTEST®; Innogenetics, Ghent, Belgium).
Inhibition of HIV infection in the presence or absence of semen through the action of G2-S16 dendrimer in TZM.bl cells and in primary PBMC
To evaluate the activity of G2-S16 in the presence of semen, TZM.bl and PBMC were seeded into 96-well plates at a density of 15×103 cells/200 µL and 200×103 cells/200 µL, respectively. After 24 hours, TZM.bl and activated PBMC were treated with various concentrations of tested G2-S16 for 1 hour at 37°C in the presence of 5% CO2 prior to the infection. R5-HIV-1NL(AD8) or R5-tropic T/F HIV-1 strains were incubated with semen for 5 minutes to obtain semen concentrations of 10% during virion treatment. After the semen/virus incubation, the cells were infected with 14 µL of semen–virus (20 ng virus/1×106 cells) or PBS–virus (20 ng virus/1×106 cells). The final well concentrations of semen were 0.67% and 0%, respectively. TZM.bl and PBMC were incubated for 2 and 3 hours, respectively, in culture conditions and then washed twice and replaced by 200 µL fresh medium. Three days later, PBMC supernatants were collected and 100 µL was added to TZM.bl cells, which had been seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 15×103 cells/100 µL per well the day before. Two days later, HIV-1 replication was determined in TZM.bl cells and PBMC after quantification of luciferase expression (Promega Corporation, Fitchburg, WI, USA). Fifty percent of the effective concentrations (IC50) were calculated by using CalcuSyn software (Biosoft, Cambridge, UK), based on the median effect principle.18
IC50 calculation and statistical analysis
For G2-S16 polyanionic carbosilane dendrimer, IC50 was calculated using CalcuSyn software. All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism v.6 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). Statistical analysis including the calculation of the mean, standard deviation, standard error of the mean, and P-values was performed using Mann–Whitney U nonparametric test. The significance level was set at P<0.05.
Results
To assess if semen increases the infectious capacity of HIV-1 by affecting the inhibitory potential of the G2-S16 polyan-ionic carbosilane dendrimer, we performed an inhibition assay on TZM.bl cells with three R5-HIV-1 strains in the presence of semen. It was observed that HIV-1 infection was enhanced by the presence of semen by 1 log when compared to mock-exposed HIV-1 infection in the absence of treatment (Figure 2). Out of the R5-HIV-1NL(AD8) and T/F R5 pCH058.c and pTHRO.c strains studied in the absence of semen, G2-S16 was slightly more effective against R5-HIV-1NL(AD8), showing inhibitory values over 95% from 1 µM onward (IC50 =0.04 µM). Interestingly, pTHRO.c and pCH058.c T/F R5-HIV-1 were also inhibited at nontoxic concentrations of G2-S16 (1 and 5 µM onward, respectively). The highest IC50 of 0.886 µM was obtained against pCH058.c T/F R5-HIV-1 (Figure 3; Table 1).
Figure 2
Effect of SEVI on the antiviral activity of G2-S16 polyanionic carbosilane dendrimer to block HIV-1 infection of TZM.bl cells and PBMC.
Notes: Cells were pretreated with G2-S16 at a concentration range of 0.01–20 µM. After 1 hour, the cells were infected with R5-HIV-1NL(AD8), pCH058.c, and pTHRO.c in the absence and presence of SE at a concentration of 20 ng/106 cells. RLU values were measured 72 hours after infection by quantification of luciferase expression. Data represent the mean ± SEM (n=3).
Abbreviations: HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; PBMC, peripheral blood mononuclear cells; SE, semen; SEM, standard error of mean; SEVI, semen-derived enhancer of viral infection; RLU, relative light unit.
Figure 3
Effect of SEVI on the antiviral activity of G2-S16 polyanionic carbosilane dendrimer to block HIV-1 infection of TZM.bl cells and PBMC.
Notes: Cells were pretreated with G2-S16 at a concentration range of 0.01–20 µM. After 1 hour, the cells were infected with R5-HIV-1NL(AD8), pCH058.c, and pTHRO.c in the absence and presence of SE at a concentration of 20 ng/106 cells. Infection rates were measured 72 hours after infection by quantification of luciferase expression. Data represent the mean ± SEM (n=3).
Abbreviations: HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; PBMC, peripheral blood mononuclear cells; SE, semen; SEM, standard error of mean; SEVI, semen-derived enhancer of viral infection; NT, nontreated.
Table 1
Antiviral activity of microbicides against HIV-1 and semen-exposed HIV-1 in TZM.bl cells or PBMC
Compound
Cell line
IC50
Fold IC50
IC50
Fold IC50
IC50
Fold IC50
HIV R5
HIV R5+10% SE
HIV pTHRO
HIV pTHRO +10% SE
HIV pCH058
HIV pCH058+10% SE
G2-S16
TZM.blPBMCs
0.040±0.025 µM3.345±0.413 µM
8.169±4.155 µM4.938±1.641 µM
2041
0.089±0.013 µM
11,079±0.784 µM
125
0.886±0.806 µM
1,870±0.806 µM
2
Note: Fold increase in IC50 of semen-exposed relative to nonexposed HIV-1 antiviral activity of G2-S16 against control and semen-exposed R5-HIV, pTHRO, and pCH058 in TZM.bl cells and PBMC.
Abbreviations: HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; IC50, fifty percent of the effective concentration; PBMC, peripheral blood mononuclear cells; SE, semen.
When the infectivity of HIV-1 was enhanced by the presence of semen, we observed an increase in IC50. However, G2-S16 maintained high values of protection against HIV-1 infection at higher nontoxic concentrations (15–20 µM) (Figure 3), in comparison with the concentrations obtained in the absence of semen (1–5 µM). In the presence of semen, G2-S16 showed no inhibitory activity against any of the three R5-HIV-1 strains at concentrations <1 µM. However, G2-S16 completely halted HIV-1 infection in all cases when it was used at concentrations over 15 µM. G2-S16 showed IC50 values of 8.17, 1.87, and 11.08 µM against R5-HIV-1NL(AD8), pCH058.c, and pTHRO.c R5-HIV-1, respectively, in the presence of semen (Table 1).Interestingly, G2-S16 had an IC50 lower than 0.01 µM against pTHRO.c and R5-HIV-1NL(AD8) strains in the absence of semen. G2-S16 was found to be 204-fold, 125-fold, and twofold less effective against semen-exposed R5-HIV-1NL(AD8), pCH058.c, and pTHRO.c virus, respectively (Table 1). However, inhibition values of 100% were obtained in the nontoxic concentration range of G2-S16 (Figure 3).To confirm these results in a more physiological model, we studied the inhibitory ability of G2-S16 in PBMC against a single R5-HIV-1 strain. We found that the inhibitory values of R5-HIV-1NL(AD8) in PBMC were slightly lower than those obtained in TZM.bl cells, although the tendency shown by the results was similar. Interestingly, G2-S16 inhibited 90% of R5-HIV-1NL(AD8) at 10 µM in the absence of semen and 98% at 20 µM in the presence of semen (Figure 3). The inhibition values of HIV-1 infection were practically not affected by the presence of semen when the cells were pretreated with G2-S16, resulting in minimal changes in IC50 values in the absence (IC50 =3.345 µM) or presence (IC50 =4.938) of semen. In other words, the difference was only 1.47-fold higher in the presence of semen in comparison to that in its absence (Table 1).To sum up, G2-S16 was active against mock- and semen-exposed HIV-1. G2-S16 prevented semen-treated HIV-1 infection of TZM.bl cells and PBMC at nontoxic concentrations.
Discussion
Polyanionic carbosilane dendrimers have shown promising outcomes in inhibiting HIV infection.17,19,20 Some time ago, the main limitations of the first topical “nanomicrobicide” PLL-dendrimer SPL7013 were the lack of broad anti-HIV-1 activity against R5-HIV-1 strains21 and the increased risk for HIV-1 acquisition associated with epithelial injury after 7–14 days of twice-daily administration.22 Seminal amyloid is critical for decreasing the antiviral efficacy of SPL7013 PLL-dendrimer and anionic polymers because semen lacking HIV-enhancing activity does not impair the drug efficacy, whereas synthetic semen-derived enhancer of viral infection amyloid fibrils decrease the drug efficacy as the semen itself.6 Seminal amyloids can bind to HIV virions and efficiently enhance and accelerate their attachment to target cells.6,23–26 They shorten the time of exposure of virions to microbicides acting outside the cell and can impede the accessibility of SPL7013 PLL-dendrimer and anionic polymers to the viral membrane and glycoproteins. In contrast to SPL7013 anionic dendrimer that targets HIV components, maraviroc inhibits HIV entry by binding to the cellular CCR5 coreceptor.27 Therefore, if maraviroc occupies all CCR5 receptors at the cell membrane, it can prevent viral entry independent of the presence of amyloid fibrils or semen. To sum up, compounds targeting cellular factors could be promising microbicides.We studied G2-S16 polyanionic carbosilane dendrimer because it is considered safe to be used as a topical vaginal microbicide, as shown by not only in vitro but also in vivo results.17,19,20 G2-S16 presents high biosafety and low toxicity in PBMC, shows high anti-HIV activity in urogenital epithelial cells against HIV-1-R5-, X4-, and dual-tropic viruses, their various subtypes, and T/F HIV-1 strains. G2-S16 is stable over a broad pH range (pH in vagina: 4–5.8 and pH in seminal fluid: 8–8.5), maintaining the anti-HIV-1 activity. G2-S16decreases HIV-1 infection when the cells are pretreated for a short duration. Its inhibitory effect is prolonged over time, protects monolayer for tight junction disruption induced by HIV-1, and impedes partial transmission of HIV-1 through epithelial monolayer and blocks subsequent HIV-1 infection of PBMC. G2-S16 does not induce cell proliferation or modify the expression of CD4, CD8, CCR5, and CXCR4 and does not alter markers of activation in the subsets of PBMC. G2-S16 does not alter vaginal microbiota, retains its antiviral activity for up to 2–3 hours after HIV-1 inoculation, blocks an early step in the HIV-1 infection cycle, acts nonspecifically toward Env- and CD4-expressing cells in a dose-dependent manner (although predominantly it acts toward the host CD4 cells), and is involved in HIV-1 attachment and HIV-1 entry steps on activated-PBMC. G2-S16 treatment of HIV-1 decreases the infectivity of the viral particles in a dose-dependent and tropism-independent manner, indicating that this dendrimer acts strongly on the virion, inactivating it. G2-S16 does neither alter semen motility nor affect other functions of the semen.16,19,28 No irritation or vaginal lesions were detected in rabbits after 2 weeks of intravaginal G2-S16 application19 or in CD1(ICR) mice after G2-S16 vaginal administration.19 The application of one dose of 1.5%, 3%, and 4.5% of G2-S16 to hydroxyethylcellulose (HEC) gel-treated BALB/c at various consecutive time periods does not cause disruption of the epithelial cells or produce damage in the vaginal mucosa. Topical vaginal G2-S16 microbicide administration inhibits HIV-1 infection by 85% in humanized bone marrow–liver–thymus mice without symptoms, including inflammation and vaginal irritation.29Consistent with these results and in accordance with the fact that semen is the major vector fueling the global spread of HIV infection, we carried out experiments on the inhibition of G2-S16 at maximum nontoxic concentrations (15–20 µM) in the presence of amyloid fibrils of semen against R5-HIV-1NL(AD8), T/F CH058, and THRO R5-HIV-1 strains (Figures 2 and 3). Although it is true that an increase in IC50 was found for G2-S16 against HIV-1 for which the infectivity has been enhanced by the presence of semen, it was clearly found that G2-S16 maintains its inhibitory effect on HIV-1 infection at nontoxic concentrations.The differences in results obtained between SPL7013 and G2-S16 dendrimers could be because SPL7013 is a PLL-dendrimer with 32 anionic naphthalene sulfonate groups in the periphery, and it has been shown that semen components or the alkaline pH of semen decreases the anti-HIV activity of polyanions by neutralizing their negative charge24,30–33 or by competitive binding to the viral envelope.34 These data provide conceivable explanations as to why semen abrogates the antiviral activity of polyanions. G2-S16, a polyanionic carbosilane dendrimer with 16 sulfonate groups in the periphery, not only decreases the anti-HIV-1 activity of polyanions by neutralizing their negative charge or by competitive binding (target viral G2-S16/gp120 complex) but also binds CD4 receptor in areas important for CD4/gp120 and CXCR4 or CCR5/gp120 complexes (target cell factors). G2-S16 prevents HIV entry in a manner that is independent of the number of viral particles or the presence of semen, and G2-S16 also acts as an inhibitor of cell-to-cell transmission.19,20 To summarize, G2-S16 possesses a multifactorial and nonspecific ability because it acts as a virucidal agent, an inhibitor of entry of the virus, a barrier to infection for long periods of time, and an inhibitor of cell-to-cell HIV-1 transmission.We suggest that the efficacy of microbicidal candidates for the prevention of sexual HIV transmission should also be determined in the presence of semen and T/F viruses in vitro, in order to resemble as closely as possible the physiological environment of HIV transmission and to avoid possible negative results of future treatments against HIV in clinical trials. We should not forget that the HIV is able to use the heterogeneity of its heavily glycosylated envelope gp120 to bind the most important C-type lectin receptors on the surface of epithelial dendritic cells. Also, C-type lectin receptors of epithelial dendritic cells should be researched as targets for vaginal (and perhaps anorectal) microbicides. Consistent with this hypothesis, combinations of G2-S16 dendrimer and compounds/antiretrovirals disrupting the infection-increasing activity of semen should be assessed in future studies.
Conclusion
G2-S16carbosilane dendrimer is considered safe to be used as a topical vaginal microbicide, as shown by not only in vitro but also in vivo results. We clearly demonstrated that G2-S16 dendrimer maintains its inhibitory effect at nontoxic concentrations against HIV for which the infectivity has been enhanced by the presence of amyloid fibrils of semen. This opens up the gate for future experiments, such as in vivo assays, in the presence of semen and provides encouraging prospects of achieving a topical microbicide that is able to overcome the clinical trials satisfactorily.
Authors: Salim S Abdool Karim; Barbra A Richardson; Gita Ramjee; Irving F Hoffman; Zvavahera M Chirenje; Taha Taha; Muzala Kapina; Lisa Maslankowski; Anne Coletti; Albert Profy; Thomas R Moench; Estelle Piwowar-Manning; Benoît Mâsse; Sharon L Hillier; Lydia Soto-Torres Journal: AIDS Date: 2011-04-24 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Lut Van Damme; Roshini Govinden; Florence M Mirembe; Fernand Guédou; Suniti Solomon; Marissa L Becker; B S Pradeep; A K Krishnan; Michel Alary; Bina Pande; Gita Ramjee; Jennifer Deese; Tania Crucitti; Doug Taylor Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-07-31 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Sheena McCormack; Gita Ramjee; Anatoli Kamali; Helen Rees; Angela M Crook; Mitzy Gafos; Ute Jentsch; Robert Pool; Maureen Chisembele; Saidi Kapiga; Richard Mutemwa; Andrew Vallely; Thesla Palanee; Yuki Sookrajh; Charles J Lacey; Janet Darbyshire; Heiner Grosskurth; Albert Profy; Andrew Nunn; Richard Hayes; Jonathan Weber Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-09-17 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Robert M Grant; Dean Hamer; Thomas Hope; Rowena Johnston; Joep Lange; Michael M Lederman; Judy Lieberman; Christopher J Miller; John P Moore; Donald E Mosier; Douglas D Richman; Robert T Schooley; Marty S Springer; Ronald S Veazey; Mark A Wainberg Journal: Science Date: 2008-07-25 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Shariq M Usmani; Onofrio Zirafi; Janis A Müller; Nathallie L Sandi-Monroy; Jay K Yadav; Christoph Meier; Tanja Weil; Nadia R Roan; Warner C Greene; Paul Walther; K Peter R Nilsson; Per Hammarström; Ronald Wetzel; Christopher D Pilcher; Friedrich Gagsteiger; Marcus Fändrich; Frank Kirchhoff; Jan Münch Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2014-04-01 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Ignacio Rodríguez-Izquierdo; Daniel Sepúlveda-Crespo; Jose María Lasso; Salvador Resino; Ma Ángeles Muñoz-Fernández Journal: Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol Date: 2022-01-12
Authors: Micaela A Macchione; Carlos Guerrero-Beltrán; Anabella P Rosso; Esteban M Euti; Marisa Martinelli; Miriam C Strumia; Maria Ángeles Muñoz-Fernández Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-04-05 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Rafael Ceña-Diez; Alba Martin-Moreno; F Javier de la Mata; Rafael Gómez-Ramirez; Eduardo Muñoz; Manuel Ardoy; Ma Ángeles Muñoz-Fernández Journal: Int J Nanomedicine Date: 2019-04-02
Authors: Rodriguez-Izquierdo I; Serramia Mj; Gomez R; De La Mata Fj; Bullido Mj; Muñoz-Fernández Ma Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2020-01-07 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: I Rodríguez-Izquierdo; M J Serramía; R Gómez; G Espinosa; M Genebat; M Leal; M A Muñoz-Fernandez Journal: J Nanobiotechnology Date: 2022-03-21 Impact factor: 10.435
Authors: Alba Martin-Moreno; Rafael Ceña-Diez; María Jesús Serramía; José Luis Jiménez; Rafael Gómez-Ramírez; Mariángeles Muñoz-Fernández Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2022-02-25 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Carlos Gutiérrez-Ulloa; Cornelia E Peña-González; Andrea Barrios-Gumiel; Rafael Ceña-Díez; M Jesús Serramía-Lobera; M Ángeles Muñoz-Fernández; F Javier de la Mata; Javier Sánchez-Nieves; Rafael Gómez Journal: RSC Adv Date: 2020-05-27 Impact factor: 4.036
Authors: Emilia Szymańska; Piotr Orłowski; Katarzyna Winnicka; Emilia Tomaszewska; Piotr Bąska; Grzegorz Celichowski; Jarosław Grobelny; Anna Basa; Małgorzata Krzyżowska Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2018-01-28 Impact factor: 5.923