Literature DB >> 27313004

Risk in obstetrics - Perspectives and reflections.

Andrew Bisits1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2016        PMID： 27313004     DOI： 10.1016/j.midw.2016.05.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Midwifery        ISSN： 0266-6138            Impact factor:   2.372


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  Fear, Risk, and the Responsible Choice: Risk Narratives and Lowering the Rate of Caesarean Sections in High-income Countries.

Authors:  Helga Hallgrimsdottir; Leah Shumka; Catherine Althaus; Cecilia Benoit
Journal:  AIMS Public Health       Date:  2017-12-26

2.  Birthing outside the system: the motivation behind the choice to freebirth or have a homebirth with risk factors in Australia.

Authors:  Melanie K Jackson; Virginia Schmied; Hannah G Dahlen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Women's motivations for choosing a high risk birth setting against medical advice in the Netherlands: a qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Martine Hollander; Esteriek de Miranda; Jeroen van Dillen; Irene de Graaf; Frank Vandenbussche; Lianne Holten
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Mapping the trajectories for women and their babies from births planned at home, in a birth centre or in a hospital in New South Wales, Australia, between 2000 and 2012.

Authors:  Vanessa L Scarf; Rosalie Viney; Serena Yu; Maralyn Foureur; Chris Rossiter; Hannah Dahlen; Charlene Thornton; Seong Leang Cheah; Caroline S E Homer
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-12-21       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Local guidelines for admission to UK midwifery units compared with national guidance: A national survey using the UK Midwifery Study System (UKMidSS).

Authors:  Ceri Glenister; Ethel Burns; Rachel Rowe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.