Kim M C van Mierlo1, Frank G Schaap1, Cornelis H C Dejong2, Steven W M Olde Damink3. 1. Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre & NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre & NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands; GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre & NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Institute of Liver and Digestive Health, Royal Free Hospital, University College London, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: steven.oldedamink@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
Abstract
Hepatic failure is a feared complication that accounts for up to 75% of mortality after extensive liver resection. Despite improved perioperative care, the increasing complexity and extensiveness of surgical interventions, in combination with an expanding number of resections in patients with compromised liver function, still results in an incidence of postresectional liver failure (PLF) of 1-9%. Preventive measures aim to enhance future remnant liver size and function. Numerous non-invasive techniques to assess liver function and predict remnant liver volume are being developed, along with introduction of novel surgical strategies that augment growth of the future remnant liver. Detection of PLF is often too late and treatment is primarily symptomatic. Current therapeutic research focuses on ([bio]artificial) liver function support and regenerative medicine. In this review we discuss the current state and new developments in prediction, prevention and management of PLF, in light of novel insights into the aetiology of this complex syndrome. LAY SUMMARY: Liver failure is the main cause of death after partial liver resection for cancer, and is presumably caused by an insufficient quantity and function of the liver remnant. Detection of liver failure is often too late, and current treatment focuses on relieve of symptoms. New research initiatives explore artificial support of liver function and stimulation of regrowth of the remnant liver.
Hepatic failure is a feared complication that accounts for up to 75% of mortality after extensive liver resection. Despite improved perioperative care, the increasing complexity and extensiveness of surgical interventions, in combination with an expanding number of resections in patients with compromised liver function, still results in an incidence of postresectional liver failure (PLF) of 1-9%. Preventive measures aim to enhance future remnant liver size and function. Numerous non-invasive techniques to assess liver function and predict remnant liver volume are being developed, along with introduction of novel surgical strategies that augment growth of the future remnant liver. Detection of PLF is often too late and treatment is primarily symptomatic. Current therapeutic research focuses on ([bio]artificial) liver function support and regenerative medicine. In this review we discuss the current state and new developments in prediction, prevention and management of PLF, in light of novel insights into the aetiology of this complex syndrome. LAY SUMMARY:Liver failure is the main cause of death after partial liver resection for cancer, and is presumably caused by an insufficient quantity and function of the liver remnant. Detection of liver failure is often too late, and current treatment focuses on relieve of symptoms. New research initiatives explore artificial support of liver function and stimulation of regrowth of the remnant liver.
Authors: Faouzi Saliba; Rafael Bañares; Fin Stolze Larsen; Alexander Wilmer; Albert Parés; Steffen Mitzner; Jan Stange; Valentin Fuhrmann; Stefan Gilg; Tarek Hassanein; Didier Samuel; Josep Torner; Samir Jaber Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2022-09-06 Impact factor: 41.787
Authors: Georg P Gyoeri; David Pereyra; Eva Braunwarth; Markus Ammann; Philipp Jonas; Florian Offensperger; Florian Klinglmueller; Ruth Baumgartner; Sandra Holzer; Michael Gnant; Friedrich Laengle; Stefan Staettner; Thomas Gruenberger; Patrick Starlinger Journal: Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr Date: 2019-04 Impact factor: 7.293
Authors: Amir A Rahnemai-Azar; Jordan M Cloyd; Sharon M Weber; Mary Dillhoff; Carl Schmidt; Emily R Winslow; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: J Clin Transl Hepatol Date: 2017-11-30
Authors: Klára Ščupáková; Zita Soons; Gökhan Ertaylan; Keely A Pierzchalski; Gert B Eijkel; Shane R Ellis; Jan W Greve; Ann Driessen; Joanne Verheij; Theo M De Kok; Steven W M Olde Damink; Sander S Rensen; Ron M A Heeren Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2018-04-03 Impact factor: 6.986
Authors: Bruno Christ; Uta Dahmen; Karl-Heinz Herrmann; Matthias König; Jürgen R Reichenbach; Tim Ricken; Jana Schleicher; Lars Ole Schwen; Sebastian Vlaic; Navina Waschinsky Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2017-11-14 Impact factor: 4.566