Literature DB >> 27312900

Bacterial cellulose production by Komagataeibacter hansenii using algae-based glucose.

Huma Kurtoglu Uzyol1, Melek Türker Saçan2.   

Abstract

Bacterial cellulose (BC) is a homopolymer and it is distinguished from plant-based cellulose by its unique properties such as high purity, high crystallinity, high water-holding capacity, and good biocompatibility. Microalgae are unicellular, photosynthetic microorganisms and are known to have high protein, starch, and oil content. In this study, Chlorella vulgaris was evaluated as source of glucose for the production of BC. To increase the starch content of algae the effect of nutrient starvation (nitrogen and sulfur) and light deficiency were tested in a batch assay. The starch contents (%) were 5.27 ± 0.04, 7.14 ± 0.18, 5.00 ± 0.08, and 1.35 ± 0.04 for normal cultivation, nitrogen starvation, sulfur starvation, and dark cultivation conditions, respectively. The performance of enzymatic and acidic methods was compared for the starch hydrolysis. This study demonstrated for the first time that acid hydrolysate of algal starch can be used to substitute glucose in the fermentation medium of Komagataeibacter hansenii for BC production. Glucose was used as a control for BC production. BC production yields on dry weight basis were 1.104 ± 0.002 g/L and 1.202 ± 0.005 g/L from algae-based glucose and glucose, respectively. The characterization of both BCs produced from glucose and algae-based glucose was investigated by scanning electron microscopy and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. The results have shown that the structural characteristics of algae-based BC were comparable to those of glucose-based BC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bacterial cellulose; Chlorella vulgaris; Green algae; Komagataeibacter hansenii; Starch hydrolysis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27312900     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-016-7049-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  19 in total

1.  Bacterial cellulose/TiO2 hybrid nanofibers prepared by the surface hydrolysis method with molecular precision.

Authors:  Dongping Sun; Jiazhi Yang; Xin Wang
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 7.790

Review 2.  Overview of bacterial cellulose composites: a multipurpose advanced material.

Authors:  Nasrullah Shah; Mazhar Ul-Islam; Waleed Ahmad Khattak; Joong Kon Park
Journal:  Carbohydr Polym       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 9.381

3.  Microalgae--novel highly efficient starch producers.

Authors:  Irena Brányiková; Barbora Maršálková; Jiří Doucha; Tomáš Brányik; Kateřina Bišová; Vilém Zachleder; Milada Vítová
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 4.  Functionalized bacterial cellulose derivatives and nanocomposites.

Authors:  Weili Hu; Shiyan Chen; Jingxuan Yang; Zhe Li; Huaping Wang
Journal:  Carbohydr Polym       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 9.381

5.  Simultaneous flue gas bioremediation and reduction of microalgal biomass production costs.

Authors:  I Douskova; J Doucha; K Livansky; J Machat; P Novak; D Umysova; V Zachleder; M Vitova
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 6.  Microalgae-based biorefinery--from biofuels to natural products.

Authors:  Hong-Wei Yen; I-Chen Hu; Chun-Yen Chen; Shih-Hsin Ho; Duu-Jong Lee; Jo-Shu Chang
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 9.642

Review 7.  A novel biomaterial: bacterial cellulose and its new era applications.

Authors:  Bhavna V Mohite; Satish V Patil
Journal:  Biotechnol Appl Biochem       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 2.431

8.  Characterization and optimization of carbohydrate production from an indigenous microalga Chlorella vulgaris FSP-E.

Authors:  Shih-Hsin Ho; Shu-Wen Huang; Chun-Yen Chen; Tomohisa Hasunuma; Akihiko Kondo; Jo-Shu Chang
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 9.642

9.  Evaluation of Chlorella (Chlorophyta) as Source of Fermentable Sugars via Cell Wall Enzymatic Hydrolysis.

Authors:  Marcoaurélio Almenara Rodrigues; Elba Pinto da Silva Bon
Journal:  Enzyme Res       Date:  2011-05-02

10.  Effect of addition of sodium alginate on bacterial cellulose production by Acetobacter xylinum.

Authors:  L L Zhou; D P Sun; L Y Hu; Y W Li; J Z Yang
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 4.258

View more
  6 in total

1.  Stoichiometric Analysis and Production of Bacterial Cellulose by Gluconacetobacter liquefaciens using Borassus flabellifer L. Jaggery.

Authors:  Sangavi Senthilnathan; Sameeha Syed Abdul Rahman; Saroja Pasupathi; Ponnusami Venkatachalam; Sugumaran Karuppiah
Journal:  Appl Biochem Biotechnol       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 3.094

Review 2.  Research progress of the biosynthetic strains and pathways of bacterial cellulose.

Authors:  Guohui Li; Li Wang; Yu Deng; Qufu Wei
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 4.258

3.  Consecutive bacterial cellulose production by luffa sponge enmeshed with cellulose microfibrils of Acetobacter xylinum under continuous aeration.

Authors:  Warawut Krusong; Ruttipron Pothimon; Salvatore La China; Anthony Keith Thompson
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 4.  Bioethanol Production by Enzymatic Hydrolysis from Different Lignocellulosic Sources.

Authors:  Katja Vasić; Željko Knez; Maja Leitgeb
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 4.411

5.  The Algicidal Fungus Trametes versicolor F21a Eliminating Blue Algae via Genes Encoding Degradation Enzymes and Metabolic Pathways Revealed by Transcriptomic Analysis.

Authors:  Wei Dai; Xiaolin Chen; Xuewen Wang; Zimu Xu; Xueyan Gao; Chaosheng Jiang; Ruining Deng; Guomin Han
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 6.  Nanocellulose: Recent advances and its prospects in environmental remediation.

Authors:  Katrina Pui Yee Shak; Yean Ling Pang; Shee Keat Mah
Journal:  Beilstein J Nanotechnol       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 3.649

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.