Literature DB >> 27312780

In vivo methods to evaluate a new skin protectant for loss of skin integrity.

Raha A Been1, Stéphanie F Bernatchez2, Deena M Conrad-Vlasak1, Robert A Asmus1, Bruce P Ekholm1, Patrick J Parks1.   

Abstract

A new skin protectant was developed for use on conditions involving partial-thickness skin loss such as severe incontinence-associated dermatitis. This new formulation is based on a cyanoacrylate chemistry designed to polymerize in situ and create a breathable film able to protect the skin surface from external irritants. This film provides an environment favorable for healing to occur beneath the film. To evaluate the characteristics of the novel chemistry, we devised a preclinical testing strategy comprising three different animal models. The data from all three models was considered collectively to create an overall assessment of effectiveness. A guinea pig model was used to evaluate the barrier efficacy of the new product in protecting intact skin from irritation. A porcine partial-thickness wound model was used to evaluate the efficacy of the product in helping control minor bleeding and exudate. A similar model was also used to assess the process of reepithelialization in the continued presence of an irritant. In the first model, untreated sites had 8.5 times more irritation than sites covered with the new product (p < 0.001). In the second model, a single application of the new product successfully attached to intact peri-wound skin and to denuded, weepy skin. It significantly reduced the amount of fluid weeping from the wounds (p ≤ 0.001) and continued to perform throughout a 96 hours experiment. In the third model, the percent of reepithelialization was significantly greater for the wounds covered with the new product than for the control wounds (p = 0.003; on average, 18.3% greater, with a 95% confidence interval of 9.2% to 27.5%). These results suggest that the new skin protectant protects intact and denuded skin from irritants and provides an environment favorable to healing, offering promise for the management of various conditions involving loss of epidermis.
© 2016 The Authors Wound Repair and Regeneration published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The Wound Healing Society.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27312780     DOI: 10.1111/wrr.12455

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wound Repair Regen        ISSN: 1067-1927            Impact factor:   3.617


  5 in total

1.  Rational selection of antifungal drugs to propose a new formulation strategy to control Candida biofilm formation on venous catheters.

Authors:  Paula Reginatto; Vanessa Zafanelli Bergamo; Simone Jacobus Berlitz; Irene Clemes Kulkamp Guerreiro; Saulo Fernandes de Andrade; Alexandre Meneghello Fuentefria
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 2.476

2.  Skin Protectants Made of Curable Polymers: Effect of Application on Local Skin Temperature.

Authors:  Michael J Walt; Nancy Atwood; Stéphanie F Bernatchez; Bruce P Ekholm; Robert Asmus
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Clinical Evaluation of a Skin Protectant for the Management of Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis: An Open-Label, Nonrandomized, Prospective Study.

Authors:  Mary R Brennan; Catherine T Milne; Marie Agrell-Kann; Bruce P Ekholm
Journal:  J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs       Date:  2017 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 1.741

Review 4.  Dexpanthenol in Wound Healing after Medical and Cosmetic Interventions (Postprocedure Wound Healing).

Authors:  Julian Gorski; Ehrhardt Proksch; Jens Malte Baron; Daphne Schmid; Lei Zhang
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-29

5.  Effect on Microbial Growth of a New Skin Protectant Formulation.

Authors:  Joseph Stoffel; Stéphanie F Bernatchez
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 4.730

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.