Literature DB >> 27312771

Post hoc Analysis for Detecting Individual Rare Variant Risk Associations Using Probit Regression Bayesian Variable Selection Methods in Case-Control Sequencing Studies.

Nicholas B Larson1, Shannon McDonnell1, Lisa Cannon Albright2, Craig Teerlink2, Janet Stanford3, Elaine A Ostrander4, William B Isaacs5, Jianfeng Xu6, Kathleen A Cooney7,8, Ethan Lange9, Johanna Schleutker10, John D Carpten11, Isaac Powell12, Joan Bailey-Wilson13, Olivier Cussenot14, Geraldine Cancel-Tassin14, Graham Giles15,16, Robert MacInnis15,16, Christiane Maier17, Alice S Whittemore18, Chih-Lin Hsieh19, Fredrik Wiklund20, William J Catalona21, William Foulkes22,23, Diptasri Mandal24, Rosalind Eeles25, Zsofia Kote-Jarai25, Michael J Ackerman26, Timothy M Olson26, Christopher J Klein27, Stephen N Thibodeau28, Daniel J Schaid1.   

Abstract

Rare variants (RVs) have been shown to be significant contributors to complex disease risk. By definition, these variants have very low minor allele frequencies and traditional single-marker methods for statistical analysis are underpowered for typical sequencing study sample sizes. Multimarker burden-type approaches attempt to identify aggregation of RVs across case-control status by analyzing relatively small partitions of the genome, such as genes. However, it is generally the case that the aggregative measure would be a mixture of causal and neutral variants, and these omnibus tests do not directly provide any indication of which RVs may be driving a given association. Recently, Bayesian variable selection approaches have been proposed to identify RV associations from a large set of RVs under consideration. Although these approaches have been shown to be powerful at detecting associations at the RV level, there are often computational limitations on the total quantity of RVs under consideration and compromises are necessary for large-scale application. Here, we propose a computationally efficient alternative formulation of this method using a probit regression approach specifically capable of simultaneously analyzing hundreds to thousands of RVs. We evaluate our approach to detect causal variation on simulated data and examine sensitivity and specificity in instances of high RV dimensionality as well as apply it to pathway-level RV analysis results from a prostate cancer (PC) risk case-control sequencing study. Finally, we discuss potential extensions and future directions of this work.
© 2016 WILEY PERIODICALS, INC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MCMC; Next-generation sequencing; burden testing; prostate cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27312771      PMCID: PMC5063501          DOI: 10.1002/gepi.21983

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Epidemiol        ISSN: 0741-0395            Impact factor:   2.135


  30 in total

1.  Gene selection: a Bayesian variable selection approach.

Authors:  Kyeong Eun Lee; Naijun Sha; Edward R Dougherty; Marina Vannucci; Bani K Mallick
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data.

Authors:  Aaron McKenna; Matthew Hanna; Eric Banks; Andrey Sivachenko; Kristian Cibulskis; Andrew Kernytsky; Kiran Garimella; David Altshuler; Stacey Gabriel; Mark Daly; Mark A DePristo
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Incorporating model uncertainty in detecting rare variants: the Bayesian risk index.

Authors:  Melanie A Quintana; Jonine L Berstein; Duncan C Thomas; David V Conti
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 2.135

4.  Bayesian variable selection for disease classification using gene expression data.

Authors:  Ai-Jun Yang; Xin-Yuan Song
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 5.  Statistical analysis of rare sequence variants: an overview of collapsing methods.

Authors:  Carmen Dering; Claudia Hemmelmann; Elizabeth Pugh; Andreas Ziegler
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.135

6.  From FastQ data to high confidence variant calls: the Genome Analysis Toolkit best practices pipeline.

Authors:  Geraldine A Van der Auwera; Mauricio O Carneiro; Christopher Hartl; Ryan Poplin; Guillermo Del Angel; Ami Levy-Moonshine; Tadeusz Jordan; Khalid Shakir; David Roazen; Joel Thibault; Eric Banks; Kiran V Garimella; David Altshuler; Stacey Gabriel; Mark A DePristo
Journal:  Curr Protoc Bioinformatics       Date:  2013

7.  A variational Bayes discrete mixture test for rare variant association.

Authors:  Benjamin A Logsdon; James Y Dai; Paul L Auer; Jill M Johnsen; Santhi K Ganesh; Nicholas L Smith; James G Wilson; Russell P Tracy; Leslie A Lange; Shuo Jiao; Stephen S Rich; Guillaume Lettre; Christopher S Carlson; Rebecca D Jackson; Christopher J O'Donnell; Mark M Wurfel; Deborah A Nickerson; Hua Tang; Alexander P Reiner; Charles Kooperberg
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.135

8.  A new system identification approach to identify genetic variants in sequencing studies for a binary phenotype.

Authors:  Guolian Kang; Wenjian Bi; Yanlong Zhao; Ji-Feng Zhang; Jun J Yang; Heng Xu; Mignon L Loh; Stephen P Hunger; Mary V Relling; Stanley Pounds; Cheng Cheng
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 0.444

9.  Finite adaptation and multistep moves in the metropolis-hastings algorithm for variable selection in genome-wide association analysis.

Authors:  Tomi Peltola; Pekka Marttinen; Aki Vehtari
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Lipid metabolism, apoptosis and cancer therapy.

Authors:  Chunfa Huang; Carl Freter
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-01-02       Impact factor: 5.923

View more
  2 in total

1.  gsSKAT: Rapid gene set analysis and multiple testing correction for rare-variant association studies using weighted linear kernels.

Authors:  Nicholas B Larson; Shannon McDonnell; Lisa Cannon Albright; Craig Teerlink; Janet Stanford; Elaine A Ostrander; William B Isaacs; Jianfeng Xu; Kathleen A Cooney; Ethan Lange; Johanna Schleutker; John D Carpten; Isaac Powell; Joan E Bailey-Wilson; Olivier Cussenot; Geraldine Cancel-Tassin; Graham G Giles; Robert J MacInnis; Christiane Maier; Alice S Whittemore; Chih-Lin Hsieh; Fredrik Wiklund; William J Catalona; William Foulkes; Diptasri Mandal; Rosalind Eeles; Zsofia Kote-Jarai; Michael J Ackerman; Timothy M Olson; Christopher J Klein; Stephen N Thibodeau; Daniel J Schaid
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 2.135

2.  Illustrating, Quantifying, and Correcting for Bias in Post-hoc Analysis of Gene-Based Rare Variant Tests of Association.

Authors:  Kelsey E Grinde; Jaron Arbet; Alden Green; Michael O'Connell; Alessandra Valcarcel; Jason Westra; Nathan Tintle
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 4.599

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.