Patrick Rowe1, Tim Farley1, Alexandre Peregoudov1, Gilda Piaggio2, Simone Boccard1, Sihem Landoulsi3, Olav Meirik4. 1. UNDP/UNFPA/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, Geneva, Switzerland. 2. Medical Statistics Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. 3. Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. 4. Instituto Chileno de Medicina Reproductiva (ICMER), Santiago, Chile. Electronic address: olav.meirik@gmx.com.
We wish to make the following corrections to our article in the June 2016 issue of Contraception [1].Page 498, first sentence of the Abstract should read: To compare rates of unintended pregnancy, method continuation and reasons for removal among women using the 52-mg levonorgestrel (daily release 20 microg) intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) or the copper T 380 A IUD (TCu380A).Page 500, left column, first paragraph, first sentence should read: The trial was initially planned for at least 10 years of follow-up of use of the IUDs.Page 504, right column, third paragraph, third sentence should read: The rate of discontinuation due to increased bleeding is slightly higher for the LNG-IUD than for the TCu380A in Chinese centres, while in non-Chinese centres, this pattern is reversed.