Emily Procter1, Giacomo Strapazzon2, Tomas Dal Cappello3, Benjamin Zweifel4, Andreas Würtele5, Andreas Renner3, Markus Falk6, Hermann Brugger3. 1. EURAC Institute of Mountain Emergency Medicine, Viale Druso 1, 39100 Bolzano, Italy; Department of Sport Science, University of Innsbruck, Fürstenweg 185, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria. 2. EURAC Institute of Mountain Emergency Medicine, Viale Druso 1, 39100 Bolzano, Italy. Electronic address: giacomo.strapazzon@eurac.edu. 3. EURAC Institute of Mountain Emergency Medicine, Viale Druso 1, 39100 Bolzano, Italy. 4. WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF, Flüelastrasse 11, 7260 Davos, Switzerland. 5. Austrian Board of Alpine Safety, Olympiastrasse 10, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria. 6. EURAC Institute of Mountain Emergency Medicine, Viale Druso 1, 39100 Bolzano, Italy; Inova Q Inc. , Tinkhauserstrasse 5b, 39031 Brunico, Italy.
Abstract
AIM: To calculate the first Austrian avalanche survival curve and update a Swiss survival curve to explore survival patterns in the Alps. METHODS: Avalanche accidents occurring between 2005/06 and 2012/13 in Austria and Switzerland were collected. Completely buried victims (i.e. burial of the head and chest) in open terrain with known outcome (survived or not survived) were included in the analysis. Extrication and survival curves were calculated using the Turnbull algorithm, as in previous studies. RESULTS: 633 of the 796 completely buried victims were included (Austria n=333, Switzerland n=300). Overall survival was 56% (Austria 59%; Switzerland 52%; p=0.065). Time to extrication was shorter in Austria for victims buried ≤60min (p<0.001). The survival curves were similar and showed a rapid initial drop in survival probability and a second drop to 25-28% survival probability after burial duration of ca. 35min, where an inflection point exists and the curve levels off. In a logistic regression analysis, both duration of burial and burial depth had an independent effect on survival. Victims with an air pocket were more likely to survive, especially if buried >15min. CONCLUSION: The survival curves resembled those previously published and support the idea that underlying survival patterns are reproducible. The results are in accordance with current recommendations for management of avalanche victims and serve as a reminder that expedient companion rescue within a few minutes is critical for survival. An air pocket was shown to be a positive prognostic factor for survival.
AIM: To calculate the first Austrian avalanche survival curve and update a Swiss survival curve to explore survival patterns in the Alps. METHODS:Avalanche accidents occurring between 2005/06 and 2012/13 in Austria and Switzerland were collected. Completely buried victims (i.e. burial of the head and chest) in open terrain with known outcome (survived or not survived) were included in the analysis. Extrication and survival curves were calculated using the Turnbull algorithm, as in previous studies. RESULTS: 633 of the 796 completely buried victims were included (Austria n=333, Switzerland n=300). Overall survival was 56% (Austria 59%; Switzerland 52%; p=0.065). Time to extrication was shorter in Austria for victims buried ≤60min (p<0.001). The survival curves were similar and showed a rapid initial drop in survival probability and a second drop to 25-28% survival probability after burial duration of ca. 35min, where an inflection point exists and the curve levels off. In a logistic regression analysis, both duration of burial and burial depth had an independent effect on survival. Victims with an air pocket were more likely to survive, especially if buried >15min. CONCLUSION: The survival curves resembled those previously published and support the idea that underlying survival patterns are reproducible. The results are in accordance with current recommendations for management of avalanche victims and serve as a reminder that expedient companion rescue within a few minutes is critical for survival. An air pocket was shown to be a positive prognostic factor for survival.
Authors: Kazue Oshiro; Yuichiro Tanioka; Jürg Schweizer; Ken Zafren; Hermann Brugger; Peter Paal Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-01-19 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Manuel Genswein; Darryl Macias; Scott McIntosh; Ingrid Reiweger; Audun Hetland; Peter Paal Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-04-26 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Katrin Habegger; Simon Brechbühler; Karin Vogt; Jasmin S Lienert; Bianca M Engelhardt; Martin Müller; Aristomenis K Exadaktylos; Monika Brodmann Maeder Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-08-29 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Giacomo Strapazzon; Peter Paal; Jürg Schweizer; Markus Falk; Benjamin Reuter; Kai Schenk; Hannes Gatterer; Katharina Grasegger; Tomas Dal Cappello; Sandro Malacrida; Lukas Riess; Hermann Brugger Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-12-15 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Martin Niedermeier; Hannes Gatterer; Elena Pocecco; Anika Frühauf; Martin Faulhaber; Verena Menz; Johannes Burtscher; Markus Posch; Gerhard Ruedl; Martin Burtscher Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-12-30 Impact factor: 3.390