Literature DB >> 27311638

Improving the value of clinical research through the use of Common Data Elements.

Jerry Sheehan1, Steven Hirschfeld2, Erin Foster1, Udi Ghitza3, Kerry Goetz4, Joanna Karpinski1, Lisa Lang1, Richard P Moser5, Joanne Odenkirchen6, Dianne Reeves5, Yaffa Rubinstein7, Ellen Werner8, Michael Huerta9.   

Abstract

The use of Common Data Elements can facilitate cross-study comparisons, data aggregation, and meta-analyses; simplify training and operations; improve overall efficiency; promote interoperability between different systems; and improve the quality of data collection. A Common Data Element is a combination of a precisely defined question (variable) paired with a specified set of responses to the question that is common to multiple datasets or used across different studies. Common Data Elements, especially when they conform to accepted standards, are identified by research communities from variable sets currently in use or are newly developed to address a designated data need. There are no formal international specifications governing the construction or use of Common Data Elements. Consequently, Common Data Elements tend to be made available by research communities on an empiric basis. Some limitations of Common Data Elements are that there may still be differences across studies in the interpretation and implementation of the Common Data Elements, variable validity in different populations, and inhibition by some existing research practices and the use of legacy data systems. Current National Institutes of Health efforts to support Common Data Element use are linked to the strengthening of National Institutes of Health Data Sharing policies and the investments in data repositories. Initiatives include cross-domain and domain-specific resources, construction of a Common Data Element Portal, and establishment of trans-National Institutes of Health working groups to address technical and implementation topics. The National Institutes of Health is seeking to lower the barriers to Common Data Element use through greater awareness and encourage the culture change necessary for their uptake and use. As National Institutes of Health, other agencies, professional societies, patient registries, and advocacy groups continue efforts to develop and promote the responsible use of Common Data Elements, particularly if linked to accepted data standards and terminologies, continued engagement with and feedback from the research community will remain important.
© The Author(s) 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Common Data Elements; data collection; data sharing; data standards; interoperability

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27311638      PMCID: PMC5133155          DOI: 10.1177/1740774516653238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Trials        ISSN: 1740-7745            Impact factor:   2.486


  8 in total

Review 1.  Use of central institutional review boards for multicenter clinical trials in the United States: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Devon K Check; Kevin P Weinfurt; Carrie B Dombeck; Judith M Kramer; Kathryn E Flynn
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 2.486

2.  A Federated Model of IRB Review for Multisite Studies: A Report on the National Children's Study Federated IRB Initiative.

Authors:  Julia Slutsman; Steven Hirschfeld
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec

3.  Federalist principles for healthcare data networks.

Authors:  Kenneth D Mandl; Isaac S Kohane
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 54.908

4.  Results of an ELISPOT proficiency panel conducted in 11 laboratories participating in international human immunodeficiency virus type 1 vaccine trials.

Authors:  Josephine H Cox; Guido Ferrari; Spyros A Kalams; Wlodek Lopaczynski; Neal Oden; M Patricia D'souza
Journal:  AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.205

5.  Role of clinical trials informatics in the NCI's cancer informatics infrastructure.

Authors:  J Silva; R Wittes
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  1999

6.  NIH/NCATS/GRDR® Common Data Elements: A leading force for standardized data collection.

Authors:  Yaffa R Rubinstein; Pamela McInnes
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 7.  NIDA Clinical Trials Network Common Data Elements Initiative: Advancing Big-Data Addictive-Disorders Research.

Authors:  Udi E Ghitza; Robert E Gore-Langton; Robert Lindblad; Betty Tai
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 4.157

8.  Results and harmonization guidelines from two large-scale international Elispot proficiency panels conducted by the Cancer Vaccine Consortium (CVC/SVI).

Authors:  Sylvia Janetzki; Katherine S Panageas; Leah Ben-Porat; Jean Boyer; Cedrik M Britten; Timothy M Clay; Michael Kalos; Holden T Maecker; Pedro Romero; Jianda Yuan; W Martin Kast; Axel Hoos
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2007-08-25       Impact factor: 6.968

  8 in total
  34 in total

1.  Analyzing Real-World Use of Research Common Data Elements.

Authors:  Vojtech Huser; Liz Amos
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-12-05

2.  Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM): A Guide for Authors and Reviewers.

Authors:  John Mongan; Linda Moy; Charles E Kahn
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2020-03-25

3.  Identification of Common Data Elements from Pivotal FDA Trials.

Authors:  Craig S Mayer; Nick Williams; Vojtech Huser
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2021-01-25

Review 4.  Translational Stroke Research: Vision and Opportunities.

Authors:  Francesca Bosetti; James I Koenig; Cenk Ayata; Stephen A Back; Kyra Becker; Joseph P Broderick; S Thomas Carmichael; Sunghee Cho; Marilyn J Cipolla; Dale Corbett; Roderick A Corriveau; Steven C Cramer; Adam R Ferguson; Seth P Finklestein; Byron D Ford; Karen L Furie; Thomas M Hemmen; Costantino Iadecola; Lyn B Jakeman; Scott Janis; Edward C Jauch; Karen C Johnston; Patrick M Kochanek; Harold Kohn; Eng H Lo; Patrick D Lyden; Carina Mallard; Louise D McCullough; Linda M McGavern; James F Meschia; Claudia S Moy; Miguel A Perez-Pinzon; Ipolia Ramadan; Sean I Savitz; Lee H Schwamm; Gary K Steinberg; Mary P Stenzel-Poore; Michael Tymianski; Steven Warach; Lawrence R Wechsler; John H Zhang; Walter Koroshetz
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  Unleashing the value of Common Data Elements through the CEDAR Workbench.

Authors:  Martin J O'Connor; Denise B Warzel; Marcos Martínez-Romero; Josef Hardi; Debra Willrett; Attila L Egyedi; Aras Eftekhari; John Graybeal; Mark A Musen
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2020-03-04

6.  Comparative Responsiveness of the PROMIS Pain Interference Short Forms With Legacy Pain Measures: Results From Three Randomized Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Chen X Chen; Kurt Kroenke; Timothy Stump; Jacob Kean; Erin E Krebs; Matthew J Bair; Teresa Damush; Patrick O Monahan
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 5.820

7.  Precision health: Advancing symptom and self-management science.

Authors:  Kathleen T Hickey; Suzanne Bakken; Mary W Byrne; Donald Chip E Bailey; George Demiris; Sharron L Docherty; Susan G Dorsey; Barbara J Guthrie; Margaret M Heitkemper; Cynthia S Jacelon; Teresa J Kelechi; Shirley M Moore; Nancy S Redeker; Cynthia L Renn; Barbara Resnick; Angela Starkweather; Hilaire Thompson; Teresa M Ward; Donna Jo McCloskey; Joan K Austin; Patricia A Grady
Journal:  Nurs Outlook       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 3.250

8.  Feasibility of Combining Common Data Elements Across Studies to Test a Hypothesis.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Corwin; Shirley M Moore; Andrea Plotsky; Margaret M Heitkemper; Susan G Dorsey; Drenna Waldrop-Valverde; Donald E Bailey; Sharron L Docherty; Joanne D Whitney; Carol M Musil; Cynthia M Dougherty; Donna J McCloskey; Joan K Austin; Patricia A Grady
Journal:  J Nurs Scholarsh       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 3.176

9.  The role of perceived benefits and barriers in colorectal cancer screening in intervention trials among African Americans.

Authors:  Randi M Williams; Thomas Wilkerson; Cheryl L Holt
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2018-06-01

10.  Common data elements for preclinical epilepsy research: Standards for data collection and reporting. A TASK3 report of the AES/ILAE Translational Task Force of the ILAE.

Authors:  Lauren C Harte-Hargrove; Jacqueline A French; Asla Pitkänen; Aristea S Galanopoulou; Vicky Whittemore; Helen E Scharfman
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 5.864

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.