Literature DB >> 27311620

Development and Validation of a Risk Scoring System for Severe Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding.

Tomonori Aoki1, Naoyoshi Nagata2, Takuro Shimbo3, Ryota Niikura4, Toshiyuki Sakurai1, Shiori Moriyasu1, Hidetaka Okubo1, Katsunori Sekine1, Kazuhiro Watanabe1, Chizu Yokoi1, Mikio Yanase1, Junichi Akiyama1, Masashi Mizokami5, Naomi Uemura6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: We aimed to develop and validate a risk scoring system to determine the risk of severe lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) and predict patient outcomes.
METHODS: We first performed a retrospective analysis of data from 439 patients emergently hospitalized for acute LGIB at the National Center for Global Health and Medicine in Japan, from January 2009 through December 2013. We used data on comorbidities, medication, presenting symptoms, and vital signs, and laboratory test results to develop a scoring system for severe LGIB (defined as continuous and/or recurrent bleeding). We validated the risk score in a prospective study of 161 patients with acute LGIB admitted to the same center from April 2014 through April 2015. We assessed the system's accuracy in predicting patient outcome using area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) analysis. All patients underwent colonoscopy.
RESULTS: In the first study, 29% of the patients developed severe LGIB. We devised a risk scoring system based on nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs use, no diarrhea, no abdominal tenderness, blood pressure of 100 mm Hg or lower, antiplatelet drugs use, albumin level less than 3.0 g/dL, disease scores of 2 or higher, and syncope (NOBLADS), which all were independent correlates of severe LGIB. Severe LGIB developed in 75.7% of patients with scores of 5 or higher compared with 2% of patients without any of the factors correlated with severe LGIB (P < .001). The NOBLADS score determined the severity of LGIB with an AUC value of 0.77. In the validation (second) study, severe LGIB developed in 35% of patients; the NOBLADS score predicted the severity of LGIB with an AUC value of 0.76. Higher NOBLADS scores were associated with a requirement for blood transfusion, longer hospital stay, and intervention (P < .05 for trend).
CONCLUSIONS: We developed and validated a scoring system for risk of severe LGIB based on 8 factors (NOBLADS score). The system also determined the risk for blood transfusion, longer hospital stay, and intervention. It might be used in decision making regarding intervention and management.
Copyright © 2016 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse Clinical Outcomes; Lower Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Predictive Model; Severe Bleeding; Validation Studies

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27311620     DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.05.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1542-3565            Impact factor:   11.382


  19 in total

1.  Overt gastrointestinal bleeding following haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: incidence, outcomes and predictive models.

Authors:  Xueyan Sun; Yan Su; Xiao Liu; Yuanyuan Zhang; Yun He; Wei Han; Qi Chen; Huan Chen; Yu Wang; Yifei Cheng; Fengqi Liu; Fengrong Wang; Yao Chen; Gaochao Zhang; Xiaodong Mo; Haixia Fu; Yuhong Chen; Jingzhi Wang; Xiaolu Zhu; Lanping Xu; Kaiyan Liu; Xiaojun Huang; Xiaohui Zhang
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 5.483

2.  A multicentre development and validation study of a novel lower gastrointestinal bleeding score-The Birmingham Score.

Authors:  Samuel C L Smith; Alina Bazarova; Efe Ejenavi; Maria Qurashi; Uday N Shivaji; Phil R Harvey; Emma Slaney; Michael McFarlane; Graham Baker; Mohamed Elnagar; Sarah Yuzari; Georgios Gkoutos; Subrata Ghosh; Marietta Iacucci
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Both Full Glasgow-Blatchford Score and Modified Glasgow-Blatchford Score Predict the Need for Intervention and Mortality in Patients with Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding.

Authors:  Asad Ur-Rahman; Jian Guan; Sameen Khalid; Alvina Munaf; Mohammad Sharbatji; Evgeny Idrisov; Xiaoping He; Archana Machavarapu; Khalid Abusaada
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 4.  Anorectal emergencies: WSES-AAST guidelines.

Authors:  Antonio Tarasconi; Gennaro Perrone; Justin Davies; Raul Coimbra; Ernest Moore; Francesco Azzaroli; Hariscine Abongwa; Belinda De Simone; Gaetano Gallo; Giorgio Rossi; Fikri Abu-Zidan; Vanni Agnoletti; Gianluigi de'Angelis; Nicola de'Angelis; Luca Ansaloni; Gian Luca Baiocchi; Paolo Carcoforo; Marco Ceresoli; Alain Chichom-Mefire; Salomone Di Saverio; Federica Gaiani; Mario Giuffrida; Andreas Hecker; Kenji Inaba; Michael Kelly; Andrew Kirkpatrick; Yoram Kluger; Ari Leppäniemi; Andrey Litvin; Carlos Ordoñez; Vittoria Pattonieri; Andrew Peitzman; Manos Pikoulis; Boris Sakakushev; Massimo Sartelli; Vishal Shelat; Edward Tan; Mario Testini; George Velmahos; Imtiaz Wani; Dieter Weber; Walter Biffl; Federico Coccolini; Fausto Catena
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Machine Learning to Predict Outcomes in Patients with Acute Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Dennis Shung; Michael Simonov; Mark Gentry; Benjamin Au; Loren Laine
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-05-04       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  External Validation of the Oakland Score to Assess Safe Hospital Discharge Among Adult Patients With Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding in the US.

Authors:  Kathryn Oakland; Sandeepkumar Kothiwale; Tyler Forehand; Edmund Jackson; Cliff Bucknall; Michael S L Sey; Siddharth Singh; Vipul Jairath; Jonathan Perlin
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-07-01

7.  Risk factors for severity of colonic diverticular hemorrhage.

Authors:  Ken Kinjo; Toshiyuki Matsui; Takashi Hisabe; Hiroshi Ishihara; Toshiki Kojima; Kenta Chuman; Shigeyoshi Yasukawa; Tsuyoshi Beppu; Akihiro Koga; Satoshi Ishikawa; Masahiro Kishi; Noritaka Takatsu; Fumihito Hirai; Kenshi Yao; Toshiharu Ueki; Masakazu Washio
Journal:  Intest Res       Date:  2018-07-27

8.  Impact of INR monitoring, reversal agent use, heparin bridging, and anticoagulant interruption on rebleeding and thromboembolism in acute gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Naoyoshi Nagata; Toshiyuki Sakurai; Shiori Moriyasu; Takuro Shimbo; Hidetaka Okubo; Kazuhiro Watanabe; Chizu Yokoi; Mikio Yanase; Junichi Akiyama; Naomi Uemura
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  External validation of the NOBLADS score, a risk scoring system for severe acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Tomonori Aoki; Atsuo Yamada; Naoyoshi Nagata; Ryota Niikura; Yoshihiro Hirata; Kazuhiko Koike
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Effectiveness of risk scoring systems in predicting endoscopic treatment in colonic diverticular bleeding.

Authors:  Noriaki Oguri; Takashi Ikeya; Daiki Kobayashi; Kazuki Yamamoto; Takaaki Yoshimoto; Ayaka Takasu; Takeshi Okamoto; Yasutoshi Shiratori; Shuhei Okuyama; Koichi Takagi; Kenji Nakamura; Katsuyuki Fukuda
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 4.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.