Literature DB >> 27311572

Relationship between soil nutrients and mycorrhizal associations of two Bipinnula species (Orchidaceae) from central Chile.

María Isabel Mujica1, Nicolás Saez2, Mauricio Cisternas3, Marlene Manzano2, Juan J Armesto4, Fernanda Pérez1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Mycorrhizal associations are influenced by abiotic and biotic factors, including climate, soil conditions and the identity of host plants. However, the effect of environmental conditions on orchid mycorrhizal associations remains poorly understood. The present study examined how differences in soil nutrient availability are related to the diversity and composition of mycorrhizal fungi associated with two terrestrial orchid species from central Chile.
METHODS: For 12 populations of Bipinnula fimbriata and B. plumosa, OTU (operational taxonomic unit) richness, phylogenetic diversity and community composition of mycorrhizal fungi in root samples were estimated using internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences. Then, these mycorrhizal diversity variables were related to soil nutrients and host species using generalized linear models and non-metric multidimensional scaling. KEY
RESULTS: Variation in OTU composition of mycorrhizal fungi among sites was explained mainly by orchid host species. Fungi in Tulasnellaceae and Ceratobasidiaceae were isolated from both orchid species, but the former were more frequent in B. fimbriata and the latter in B. plumosa. Soil nutrients and orchid host species had significant effects on OTU richness and phylogenetic diversity. Mycorrhizal diversity decreased in habitats with higher N in both species and increased with P availability only in B. fimbriata
CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that soil nutrient availability modulates orchid mycorrhizal associations and provide support for the hypothesis that specialization is favoured by higher soil nutrient availability. Inter-specific differences in mycorrhizal composition can arise due to a geographical pattern of distribution of orchid mycorrhizal fungi, host preferences for fungal partners or differential performance of mycorrhizal fungi under different nutrient availabilities. Further experiments are needed to evaluate these hypotheses.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bipinnula; central Chile; mycorrhizal specialization; orchid mycorrhiza; soil nutrients

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27311572      PMCID: PMC4934401          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcw082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  30 in total

1.  Direct and indirect influences of 8 yr of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization on Glomeromycota in an alpine meadow ecosystem.

Authors:  Yongjun Liu; Guoxi Shi; Lin Mao; Gang Cheng; Shengjing Jiang; Xiaojun Ma; Lizhe An; Guozhen Du; Nancy Collins Johnson; Huyuan Feng
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 10.151

2.  Internal transcribed spacer primers and sequences for improved characterization of basidiomycetous orchid mycorrhizas.

Authors:  D Lee Taylor; Melissa K McCormick
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2007-12-08       Impact factor: 10.151

3.  Mycorrhizal fungi of Vanilla: diversity, specificity and effects on seed germination and plant growth.

Authors:  Andrea Porras-Alfaro; Paul Bayman
Journal:  Mycologia       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.696

4.  Towards global patterns in the diversity and community structure of ectomycorrhizal fungi.

Authors:  Leho Tedersoo; Mohammad Bahram; Märt Toots; Abdala G Diédhiou; Terry W Henkel; Rasmus Kjøller; Melissa H Morris; Kazuhide Nara; Eduardo Nouhra; Kabir G Peay; Sergei Põlme; Martin Ryberg; Matthew E Smith; Urmas Kõljalg
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 6.185

5.  jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging.

Authors:  David Posada
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Reciprocal rewards stabilize cooperation in the mycorrhizal symbiosis.

Authors:  E Toby Kiers; Marie Duhamel; Yugandhar Beesetty; Jerry A Mensah; Oscar Franken; Erik Verbruggen; Carl R Fellbaum; George A Kowalchuk; Miranda M Hart; Alberto Bago; Todd M Palmer; Stuart A West; Philippe Vandenkoornhuyse; Jan Jansa; Heike Bücking
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Biogeography of ectomycorrhizal fungi associated with alders (Alnus spp.) in relation to biotic and abiotic variables at the global scale.

Authors:  Sergei Põlme; Mohammad Bahram; Takashi Yamanaka; Kazuhide Nara; Yu Cheng Dai; Tine Grebenc; Hojka Kraigher; Mika Toivonen; Pi-Han Wang; Yosuke Matsuda; Triin Naadel; Peter G Kennedy; Urmas Kõljalg; Leho Tedersoo
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 10.151

8.  Ecological specialization in mycorrhizal symbiosis leads to rarity in an endangered orchid.

Authors:  Nigel D Swarts; Elizabeth A Sinclair; Anthony Francis; Kingsley W Dixon
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 9.  A conceptual framework for the evolution of ecological specialisation.

Authors:  Timothée Poisot; James D Bever; Adnane Nemri; Peter H Thrall; Michael E Hochberg
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 9.492

10.  Neonectria liriodendri sp. nov., the main causal agent of black foot disease of grapevines.

Authors:  Francois Halleen; Hans-Josef Schroers; Johannes Z Groenewald; Cecília Rego; Helena Oliveira; Pedro W Crous
Journal:  Stud Mycol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 16.097

View more
  9 in total

1.  Orchid conservation: further links.

Authors:  Michael F Fay
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Host population size is linked to orchid mycorrhizal fungal communities in roots and soil, which are shaped by microenvironment.

Authors:  Jaspreet Kaur; Caleb Phillips; Jyotsna Sharma
Journal:  Mycorrhiza       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 3.387

3.  Fungal symbionts may modulate nitrate inhibitory effect on orchid seed germination.

Authors:  Tomáš Figura; Edita Tylová; Jana Jersáková; Martin Vohník; Jan Ponert
Journal:  Mycorrhiza       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 3.387

4.  Inorganic phosphorus nutrition in green-leaved terrestrial orchid seedlings.

Authors:  Belinda Davis; Wei-Han Lim; Hans Lambers; Kingsley W Dixon; David J Read
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 5.040

5.  Matching symbiotic associations of an endangered orchid to habitat to improve conservation outcomes.

Authors:  Noushka Reiter; Ann C Lawrie; Celeste C Linde
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 4.357

6.  In situ Orchid Seedling-Trap Experiment Shows Few Keystone and Many Randomly Associated Mycorrhizal Fungal Species During Early Plant Colonization.

Authors:  Stefania Cevallos; Stéphane Declerck; Juan Pablo Suárez
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 5.753

7.  Mycorrhizal Fungi Isolated from Native Terrestrial Orchids from Region of La Araucanía, Southern Chile.

Authors:  Hector Herrera; Tedy Sanhueza; Rodolfo Martiarena; Rafael Valadares; Alejandra Fuentes; Cesar Arriagada
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-07-25

8.  Soil Microbial Communities Affect the Growth and Secondary Metabolite Accumulation in Bletilla striata (Thunb.) Rchb. f.

Authors:  Chenghong Xiao; Chunyun Xu; Jinqiang Zhang; Weike Jiang; Xinqing Zhang; Changgui Yang; Jiao Xu; Yongping Zhang; Tao Zhou
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 6.064

9.  Diversity of Root-Associated Fungi of the Terrestrial Orchids Gavilea lutea and Chloraea collicensis in a Temperate Forest Soil of South-Central Chile.

Authors:  Héctor Herrera; Tedy Sanhueza; Rafael Borges da Silva Valadares; Francisco Matus; Guillermo Pereira; Cristian Atala; María de la Luz Mora; Cesar Arriagada
Journal:  J Fungi (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-29
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.