Khaled Al Rashah1, Nicola Pritchard, Cirous Dehghani, Alfredo Ruggeri, Pedro Guimaraes, Christopher Poole, Anthony Russell, Rayaz Malik, Nathan Efron, Katie Edwards. 1. *Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Queensland, Australia; †Department of Information Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, Italy; ‡Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; §School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; ¶Center for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Institute of Human Development, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; and ‖Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Doha, Qatar.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess the repeatability of measuring the corneal nerve migration rate in individuals with and without neuropathy. METHODS: Wide-field montages of the subbasal corneal nerve plexus were generated at baseline and after 3 weeks for 14 participants. Montages were manually examined side by side to identify a referent landmark in the inferior whorl region (origin) and throughout each montage. A software program was developed to measure nerve migration of all identified points relative to the origin. Repeatability was determined by measurement of nerve migration for within observer (one researcher on 2 occasions, 5 days apart) and between observers (2 observers) within 4 different zones based on the distance from the origin and in the vertical section of the wide-field montage. The impact of images being montaged with fully automated software on repeatability was also investigated. RESULTS: The mean difference between observations 1 and 2 for observer 1 was 0.02 ± 1.3 μm/wk (P = 0.94), with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.99 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.99-1.00], and the mean difference between observer 1 and 2 was 0.3 ± 1.2 μm/wk (P = 0.41), with an ICC of 0.99 (95% CI = 0.99-1.00). The mean difference between observations 1 (images montaged by semiautomated software) and 2 (images montaged by fully automated software) was 1.2 ± 4.9 μm/wk (P = 0.41), with an ICC of 0.96 (95% CI = 0.87-1.00). CONCLUSIONS: Measuring corneal nerve migration rate is highly repeatable for within and between observers and when using different methods of image montaging.
PURPOSE: To assess the repeatability of measuring the corneal nerve migration rate in individuals with and without neuropathy. METHODS: Wide-field montages of the subbasal corneal nerve plexus were generated at baseline and after 3 weeks for 14 participants. Montages were manually examined side by side to identify a referent landmark in the inferior whorl region (origin) and throughout each montage. A software program was developed to measure nerve migration of all identified points relative to the origin. Repeatability was determined by measurement of nerve migration for within observer (one researcher on 2 occasions, 5 days apart) and between observers (2 observers) within 4 different zones based on the distance from the origin and in the vertical section of the wide-field montage. The impact of images being montaged with fully automated software on repeatability was also investigated. RESULTS: The mean difference between observations 1 and 2 for observer 1 was 0.02 ± 1.3 μm/wk (P = 0.94), with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.99 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.99-1.00], and the mean difference between observer 1 and 2 was 0.3 ± 1.2 μm/wk (P = 0.41), with an ICC of 0.99 (95% CI = 0.99-1.00). The mean difference between observations 1 (images montaged by semiautomated software) and 2 (images montaged by fully automated software) was 1.2 ± 4.9 μm/wk (P = 0.41), with an ICC of 0.96 (95% CI = 0.87-1.00). CONCLUSIONS: Measuring corneal nerve migration rate is highly repeatable for within and between observers and when using different methods of image montaging.
Authors: Nadine Stache; Katharina A Sterenczak; Karsten Sperlich; Carl F Marfurt; Stephan Allgeier; Bernd Köhler; Ralf Mikut; Andreas Bartschat; Klaus-Martin Reichert; Rudolf F Guthoff; Angrit Stachs; Oliver Stachs; Sebastian Bohn Journal: Quant Imaging Med Surg Date: 2022-10