Literature DB >> 27310432

Patient-reported outcome measurement in drug discovery: a tool to improve accuracy and completeness of efficacy and safety data.

Ethan Basch1, Amylou C Dueck2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) reflect how patients feel and function as conveyed directly by patients themselves, for example symptoms and physical functioning. PRO measures can be included in any phase of product development as primary, secondary, or exploratory endpoints to understand the impact of treatment on the patient experience. AREAS COVERED: In this review, the authors describe approaches commonly used to assess PROs in drug development programs, including how to select or develop outcomes and measures, implement these in trials, and analyze data. Barriers and facilitators for effectively including PROs in clinical trials are discussed, and strategies for making labeling claims based on PRO data are noted. EXPERT OPINION: Early planning with PRO experts is recommended to assure a successful PRO strategy in a product development program. Outcomes that are meaningful to patients should be rationally identified early in a product development program based on qualitative work, literature search and/or assumed mechanism of action. Measures corresponding to those outcomes should be selected or developed, with demonstration of robust psychometric properties in a related patient population. Ideally, these measures will be tested prior to a pivotal trial to support the design and analysis in the pivotal trial. Selection of timing and mode of assessments should be specified a priori and justified. If a labeling claim is sought, a statistical plan should be pre-specified. Strategies to minimize and handle missing data in analyses should be planned up front.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endpoint; patient-reported outcome; physical function; symptom

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27310432     DOI: 10.1080/17460441.2016.1193148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Discov        ISSN: 1746-0441            Impact factor:   6.098


  6 in total

1.  Factors affecting symptom presentation in an early-phase clinical trials clinic patient population.

Authors:  Goldy C George; Tito R Mendoza; Eucharia C Iwuanyanwu; Meryna Manandhar; Solmaz F Afshar; Sarina A Piha-Paul; Apostolia Tsimberidou; Aung Naing; Charles S Cleeland; David S Hong
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 3.850

2.  Patient free text reporting of symptomatic adverse events in cancer clinical research using the National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE).

Authors:  Arlene E Chung; Kimberly Shoenbill; Sandra A Mitchell; Amylou C Dueck; Deborah Schrag; Deborah W Bruner; Lori M Minasian; Diane St Germain; Ann M O'Mara; Paul Baumgartner; Lauren J Rogak; Amy P Abernethy; Ashley C Griffin; Ethan M Basch
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Feasibility of Implementing the Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events in a Multicenter Trial: NCCTG N1048.

Authors:  Ethan Basch; Amylou C Dueck; Lauren J Rogak; Sandra A Mitchell; Lori M Minasian; Andrea M Denicoff; Jennifer K Wind; Mary C Shaw; Narre Heon; Qian Shi; Brenda Ginos; Garth D Nelson; Jeffrey P Meyers; George J Chang; Harvey J Mamon; Martin R Weiser; Tatjana Kolevska; Bryce B Reeve; Deborah Watkins Bruner; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Composite grading algorithm for the National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE).

Authors:  Ethan Basch; Claus Becker; Lauren J Rogak; Deborah Schrag; Bryce B Reeve; Patricia Spears; Mary Lou Smith; Mrinal M Gounder; Michelle R Mahoney; Gary K Schwartz; Antonia V Bennett; Tito R Mendoza; Charles S Cleeland; Jeff A Sloan; Deborah Watkins Bruner; Gisela Schwab; Thomas M Atkinson; Gita Thanarajasingam; Monica M Bertagnolli; Amylou C Dueck
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 2.486

5.  Update on the psychometric properties and minimal important difference (MID) thresholds of the FACT-M questionnaire for use in treatment-naïve and previously treated patients with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Murtuza Bharmal; Sandra Nolte; Mickaël Henry-Szatkowski; Meliessa Hennessy; Michael Schlichting
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 3.186

6.  Effect of Collaborative Review of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes for Shared Reporting in Breast Cancer Patients: Descriptive Comparative Study.

Authors:  Andreas Trojan; Basil Bättig; Meinrad Mannhart; Burkhardt Seifert; Mathis N Brauchbar; Marco Egbring
Journal:  JMIR Cancer       Date:  2021-03-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.