Literature DB >> 27309289

Case Series of Turkey Farms from the H5N2 Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Outbreak in the United States During 2015.

David Dargatz1, Andrea Beam2, Sherri Wainwright1, Brian McCluskey1.   

Abstract

Between December 2014 and June 2015, an outbreak of H5N2 HPAI caused the largest and most expensive agriculture emergency in U.S. Department of Agriculture-Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service history. The outbreak affected 21 states; 232 poultry farms (211 commercial and 21 backyard) were affected, and approximately 49.6 million birds were depopulated on poultry farms. The majority of affected farms were commercial turkey operations (n = 160). This report is a case series describing 104 H5N2 HPAI-affected turkey farms in Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wisconsin that had H5N2 HPAI virus detected between March 5 and June 1, 2015. The farm manager or farm personnel voluntarily completed an epidemiologic questionnaire administered by state and federal animal health officials. Equipment and vehicle sharing with other farms was common, particularly for feed trucks (77% of farms shared feed trucks with other farms), live haul loaders (90.4%), poult trailers (72.0%), and preloaders (80.7%). Many farms had water bodies in proximity to the farm, such as a pond (42.6%) or stream (21.8%). About one-third of farms (33.7%) reported seeing wild birds inside the turkey barns. Only 44.2% of farms reported that third-party biosecurity audits or assessments had been conducted. Because the newly introduced Asian H5N8 HPAI and two new HPAI viruses, H5N2 and H5N1, are now circulating in U.S. wild birds, primarily migratory waterfowl, a greater potential for reoccurrence exists with the spring and fall migratory seasons, representing higher risk periods for outbreaks of HPAI in commercial poultry farms in the future. Eliminating exposure to wild birds, especially waterfowl or environments contaminated by wild waterfowl, will reduce risk of reintroduction of H5N2 HPAI virus, and ensuring good on-farm biosecurity will help the poultry industry avoid introduction of influenza and lateral spread between farms.

Entities:  

Keywords:  H5N2; United States; epidemiology; highly pathogenic avian influenza; outbreak

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27309289     DOI: 10.1637/11350-121715-Reg

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Avian Dis        ISSN: 0005-2086            Impact factor:   1.577


  9 in total

1.  Numerical Simulation of Airborne Disease Spread in Cage-Free Hen Housing with Multiple Ventilation Options.

Authors:  Long Chen; Eileen E Fabian-Wheeler; John M Cimbala; Daniel Hofstetter; Paul Patterson
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 3.231

2.  Short- and long-term protective efficacy against clade 2.3.4.4 H5N2 highly pathogenic avian influenza virus following prime-boost vaccination in turkeys.

Authors:  Jefferson J S Santos; Adebimpe O Obadan; Stivalis Cardenas Garcia; Silvia Carnaccini; Darrell R Kapczynski; Mary Pantin-Jackwood; David L Suarez; Daniel R Perez
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 3.641

3.  Surveillance for highly pathogenic H5 avian influenza virus in synanthropic wildlife associated with poultry farms during an acute outbreak.

Authors:  Susan A Shriner; J Jeffrey Root; Mark W Lutman; Jason M Kloft; Kaci K VanDalen; Heather J Sullivan; Timothy S White; Michael P Milleson; Jerry L Hairston; Shannon C Chandler; Paul C Wolf; Clinton T Turnage; Brian J McCluskey; Amy L Vincent; Mia K Torchetti; Thomas Gidlewski; Thomas J DeLiberto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  The pathogenesis of H7N8 low and highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses from the United States 2016 outbreak in chickens, turkeys and mallards.

Authors:  Mary J Pantin-Jackwood; Christopher B Stephens; Kateri Bertran; David E Swayne; Erica Spackman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Modelling farm-to-farm disease transmission through personnel movements: from visits to contacts, and back.

Authors:  Gianluigi Rossi; Rebecca L Smith; Stefano Pongolini; Luca Bolzoni
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Estimating within-flock transmission rate parameter for H5N2 highly pathogenic avian influenza virus in Minnesota turkey flocks during the 2015 epizootic.

Authors:  A Ssematimba; S Malladi; T J Hagenaars; P J Bonney; J T Weaver; K A Patyk; E Spackman; D A Halvorson; C J Cardona
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.451

7.  Genetic analysis identifies potential transmission of low pathogenic avian influenza viruses between poultry farms.

Authors:  Saskia A Bergervoet; Rene Heutink; Ruth Bouwstra; Ron A M Fouchier; Nancy Beerens
Journal:  Transbound Emerg Dis       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 5.005

8.  Waterfowl occurrence and residence time as indicators of H5 and H7 avian influenza in North American Poultry.

Authors:  John M Humphreys; Andrew M Ramey; David C Douglas; Jennifer M Mullinax; Catherine Soos; Paul Link; Patrick Walther; Diann J Prosser
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Agricultural and geographic factors shaped the North American 2015 highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N2 outbreak.

Authors:  Joseph T Hicks; Dong-Hun Lee; Venkata R Duvvuri; Mia Kim Torchetti; David E Swayne; Justin Bahl
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 6.823

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.