Literature DB >> 27309278

Dynamic Coupling among Protein Binding, Sliding, and DNA Bending Revealed by Molecular Dynamics.

Cheng Tan1, Tsuyoshi Terakawa2, Shoji Takada1.   

Abstract

Protein binding to DNA changes the DNA's structure, and altered DNA structure can, in turn, modulate the dynamics of protein binding. This mutual dependency is poorly understood. Here we investigated dynamic couplings among protein binding to DNA, protein sliding on DNA, and DNA bending by applying a coarse-grained simulation method to the bacterial architectural protein HU and 14 other DNA-binding proteins. First, we verified our method by showing that the simulated HU exhibits a weak preference for A/T-rich regions of DNA and a much higher affinity for gapped and nicked DNA, consistent with biochemical experiments. The high affinity was attributed to a local DNA bend, but not the specific chemical moiety of the gap/nick. The long-time dynamic analysis revealed that HU sliding is associated with the movement of the local DNA bending site. Deciphering single sliding steps, we found the coupling between HU sliding and DNA bending is akin to neither induced-fit nor population-shift; instead they moved concomitantly. This is reminiscent of a cation transfer on DNA and can be viewed as a protein version of polaron-like sliding. Interestingly, on shorter time scales, HU paused when the DNA was highly bent at the bound position and escaped from pauses once the DNA spontaneously returned to a less bent structure. The HU sliding is largely regulated by DNA bending dynamics. With 14 other proteins, we explored the generality and versatility of the dynamic coupling and found that 6 of the 15 assayed proteins exhibit the polaron-like sliding.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27309278     DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b03729

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Chem Soc        ISSN: 0002-7863            Impact factor:   15.419


  20 in total

1.  How proteins bind to DNA: target discrimination and dynamic sequence search by the telomeric protein TRF1.

Authors:  Milosz Wieczór; Jacek Czub
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Sliding Mechanism at a Coiled-Coil Interface.

Authors:  David Gomez; Yulian Gavrilov; Yaakov Levy
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Nucleosome Crowding in Chromatin Slows the Diffusion but Can Promote Target Search of Proteins.

Authors:  Ryo Kanada; Tsuyoshi Terakawa; Hiroo Kenzaki; Shoji Takada
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-05-11       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 4.  Whole-Cell Models and Simulations in Molecular Detail.

Authors:  Michael Feig; Yuji Sugita
Journal:  Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 13.827

5.  Facile Assembly/Disassembly of DNA Nanostructures Anchored on Cell-Mimicking Giant Vesicles.

Authors:  Ruizi Peng; Huijing Wang; Yifan Lyu; Liujun Xu; Hui Liu; Hailan Kuai; Qiaoling Liu; Weihong Tan
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  Nucleosome allostery in pioneer transcription factor binding.

Authors:  Cheng Tan; Shoji Takada
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Force-extension behavior of DNA in the presence of DNA-bending nucleoid associated proteins.

Authors:  K Dahlke; C E Sing
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Direct Comparison of Amino Acid and Salt Interactions with Double-Stranded and Single-Stranded DNA from Explicit-Solvent Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Authors:  Casey T Andrews; Brady A Campbell; Adrian H Elcock
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 6.006

9.  Probing Amyloid-DNA Interaction with Nanofluidics.

Authors:  Rajib Basak; Indresh Yadav; Véronique Arluison; Jeroen A van Kan; Johan R C van der Maarel
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

10.  Effects of electrostatic interactions on ligand dissociation kinetics.

Authors:  Aykut Erbaş; Monica Olvera de la Cruz; John F Marko
Journal:  Phys Rev E       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.529

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.