Literature DB >> 27309188

Follow-up of patients with ECL cell-derived tumours.

Liv Sagatun1,2, Reidar Fossmark1,2, Constantin S Jianu1, Gunnar Qvigstad1,2, Ivar S Nordrum3,4, Patricia Mjønes2,3, Helge L Waldum1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To review the presentation, treatment and outcome of patients with type 1 gastric carcinoid tumours.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical records and re-evaluated histopathological specimens of 26 patients with type 1 gastric carcinoids treated at a single tertiary referral centre from 1993 to 2013, with median time of follow-up 52.5 months (IQR 90.8).
RESULTS: Seven patients (27%) had single tumours and 19 patients (73%) multiple tumours at the time of diagnosis. The median number of tumours and median diameter of largest tumour were 2.5 (IQR 3.2) and 6.0 mm (IQR 9.5) respectively. Median serum gastrin was 321.0 pmol/l (IQR 604.0) and median serum chromogranin A 7.7 nmol/l (IQR 5.3). Three patients had metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis and two developed metastases during follow-up. Patients with metastatic disease had larger primary tumours than the others (20.0 mm (IQR 28.5) vs. 5.0 mm (IQR 5.5), p = 0.04). There was a positive correlation between age and tumour size (r = 0.44, p = 0.03) and between serum chromogranin A and serum gastrin at diagnosis (r = 0.76, p = 0.001). Patients were either treated with surgery (n = 8 (31%)), a long-acting somatostatin analogue and/or gastrin receptor antagonist (n = 10 (39%)) for a period of time, or were observed without treatment (n = 8 (31%) with close endoscopic follow up.
CONCLUSIONS: Although gastric carcinoids have an overall good prognosis, a significant proportion develops metastatic disease. As partial and total gastrectomy is associated with major side effects, treatment with long-acting a somatostatin analogue or gastrin antagonist should be considered.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ECL cell; gastric carcinoids; gastrin; somatostatin analogues

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27309188     DOI: 10.3109/00365521.2016.1169588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0036-5521            Impact factor:   2.423


  5 in total

Review 1.  Not only stem cells, but also mature cells, particularly neuroendocrine cells, may develop into tumours: time for a paradigm shift.

Authors:  Helge L Waldum; Kjell Öberg; Øystein F Sørdal; Arne K Sandvik; Bjørn I Gustafsson; Patricia Mjønes; Reidar Fossmark
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-05-27       Impact factor: 4.409

2.  Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms type 1: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Apostolos V Tsolakis; Athanasia Ragkousi; Miroslav Vujasinovic; Gregory Kaltsas; Kosmas Daskalakis
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-09-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasias: manifestations and comparative outcomes.

Authors:  S Felder; H Jann; R Arsenic; T Denecke; V Prasad; B Knappe-Drzikova; S Maasberg; B Wiedenmann; M Pavel; A Pascher; U F Pape
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 5.678

4.  Netazepide Inhibits Expression of Pappalysin 2 in Type 1 Gastric Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Authors:  Katie A Lloyd; Bryony N Parsons; Michael D Burkitt; Andrew R Moore; Stamatia Papoutsopoulou; Malcolm Boyce; Carrie A Duckworth; Klaire Exarchou; Nathan Howes; Lucille Rainbow; Yongxiang Fang; Claus Oxvig; Steven Dodd; Andrea Varro; Neil Hall; D Mark Pritchard
Journal:  Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-01-28

5.  Endoscopic surveillance alone is feasible and safe in type I gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms less than 10 mm in diameter.

Authors:  Klaire Exarchou; Haiyi Hu; Nathan A Stephens; Andrew R Moore; Mark Kelly; Angela Lamarca; Wasat Mansoor; Richard Hubner; Mairéad G McNamara; Howard Smart; Nathan R Howes; Juan W Valle; D Mark Pritchard
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 3.925

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.