Literature DB >> 27307528

Effect of Body Mass Index and Psychosocial Traits on Total Knee Replacement Costs in Patients with Osteoarthritis.

Christian A Waimann1, Rodrigo J Fernandez-Mazarambroz1, Scott B Cantor1, Maria A Lopez-Olivo1, Andrea G Barbo1, Glenn C Landon1, Sherwin J Siff1, Heather Lin1, Maria E Suarez-Almazor2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Clinical and psychosocial attributes are associated with clinical outcomes after total knee replacement (TKR) surgery in patients with osteoarthritis (OA), but their relationship with TKR-related costs is less clear. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of clinical and psychosocial attributes on TKR costs.
METHODS: We conducted a 6-month prospective cohort study of patients with knee OA who underwent TKR. We examined baseline demographic, clinical [body mass index (BMI) and comorbidities], and psychosocial attributes (social support, locus of control, coping, depression, anxiety, stress, and self-efficacy); baseline and 6-month OA clinical outcomes [Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain and function]; and 6-month direct and indirect TKR-related costs. Multiple regression was performed to identify determinants of TKR-related costs.
RESULTS: We included 212 patients; 66% were women, 71% were white, and the mean age was 65.2 years. The mean baseline WOMAC pain score was 55 (SD 19) and WOMAC function score was 54 (SD 20). Mean total TKR-related costs were US$30,831 (SD $9893). Multivariate regression analyses showed that increasing BMI and anxiety levels and decreasing levels of positive social interactions were associated with increased costs. A lower cost scenario with a lower range of normal BMI (19.5), highest positive social interaction, and no anxiety predicted TKR costs to be $22,247. Predicted costs in obese patients (BMI 36) with lowest positive social interaction and highest anxiety were $58,447.
CONCLUSION: Increased baseline BMI, anxiety, and poor social support lead to higher TKR-related costs in patients with knee OA. Preoperative interventions targeting these factors may reduce TKR-related costs, and therefore be cost-effective.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ECONOMIC EVALUATION; OBESITY; OSTEOARTHRITIS; PSYCHOSOCIAL DETERMINANTS; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27307528     DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.151301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0315-162X            Impact factor:   4.666


  6 in total

1.  A qualitative exploration of social and environmental factors affecting diet and activity in knee replacement patients.

Authors:  Sara A Hoffman; Gwendolyn Ledford; Kenzie A Cameron; Siobhan M Phillips; Christine A Pellegrini
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 3.036

2.  Does resilience predict hospital length of stay after total knee arthroplasty? A prospective observational cohort study.

Authors:  Marie K March; Alison R Harmer; Bijoy Thomas; Amy Maitland; Deborah Black; Sarah Dennis
Journal:  Arthroplasty       Date:  2022-07-07

3.  TIMP-2 SNPs rs7342880 and rs4789936 are linked to risk of knee osteoarthritis in the Chinese Han Population.

Authors:  Pengcheng Xu; Wen Guo; Tianbo Jin; Jihong Wang; Dongsheng Fan; Zengtao Hao; Shangfei Jing; ChaoQian Han; Jieli Du; Dong Jiang; Shuzheng Wen; Jianzhong Wang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-01-03

4.  Association of body mass index and osteoarthritis with healthcare expenditures and utilization.

Authors:  Stephen S Johnston; Eric Ammann; Robin Scamuffa; Jonathan Samuels; Andrew Stokes; Elliott Fegelman; Chia-Wen Hsiao
Journal:  Obes Sci Pract       Date:  2020-01-13

5.  Effect of joint mobilization techniques for primary total knee arthroplasty: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jiao Xu; Juan Zhang; Xue-Qiang Wang; Xuan-Lin Wang; Ya Wu; Chan-Cheng Chen; Han-Yu Zhang; Zhi-Wan Zhang; Kai-Yi Fan; Qiang Zhu; Zhi-Wei Deng
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Preferences and motivation for weight loss among knee replacement patients: implications for a patient-centered weight loss intervention.

Authors:  Christine A Pellegrini; Gwendolyn Ledford; Sara A Hoffman; Rowland W Chang; Kenzie A Cameron
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 2.362

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.