Literature DB >> 27307464

Socio-economic risk factors for preterm birth in Norway 1999-2009.

Anne-Marie Oftedal1, Kari Busterud1, Lorentz M Irgens2, Kjell Haug3, Svein Rasmussen4.   

Abstract

AIMS: Preterm birth is a major cause of perinatal mortality and morbidity and is strongly associated with socio-economic factors. The objective of this study was to examine the associations of maternal education, marital status and ethnicity with preterm birth and to determine the extent to which such associations can be explained by the established risk factors of maternal age, parity and smoking.
METHODS: This was a register-based cohort study with data from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway 1999-2009 and Statistics Norway. The sample included all singleton spontaneous births in Norway from 1999 to 2009 (n=494,073). The main outcome measure was preterm birth (gestational age <37 weeks).
RESULTS: Low maternal education and single motherhood were associated with preterm birth. After adjustment for the established risk factors, the excess risks were reduced, but remained statistically significant. The relative risk for low education was reduced from 1.50 to 1.36 and for single motherhood from 1.50 to 1.28. Women from Asia had a higher risk of preterm birth than Norwegian-born women (relative risk 1.29) with minor effects of adjustment. CONCLUSIONS SEVERAL SOCIO-ECONOMIC RISK FACTORS ARE ASSOCIATED WITH PRETERM BIRTH IN NORWAY IN ADDITION TO THE ESTABLISHED RISK FACTORS, PRENATAL HEALTH CARE SHOULD FOCUS ON HIGH-RISK GROUPS DEFINED BY MATERNAL EDUCATION, MARITAL STATUS AND ETHNICITY.
© 2016 the Nordic Societies of Public Health.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Norway; Preterm birth; birth registry; education; ethnicity; marital status; maternal age; parity; smoking; socio-economic risk factors

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27307464     DOI: 10.1177/1403494816653288

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Public Health        ISSN: 1403-4948            Impact factor:   3.021


  6 in total

1.  Revisiting the Table 2 fallacy: A motivating example examining preeclampsia and preterm birth.

Authors:  Gretchen Bandoli; Kristin Palmsten; Christina D Chambers; Laura L Jelliffe-Pawlowski; Rebecca J Baer; Caroline A Thompson
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 3.980

2.  Incidence, risk factors and consequences of preterm birth - findings from a multi-centric observational study for 14 months in Nepal.

Authors:  Abhishek Gurung; Johan Wrammert; Avinash K Sunny; Rejina Gurung; Netra Rana; Yuba Nidhi Basaula; Prajwal Paudel; Amrit Pokhrel; Ashish Kc
Journal:  Arch Public Health       Date:  2020-07-17

3.  Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Admissions among Preterm Babies in a Tertiary Care Centre: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Sahisnuta Basnet; Suraj Adhikari; Jyoti Jha; Mahendra Raj Pandey
Journal:  JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 0.556

4.  Non-medical determinants of perinatal health: protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Leonie A Daalderop; Marjolein W de Groot; Lindsey van der Meer; Eric A P Steegers; Loes C M Bertens
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Extremely and Very Preterm Deliveries in a Maternity Unit of Inappropriate Level: Analysis of Socio-Residential Factors.

Authors:  Adrien Roussot; Karine Goueslard; Jonathan Cottenet; Peter Von Theobald; Patrick Rozenberg; Catherine Quantin
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 4.790

6.  Are risk factors for preterm and early-term live singleton birth the same? A population-based study in France.

Authors:  Marie Delnord; Béatrice Blondel; Caroline Prunet; Jennifer Zeitlin
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.