90Y-microsphere selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) is a valuable treatment in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Partition-model predictive dosimetry relies on differential tumor-to-nontumor perfusion evaluated on pretreatment 99mTc-macroaggregated albumin (MAA) SPECT/CT. The aim of this study was to evaluate agreement between the predictive dosimetry of 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT and posttreatment dosimetry based on 90Y time-of-flight (TOF) PET/CT. METHODS: We compared the 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT results for 27 treatment sessions (25 HCC patients, 41 tumors) with 90Y SIRT (7 glass spheres, 20 resin spheres) and the posttreatment 90Y TOF PET/CT results. Three-dimensional voxelized dose maps were computed from the 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT and 90Y TOF PET/CT data. Mean absorbed dose ([Formula: see text]) was evaluated to compute the predicted-to-actual dose ratio ([Formula: see text]) in tumor volumes (TVs) and nontumor volumes (NTVs) for glass and resin spheres. The Lin concordance ([Formula: see text]) was used to measure accuracy ([Formula: see text]) and precision (ρ). RESULTS: Administered activity ranged from 0.8 to 1.9 GBq for glass spheres and from 0.6 to 3.4 GBq for resin spheres, and the respective TVs ranged from 2 to 125 mL and from 6 to 1,828 mL. The mean dose [Formula: see text] was 240 Gy for glass and 122 Gy for resin in TVs and 72 Gy for glass and 47 Gy for resin in NTVs. [Formula: see text] was 1.46 ± 0.58 (0.65-2.53) for glass and 1.16 ± 0.41 (0.54-2.54) for resin, and the respective values for [Formula: see text] were 0.88 ± 0.15 (0.56-1.00) and 0.86 ± 0.2 (0.58-1.35). DR variability was substantially lower in NTVs than in TVs. The Lin concordance between [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] (resin) was significantly better for tumors larger than 150 mL than for tumors 150 mL or smaller ([Formula: see text] = 0.93 and [Formula: see text] = 0.95 vs. [Formula: see text] = 0.57 and [Formula: see text] = 0.93; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In 90Y radioembolization of HCC, predictive dosimetry based on 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT provided good estimates of absorbed doses calculated from posttreatment 90Y TOF PET/CT for tumor and nontumor tissues. The low variability of [Formula: see text] demonstrates that pretreatment dosimetry is particularly suitable for minimizing radiation-induced hepatotoxicity.
90Y-microsphere selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) is a valuable treatment in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Partition-model predictive dosimetry relies on differential tumor-to-nontumor perfusion evaluated on pretreatment 99mTc-macroaggregated albumin (MAA) SPECT/CT. The aim of this study was to evaluate agreement between the predictive dosimetry of 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT and posttreatment dosimetry based on 90Y time-of-flight (TOF) PET/CT. METHODS: We compared the 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT results for 27 treatment sessions (25 HCC patients, 41 tumors) with 90Y SIRT (7 glass spheres, 20 resin spheres) and the posttreatment 90Y TOF PET/CT results. Three-dimensional voxelized dose maps were computed from the 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT and 90Y TOF PET/CT data. Mean absorbed dose ([Formula: see text]) was evaluated to compute the predicted-to-actual dose ratio ([Formula: see text]) in tumor volumes (TVs) and nontumor volumes (NTVs) for glass and resin spheres. The Lin concordance ([Formula: see text]) was used to measure accuracy ([Formula: see text]) and precision (ρ). RESULTS: Administered activity ranged from 0.8 to 1.9 GBq for glass spheres and from 0.6 to 3.4 GBq for resin spheres, and the respective TVs ranged from 2 to 125 mL and from 6 to 1,828 mL. The mean dose [Formula: see text] was 240 Gy for glass and 122 Gy for resin in TVs and 72 Gy for glass and 47 Gy for resin in NTVs. [Formula: see text] was 1.46 ± 0.58 (0.65-2.53) for glass and 1.16 ± 0.41 (0.54-2.54) for resin, and the respective values for [Formula: see text] were 0.88 ± 0.15 (0.56-1.00) and 0.86 ± 0.2 (0.58-1.35). DR variability was substantially lower in NTVs than in TVs. The Lin concordance between [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] (resin) was significantly better for tumors larger than 150 mL than for tumors 150 mL or smaller ([Formula: see text] = 0.93 and [Formula: see text] = 0.95 vs. [Formula: see text] = 0.57 and [Formula: see text] = 0.93; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In 90Y radioembolization of HCC, predictive dosimetry based on 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT provided good estimates of absorbed doses calculated from posttreatment 90Y TOF PET/CT for tumor and nontumor tissues. The low variability of [Formula: see text] demonstrates that pretreatment dosimetry is particularly suitable for minimizing radiation-induced hepatotoxicity.
Authors: Alexander Villalobos; Mohamed M Soliman; Bill S Majdalany; David M Schuster; James Galt; Zachary L Bercu; Nima Kokabi Journal: Semin Intervent Radiol Date: 2020-12-11 Impact factor: 1.513
Authors: C Chiesa; K Sjogreen Gleisner; G Flux; J Gear; S Walrand; K Bacher; U Eberlein; E P Visser; N Chouin; M Ljungberg; M Bardiès; M Lassmann; L Strigari; M W Konijnenberg Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2017-05-24 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Justin K Mikell; Bill S Majdalany; Dawn Owen; Kelly C Paradis; Yuni K Dewaraja Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2019-04-22 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Mario Jreige; Periklis Mitsakis; Axel Van Der Gucht; Anastasia Pomoni; Marina Silva-Monteiro; Silvano Gnesin; Ariane Boubaker; Marie Nicod-Lalonde; Rafael Duran; John O Prior; Alban Denys; Niklaus Schaefer Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2017-02-23 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Hugo Levillain; Oreste Bagni; Christophe M Deroose; Arnaud Dieudonné; Silvano Gnesin; Oliver S Grosser; S Cheenu Kappadath; Andrew Kennedy; Nima Kokabi; David M Liu; David C Madoff; Armeen Mahvash; Antonio Martinez de la Cuesta; David C E Ng; Philipp M Paprottka; Cinzia Pettinato; Macarena Rodríguez-Fraile; Riad Salem; Bruno Sangro; Lidia Strigari; Daniel Y Sze; Berlinda J de Wit van der Veen; Patrick Flamen Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2021-01-12 Impact factor: 9.236