Literature DB >> 27307010

EQ-5D-derived health utilities and minimally important differences for chronic health conditions: 2011 Commonwealth Fund Survey of Sicker Adults in Canada.

Kate Tsiplova1, Eleanor Pullenayegum2, Tim Cooke3, Feng Xie4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to estimate the EQ-5D-derived health utilities associated with selected chronic conditions (hypertension, heart disease, arthritis, asthma or COPD, cancer, diabetes, chronic back pain, and anxiety or depression) and to estimate minimally important differences (MID) based on the Commonwealth Fund Survey of Sicker Adults in Canada.
METHODS: We used a cross-sectional survey of 3765 sick adults in Canada conducted in 2011 by the Commonwealth Fund. Health utilities were calculated for the entire sample and for each of the eight chronic health conditions. An ordinary least squares regression was used to estimate the utility decrement associated with these conditions with and without adjustment for socio-demographic factors. The MIDs were estimated using the anchor- and distribution-based methods.
RESULTS: The adjusted utility decrement varied from 0.028 (95 % confidence interval (CI) -0.049, -0.008) for diabetes to 0.124 (95 % CI -0.142, -0.105) for anxiety or depression. The anchor-based MID for the entire group was 0.044 (95 % CI 0.025, 0.062), and the distribution-based MID for the entire group was 0.091. The condition-specific MIDs using the distribution-based method ranged from 0.089 for cancer to 0.108 for asthma or COPD.
CONCLUSIONS: The MID estimated by the distribution-based method was larger than the MID estimated by the anchor-based method, indicating that the choice of method matters. The impact of arthritis, anxiety or depression, and chronic back pain on health utility was substantial, all exceeding or approximating the MID estimated using either anchor- or distribution-based methods.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EQ-5D; Health utility; Health-related quality of life; Minimally important difference

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27307010     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-016-1336-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  38 in total

Review 1.  EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group.

Authors:  R Rabin; F de Charro
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.709

2.  Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life.

Authors:  Ross D Crosby; Ronette L Kolotkin; G Rhys Williams
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 3.  Measurement properties and interpretability of the Chronic respiratory disease questionnaire (CRQ).

Authors:  Holger J Schünemann; Milo Puhan; Roger Goldstein; Roman Jaeschke; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  COPD       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.409

Review 4.  Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods.

Authors:  Anne G Copay; Brian R Subach; Steven D Glassman; David W Polly; Thomas C Schuler
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2007-04-02       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 5.  Interpretation of quality of life changes.

Authors:  E Lydick; R S Epstein
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 6.  Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures.

Authors:  Gordon H Guyatt; David Osoba; Albert W Wu; Kathleen W Wyrwich; Geoffrey R Norman
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 7.  The use of the EQ-5D preference-based health status measure in adults with Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  M F Janssen; E I Lubetkin; J P Sekhobo; A S Pickard
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.359

Review 8.  Measuring health-related quality of life.

Authors:  G H Guyatt; D H Feeny; D L Patrick
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-04-15       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Overadjustment bias and unnecessary adjustment in epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  Enrique F Schisterman; Stephen R Cole; Robert W Platt
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.822

10.  Canadian valuation of EQ-5D health states: preliminary value set and considerations for future valuation studies.

Authors:  Nick Bansback; Aki Tsuchiya; John Brazier; Aslam Anis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  8 in total

1.  An Exploratory Study of Long-Term Publicly Waitlisted Bariatric Surgery Patients' Quality of Life Before and 1 Year After Bariatric Surgery, and Considerations for Healthcare Planners.

Authors:  Julie A Campbell; Martin Hensher; Amanda Neil; Alison Venn; Stephen Wilkinson; Andrew J Palmer
Journal:  Pharmacoecon Open       Date:  2018-03

2.  Uneven recovery patterns of compromised health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-3 L) domains for breast Cancer survivors: a comparative study.

Authors:  Jonghan Yu; Woo-Seung Son; Sae Byeol Lee; Il Young Chung; Byung Ho Son; Sei Hyun Ahn; Min-Woo Jo; Jong Won Lee
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 3.186

3.  An Exploratory Study: A Head-to-Head Comparison of the EQ-5D-5L and AQoL-8D for Long-Term Publicly Waitlisted Bariatric Surgery Patients Before and 3 Months After Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Julie A Campbell; Martin Hensher; Amanda Neil; Alison Venn; Petr Otahal; Stephen Wilkinson; Andrew J Palmer
Journal:  Pharmacoecon Open       Date:  2018-12

Review 4.  Distribution- and anchor-based methods to determine the minimally important difference on patient-reported outcome questionnaires in oncology: a structured review.

Authors:  Ahmad Ousmen; Célia Touraine; Nina Deliu; Francesco Cottone; Franck Bonnetain; Fabio Efficace; Anne Brédart; Caroline Mollevi; Amélie Anota
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 3.186

5.  The impact of antihypertensive treatment initiation on health-related quality of life and cardiovascular risk factor levels: a prospective, interventional study.

Authors:  Aapo Tahkola; Päivi Korhonen; Hannu Kautiainen; Teemu Niiranen; Pekka Mäntyselkä
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 2.298

6.  Comparative effectiveness of smartphone healthcare applications for improving quality of life in lung cancer patients: study protocol.

Authors:  Geun Dong Lee; Sei Won Lee; Jang Ho Lee; Jae Hwa Jeong; Wonjun Ji; Hui Jeong Lee; Yura Lee; Min-Woo Jo; Seockhoon Chung; Sung-Cheol Yun; Chang-Min Choi; Jong Won Lee
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 3.320

7.  Impact of lower limb osteoarthritis on health-related quality of life: A cross-sectional study to estimate the expressed loss of utility in the Spanish population.

Authors:  Jesús Martín-Fernández; Roberto García-Maroto; Amaia Bilbao; Lidia García-Pérez; Blanca Gutiérrez-Teira; Antonio Molina-Siguero; Juan Carlos Arenaza; Vanesa Ramos-García; Gemma Rodríguez-Martínez; Fco Javier Sánchez-Jiménez; Gloria Ariza-Cardiel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Estimation of minimally important difference of the EQ-5D-5L utility scores among patients with either hypertension or diabetes or both: a cross-sectional study in Hong Kong.

Authors:  Richard Huan Xu; Eliza Lai-Yi Wong; Annie Wai-Ling Cheung
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.