Literature DB >> 27306999

Is there a relationship between talar osteochondral lesions and foot angles?

Safiye Tokgoz Ozal1, Ahmet Akca1, Emin Cakmakci2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the relationship between talar osteochondral defects (OCDs) and foot angles in this study.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective study that included 25 patients with talar OCD and 29 patients without OCD who underwent magnetic resonance imaging in our department between September 2013 and January 2015. We retrospectively measured the foot angles (Bohler's angle, lateral talocalcaneal angle and calcaneal inclination angle) on ankle radiographs in both groups.
RESULTS: Bohler's angle showed no significant differences between the patients (range 20.50°-48.10°, mean 33.40° ± 6.09°) and the control group (range18.80°-42.40°, mean 31.95° ± 4.21°) (p = 0.397). Calcaneal inclination angle showed no significant differences between the patients (range 3°-29.2°, mean 20.55° ± 6.73°) and the control group (range 10.20°-29.80° mean 20.47° ± 4.21°) (p = 0.956). However, talocalcaneal angle was significantly higher in the patients (range 27.80°-44.80°, median 39.50° ± 6.18°) compared with the control group (range 22.60°-40.50°, median 34.10° ± 4.26°) (p = 0.032).
CONCLUSION: There is an association between lateral talocalcaneal angle and non-traumatic talar OCD.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bohler’s angle; Calcaneal inclination angle; Foot angle; MRI; Osteochondral defect; Talocalcaneal angle

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27306999     DOI: 10.1007/s11547-016-0663-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Med        ISSN: 0033-8362            Impact factor:   3.469


  16 in total

1.  Transchondral fractures (osteochondritis dissecans) of the talus.

Authors:  A L BERNDT; M HARTY
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1959-09       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Characterizing osteochondral lesions by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  J D Dipaola; D W Nelson; M R Colville
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 3.  Femoroacetabular impingement: radiographic diagnosis--what the radiologist should know.

Authors:  Moritz Tannast; Klaus A Siebenrock; Suzanne E Anderson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 4.  A review of osteochondral lesions of the talus.

Authors:  Jordan P Grossman; Michael C Lyons
Journal:  Clin Podiatr Med Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.231

5.  Comparison of MRI and arthroscopy in modified MOCART scoring system after autologous chondrocyte implantation for osteochondral lesion of the talus.

Authors:  Kyung Tai Lee; Yun Sun Choi; Young Koo Lee; Seung Do Cha; Hyung Mo Koo
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 1.390

6.  [The calcaneal angles in the Turkish population].

Authors:  Aksel Seyahi; Serkan Uludağ; Lütfü Ozgür Koyuncu; Ata Can Atalar; Mehmet Demirhan
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.511

7.  Incidence of talar dome lesions with concomitant peroneal tendon pathologic features: a magnetic resonance imaging evaluation.

Authors:  Peter M Stasko; C Keith McSpadden; Rachel Jung; Robert W Mendicino; Alan R Catanzariti
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Surg       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 1.286

8.  Osteochondral lesions of the talus: are there any differences between osteochondral and chondral types?

Authors:  Gi Won Choi; Woo Jin Choi; Hyun Kook Youn; Yoo Jung Park; Jin Woo Lee
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Posterior Radioscaphoid Angle as a Predictor of Wrist Degenerative Joint Disease in Patients With Scapholunate Ligament Tears.

Authors:  Pedro Augusto Gondim Teixeira; Jacques De Verbizier; Sabine Aptel; Maxime Wack; François Dap; Gilles Dautel; Alain Blum
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Boehler's angle: a reappraisal.

Authors:  M Y Chen; S P Bohrer; T F Kelley
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 5.721

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.